RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
Is there a way for Declude to stop checking for the GDI Vulnerability and rely on F-Prot? I went to 1.8 and we found that MANY JPG photos were being caught as false positives. Mark Smith --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can we advise anyone sending pictures from a MAC to zip them? Change the extension? Would either solution bypass the scanning? Changing the extension or zipping them would bypass the scanning. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive Is there a way for Declude to stop checking for the GDI Vulnerability and rely on F-Prot? Yes, you can go back to 1.79

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
When you release next fix, can you add the ability to disable this test from inside of declude and rely on the AV software? We probably will, but there should be no legitimate reason for JPEGs to contain the exploit. The issue is that Microsoft's algorithm for detecting them was bad. Our

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread Jim Matuska
, September 30, 2004 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive When you release next fix, can you add the ability to disable this test from inside of declude and rely on the AV software? We probably will, but there should be no legitimate reason for JPEGs to contain the exploit

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread William Stillwell
How about adding per domain too.. for the pro.. ie, in virus_domains.txt do: DOMAINON / OFF / INONLY / OUTONLY ADD: DOMAIN FILEX.CFG and in x.cfg have the standard: Skipext, Banext, Prescan, Ban Options, Footer, Delivererrors,Delete options, which overwrite the standard

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
How about adding per domain too.. for the pro.. DOMAIN FILEX.CFG and in x.cfg have the standard: Skipext, Banext, Prescan, Ban Options, Footer, Delivererrors,Delete options, which overwrite the standard settings in virus.cfg just for that domain. We do have enhanced

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote: We probably will, but there should be no legitimate reason for JPEGs to contain the exploit. The issue is that Microsoft's algorithm for detecting them was bad. Our algorithm should be perfect. If you provided a switch for all such vulnerabilities, then we wouldn't have

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread William Stillwell
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive How about adding per domain too.. for the pro.. DOMAIN FILEX.CFG and in x.cfg have the standard: Skipext, Banext, Prescan, Ban Options, Footer, Delivererrors,Delete options, which

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
And not to upset anyone, how long does it take it to make it to production or beta? I noticed this has been in the Suggestion Database for almost two years. It is important to realize that the suggestion database is not a list of features for the next release. It is as the name implies -- a

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-30 Thread Jay Calvert
Is there a test yet? I would really like to know if we are atleast protected by email. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive And not to upset anyone

[Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread marc catuogno
I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent from a MAC. User-Agent:

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent from a MAC. User-Agent:

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Markus Gufler
I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent from a MAC. After looking in the

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Markus Gufler
For example there is a message showing up in the logfile as 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability] 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability] 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread marc catuogno
] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Mike Wiegers
Sent a test message with jpg attached from Macintosh Entourage 11.0.0 (040405) and it was not caught. Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to