: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering
Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or hardware) based
solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a corporate setting of less
than
Have you thought about using Group Policies to lock down the workstations?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
=name of app here.exe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:06 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
Marc,
I
:
http://netfiles.uiuc.edu/ehowes/www/
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:22 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering
Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or hardware) based
solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a corporate setting of less
than 150 users. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
, 2005 11:00 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or hardware
Websense... Although its a bit expensive...
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Childers
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or
hardware) based solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a
corporate setting of less than 150 users. Any suggestions?
I find WebSense quite reasonably priced, endlessly flexible, and
stable. Cannot say the
: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations for software (or
hardware) based
solutions for internet monitoring/filtering in a corporate
We use a Watchguard firewall on our corporate
network. http://www.watchguard.com
FYI, if you use a Watchguard Firebox, make absolutely sure that the DNS
Proxy is *disabled*. There's a serious bug that they have been ignoring
for over a year now that makes it useless when multiple requests
compare Websense with what else is out there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:24 PM
To: Patrick Childers
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
I suggest Management by Walking Around.
Software isn't the solution. People can goof off in all kinds
of ways, not just from IM, email, or websurfing.
Andrew 8)
I'll leave the walking around to the project managers. I only have to worry
about IM, email and websurfing. ;-)
Thanks for the
Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Childers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering
Apps
Sorry for the OT
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering
Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am looking for recommendations
] On Behalf Of Patrick Childers
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and Filtering
Apps
Sorry for the OT but...
It seems we have a lot of goofing off during the work day around here!
Therefore, I am
-
From: Justin Moose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage - Monitoring and
Filtering Apps
We use a Watchguard firewall on our corporate network.
http://www.watchguard.com
You can use it to log all
] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
I called Cisco and the reason the 515s do not log the host name is because
the pix does not look at the data in the packet(s) for the host header
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
Kevin,
I completely understand your dilemma, we have seen this issue many times
before. Many vendors including Cisco do not capture the URL in the syslog
so other methods are needed to monitor web traffic. I
.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
FYI, SonicWall does capture the URL
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
You might seriously want to consider putting up an HTTP
proxy--transparent or standard. And though I'm not the type to blindly
tout Unix-only stuff in Windows groups, Squid (www.squid-cache.org) is
really very cool, if you feel like a little learnin'. Got
Or checkout SmoothWall (http://www.smoothwall.org).
AFAIK, Smoothie _uses_ Squid as its web proxy.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs
Management wants to do web usage mainitoring. They do not at this time want
to do blocking. We have a pix firewall that does what Cisco calls URL
logging but in relaity it does not log the url but the ip address of the
server and the path on the server to the document being viewed.
What they want
web trends firewall suite maybe?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:43 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
Management wants to do web usage mainitoring. They do not at this time
want
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
Management wants to do web usage mainitoring. They do not at this time
want
to do blocking. We have a pix firewall that does what Cisco calls URL
logging but in relaity it does not log the url but the ip address
PIX connected to WebSense connected to SQL(or MSDE) will accomplish this
goal.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
web trends
One caveat to the suggestions is that many smaller sites now share the
same IP with host headers. If you can't capture the domain used, this
information will be lost in those instances. I'm not sure that there is
a reliable way to convert IP's to domains on static sites either since
all that
, March 30, 2004 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
Monster.com?? LOL -Just kidding.
Can the PIX log to a syslog server?
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 30 Mar 2004 at 12:43, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Here we *used* a product called LittleBrother. It would produce
complete tracking reports for every user. Very complete. Simple to
use.
Not sure if it is still avail. We stopped using it because of
privacy/union concerns.
-Nick
: Internet Usage Monitoring
Management wants to do web usage mainitoring. They do not at this time
want
to do blocking. We have a pix firewall that does what Cisco calls URL
logging but in relaity it does not log the url but the ip address of the
server and the path on the server to the document
12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
Monster.com?? LOL -Just kidding.
Can the PIX log to a syslog server?
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
What they want is a log of client ip and url including the host
name. They also do not want to abandon the PIX.
You might seriously want to consider putting up an HTTP
proxy--transparent or standard. And though I'm not the type to blindly
tout Unix-only stuff in Windows
in the reporting.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
One caveat to the suggestions is that many smaller
Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring
The Pix doesn't log the hostname...at least not the 515s we usually work
withonly the IP address.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin
35 matches
Mail list logo
