As such, I am starting to see from addresses ending in
.rr.com coming from IPs that have Adelphia.net REVDNS records.
So
@rr.com .rr.
.rr.com .rr.
should become ?
Would it be an idea to ask for an enhanced spamdomains feature: Regex in the
second row?
Markus
---
This E-mail came
Barry has reported that Deccon is being re-done and will be released later.
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
http://globalweb.net
Richmond's Internet Source since 1996!
WEB HOSTING including EMAIL beginning at $29/month!
DSL
Webmaster
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5
Barry has reported that Deccon is being re-done and will be released
later.
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5
Hijack is working fine, what is not in use is the Declude Console, which as
Randy posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Barry -
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
Excellent! Scott will be mad! He liked all those scanners running for
: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 05:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
Very kool.
Thanks Barry - for the enhancements, the beta program revived, and keeping
us informed.
Best,
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe
Exitscanonvirus: excellent enhancement.
I've cursed the Process Counter popup after every server restart.
Curious on the reasoning behind the bitmasking external test results. I
haven't run across an external program that uses it. Looking up 'bitmask'
and 'external' in the archive, provided
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
Exitscanonvirus: excellent enhancement.
I've cursed the Process Counter popup after every server restart
Scott,
This was the result of a need that I expressed to them. You of course
need both Declude and the external test to support bitmasking before it
can be used, and not just one or the other.
This essentially allows us to construct a single executable that can
test for different items and
Title: Update- Declude NOT being seen
Or
just use automation that does not require the SMTP process to be
restarted.
We
have seen emails with no Declue headers but verry rarly. We never stop and
restart the SMTP unless there is a problem or update. As a matter of fact since
7.15 I have
23, 2003 12:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update-
Declude NOT being seen
Or
just use automation that does not require the SMTP process to be
restarted.
We
have seen emails with no Declue headers but verry rarly. We never stop and
restart the SMTP unless
: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:59 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update-
Declude NOT being seen
Kevin:
If you update the Kill.lst (the SMTP kill list) you have to stop and
start SMTP before it is used.
At least that is why IPSwitch told me.
Kami
Thanks John. I marked it up along with two other recently reported
catches, more importantly, the addition of VIN numbers to the
exclusions. I put a space after the vin and nwq entries. I'll
update the file on my site after a little more time passes.
- GIBBERISHSUB and
this work...?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Charles Frolick [mailto:cmfrolick;argolink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not
related to SpamReview hold manager)
I caught a little settings
... However, I wonder what the
effective load would be on an IMail/Declude JunkMail server with a large
customer base with all of the per-user files that would be required to make
this work...?
Actually, there would normally be very little (if any) extra overhead. The
only extra overhead I
So it wouldn't work for the 6085accounts on
my default host. :-)
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
R. Scott
Perry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:32
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of
SpamReview web app (not related
So it wouldn't work for the 6085 accounts on my default host. :-)
It would work, there would just be a performance penalty -- but it wouldn't
be any worse than the performance penalty of IMail having 6,085 user
subdirectories off of the same directory. :)
If it *was* a performance issue,
. :-)
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to
SpamReview hold manager)
... However, I wonder what the
effective load would
Update to 7.07 from IMail Server 7.0 or higher.
There are usually two possible problems with IMail upgrades interfering
with Declude. The first is that IMail may overwrite the registry entry
that Declude uses. To fix this, you can run the \IMail\Declude.exe file
once to fix the registry
19 matches
Mail list logo
