Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-03 Thread Kevin Rogers
Great. Exactly what I needed. I was also confused about the MAILFROM. Does MAILFROM mean what is displayed as the FROM: in the headers or what it says in the X-Note: This E-mail was sent from 206-72-95-86.wi.skypipeline.com ([206.72.95.86]) or in the X-Declude-Sender field? Maybe I

[Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Kevin Shimwell
Title: Message Good morning Im getting alot of calls from yesterday on customers getting and attached zip. with and exe file X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 5542 [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Subject: Your Email Account is Suspended For Security Reasons WHat do I need to do to stop this? I saw this

Re: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Greg Little
It's a game of "catch me if you can". Mytob has been change frequently (often several times per day) and then sent (seeded) to 000's of addresses, before the AV companies have a chance to react. (I've been getting a few reports each week on these.) It makes for about a 1 day window on many of

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message We block .exe's and zips containing exe's. Check out item #15 (Banning files based on extension) in the Declude Virus Manual at http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=117. You must be running the "Standard" or "Pro" version of Declude Virus. HTH, ~Patrick From:

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Kevin Shimwell
Title: Message I also block exe, But how do you do that for exe contained in zips? Kevin ShimwellLink Brokers Group, LLC ( Support )1600 Hwy 17 SouthNorth Myrtle Beach, SC 29582Phone: 843-663-1004Fax: 843-663-1007Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]24/7Help

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message From the 4th paragraph of section 15 (of the link I posted): "If you wish the banned file extensions to apply to files with .ZIP files, you can add a line "BANZIPEXTS ON" to your \{MAILSERVER}\Declude\virus.cfg file. For example, if you have a line "BANEXT EXE" and

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread David Sullivan
Hello Terry, TF ClamAV - TF http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php TF Get my utilities: runclamd, runclamdscan TF http://www.smartbusiness.com/imail/declude/ TF Set up a scheduled task to periodically run freshclam to keep the TF database update. TF Works extremely well for us. Thanks,

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread John Carter
I use ClamAV (with Runclamscan/Runclamd) as my second scanner and it works great. The only downside is it is a resource hog (but still worth it.) If and when you move to AV/JM 2.0.6.16, consider using the new directive EXITSCANONVIRUSDETECT. It has helped. John -Original Message-

Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread David Sullivan
Looks like I have clam up and running. I'm testing it as my primary scanner to make sure it catches viruses and all looks good so far. It looks like it takes about as much CPU as FProt. I have Rundclamd running as a service under LocalSystem. Should I set the startup type to Automatic or leave it

Re[5]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread David Sullivan
How can I figure out if freshclam is grabbing the latest defs? -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.

Re: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread Terry Fritts
How can I figure out if freshclam is grabbing the latest defs? I set up a scheduled task update_clamav to run every 2 hours or so: start in: c:\clamav-devel\bin\ run: freshclam.exe --quiet -l c:\clamav-devel\log\freshclam.log Then I can check the freshclam.log file. I have Rundclamd running

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread John Carter
Personally if it is working ok, I'd go automatic. I have been known to forget to restart a manual service after rebooting. .16 is a beta, but seems to be doing fine here. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan Sent: Friday,

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread David Sullivan
Hello Terry, Friday, June 3, 2005, 3:26:33 PM, you wrote: How can I figure out if freshclam is grabbing the latest defs? TF I set up a scheduled task update_clamav to run every 2 hours or so: TF start in: c:\clamav-devel\bin\ TF run: freshclam.exe --quiet -l c:\clamav-devel\log\freshclam.log

Re: [Declude.Virus] System resources

2005-06-03 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Bill, First, welcome. I hope yours will be a constant voice on the list. Questions: 1. What version of Declude? 2.06 only, or other versions as well? 2. How about older versions of IMail (8.1x, 8.0x, 7, 6, etc.) Thanks. Darin. - Original Message - From: Bill Billman To:

[Declude.Virus] System resources

2005-06-03 Thread Bill Billman
Hello Everyone, I would like to introduce myself and say hello to everyone. Im new to Declude, having just joined last week. Im very excited about working for Declude and looking forward to working with you all. We have uncovered an intermittent issue with Declude and IMail 8.2.

Re[3]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread David Sullivan
What happened: Everything was flowing along beautifully, then all of a sudden I got this: 06/03/2005 16:30:54 Qbdc2591500a28e52 ERROR: Virus scanner 2 didn't finish after 60 seconds; terminating. 06/03/2005 16:30:54 Qbdc2591500a28e52 WARNING: Couldn't remove .vir directory

RE: [Declude.Virus] System resources

2005-06-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Welcome Bill. John T [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Billman Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PM To: Declude.Jun[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Virus] System

RE: [Declude.Virus] System resources

2005-06-03 Thread Bill Billman
Thanks Darin. The problem seems to be with IMail 8.2 and any version of Declude. We havent seen this problem using any version of Declude and older versions of IMail. Bill From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005

Re: [Declude.Virus] System resources

2005-06-03 Thread Darin Cox
Thanks, Bill. Darin. - Original Message - From: Bill Billman To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 5:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] System resources Thanks Darin. The problem seems to be with IMail 8.2 and any version of Declude. We havent seen this

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
P.S. You can schedule freshclam often because it makes a DNS call to determine if there is a new version of the database, it will only download if that DNS result tells it to. Very efficient. I schedule freshclam every 15 minutes. - Original Message - From: David Sullivan [EMAIL

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
One other ClamAV tip. If you can afford the performance hit and can use PRESCAN OFF, clamav will be a very effective Phish blocker. - Original Message - From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 3:20 PM Subject: Re[2]:

Re: [Declude.Virus] Newbie question

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
The MAILFROM filter test is seperate from anything in the headers. It is the envelope sender. If you want to test on the header from (I call it display from because that's what Outlook displays), you need to check the HEADERS. - Original Message - From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL

Re: Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
I'm running 2.0.6.16 and would consider it as stable as 1.82 - Original Message - From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John Carter Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:02 PM Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner Looks like I have clam up and

Re: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner

2005-06-03 Thread Scott Fisher
One last ClamAV comment... I've added the command line switch --max-ratio 0 I've had some false positives on some .zip files that forced me to add the switch. - Original Message - From: Terry Fritts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Sullivan Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Thursday, June