Re: File roller extracting with double click, bug/feature ?

and we can actually take your points into consideration. Best regards, Carlos Soriano Original Message Subject: Re: File roller extracting with double click, bug/feature ? Local Time: November 14, 2016 11:04 AM UTC Time: November 14, 2016 10:04 AM From: li...@andreasn.se To

Re: Hi there

try to review the common things that are usually in every GNOME project. This is usually flexible, the current maintainer can point you in the right direction. Have a nice hacking! Best regards, Carlos Soriano Original Message Subject: Re: Hi there Local Time: October 26, 2016

GSoC Mentors to select students proposals

Hello GSoC Mentors, Students already have their final proposals in the Google's website and we cleaned up everything so you can search for the ones you are interested in. In order to get the students you want in the accepted slots, go to https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/ and search for the

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

Bugs can be migrated with https://gitlab.com/aruiz/gitlab-gnome-tools, is up to the maintainer what to do with them. Best, Carlos Soriano On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: >

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Michael Catanzaro < mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> Can you try with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master? >> It took me 1 second. &

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

Can you try with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master? It took me 1 second. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Jens Georg wrote: > > > > Ah yes, this is slower than before, this was not the case with our > > > instances few weeks ago. > > > > > > I need to check

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

0 Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you try with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/master > ? > >> It took me 1 second. >

GitLab migration status and roadmap

for your patience. Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

Yeah I guess, when the full migration is done, if the maintainer wants to migrate the bugs, we will use that tool. On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 08:48:34PM +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > Bugs can be migr

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

Ah yes, this is slower than before, this was not the case with our instances few weeks ago. I need to check with Andrea. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Considering that large repos on gitlab.com — like, say, >

Re: New upstream repo for json-glib

Hey all, With permission of Emmanuele and following the guidelines we wanted, json-glib is part of the GNOME group now. So the url is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/json-glib Best, Carlos Soriano On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Before some

Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

dre Franke, <afra...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Carlos Soriano via > desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > > This is done now in > > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=365ec7f7ac1cec51dc0248dd05b17cb78

Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Alexandre Franke wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Bastien Nocera > wrote: > > That's fine. The license of the compound work just has to be compatible > > with the individual files' licenses, it doesn't need to be

Re: Pilot GitLab program

that we already collected in the wiki pointed before). Cheers, Carlos Soriano On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tobias Mueller <mue...@cryptobitch.de> wrote: > Hi. > > On Di, 2017-06-27 at 10:54 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > However, understand that participating in th

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hey Milan, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 10:15 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > > a) I often move bugs between products, aka user files it for product A, > > >but the issue (and actual commit) is in

Re: GitLab New Repo Policy

Hey Shaun, Yes, we are blocking on the hooks. I would recommend to wait if you want some hooks in place (kinda required for official GNOME repos). But I guess this is just for your personal project, so probably is fine. Cheers, Carlos Soriano On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Shaun McCance <

Pilot GitLab program

in with your GNOME credentials. Expect Nautilus and librsvg (with Federico) to move to the pilot program this week. Best, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

Re: Pilot GitLab program

, Carlos Soriano On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> Expect Nautilus and librsvg (with Federico) to move to the pilot program >> thi

Re: Pilot GitLab program

asking us when can they move, so this is their chance, while helping us to identify and deal with the issues. Best, Carlos Soriano On Tue., 27 Jun. 2017, 13:13 Adrien Plazas, <kekun.pla...@laposte.net> wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to avoid migrating projects with interns working on >

Re: GitLab status update

Hey Philip, Glad you like it! :) A question from the ignorance, does two factor authentication plays a role if you use LDAP? If not, probably it's not very useful for the contributors here around, since we are supposed to use LDAP and our GNOME account. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation

Re: GitLab status update

a big banner about not using anything else than LDAP. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Philip Withnall <phi...@tecnocode.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 18:11 +0200, Carlo

Re: GitLab status update

Good point, we had a problem recently because of that. I need to discuss it with Andrea. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanz...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: GitLab status update

partially private emails? Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 15:42 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > As al

Re: GitLab status update

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Andre Klapper <ak...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 09:33 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > Issues of the infra are here > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Infrastructure/issues > > Thanks. If that's supposed to be

Re: GitLab status update

Forgot to mention, https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2017- September/msg00015.html must have been in a short period where ssh was not working. Should be fixed since yesterday and no further actions is needed by anyone doing translations. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <ht

Re: GitLab status update

], however those are dummy bugs and not sure how much it matches reality. [0] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues [1] https://gitlab-test.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/issues Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Thu,

Re: Mentor for and promote Outreachy!

(removed from CC everyone except foundation-list and Marina) Hello Marina, That sounds good! Just a question, what is the sponsorship of Red Hat and how that influences whether GNOME can participate in Outreachy? Couldn't we sponsor the students from the GNOME foundation money? Best -- Carlos

GitLab: Default set of status/resolutions/labels for GNOME

just to lay some ground for discussion, and I'm looking forward to see feedback, suggestions and other proposals. Another think to keep in mind is that this interesting to think about even if we don't end up moving to GitLab, since it's some work and investigation we could reuse for future reference.

Re: Mentor for and promote Outreachy!

Sounds good, thanks for the work on that! Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Marina Zhurakhinskaya <mari...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > In the previous rounds, GNOME Foundation preferred that

Re: GitLab: Default set of status/resolutions/labels for GNOME

ent/satisfaction (+ all the technical part and discussion with GitLab people about our priorities, etc. of course). Hope is clearer now, or at least know why I cannot be clearer :) Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:34 PM, <philip

Re: GitLab migration status and roadmap

Just a quick update about performance. Seems their "performance team" is starting to bring some results, in the last release they report improvements in several places. You can take a look at https://about.gitlab.com/2017/08/22/gitlab-9-5-released/#performance-improvements Cheers, Carl

Re: Nautilus has officially moved to GitLab

Hey Bastien, I don't feel is neither wise or unwise. Do you have some specific concern? The only one we had was translations, and that seems to work. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:09 PM, B

Nautilus has officially moved to GitLab

I guess you can expect this from the previous email, Nautilus has moved and is now officially living in our instance of GitLab <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus>. Many thanks to Alberto Ruiz and Andrea Veri for resolving the issues we were blocking on. Best -- Carlos Soriano

GitLab status update

in the 9.5 release post <https://about.gitlab.com/2017/08/22/gitlab-9-5-released/#performance-improvements> . As always, if you have any question, feel free contact me or reply here to this email. Best, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing li

Re: GitLab status update

Since there were some comments about missing transparency, I created public bug reports for those projects who requested to be part of the pilot program. You can take a look at them at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Infrastructure/issues?label_name%5B%5D=PilotProgramRequest Best -- Carlos Soriano

Re: GitLab status update

us more to other projects. If you would like to be hosted in a different group or so, let's discuss it with release team. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation <https://www.gnome.org/foundation/> Treasurer, Board of Directors On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jens Georg <m...@jensge.o

Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

bugs + crashes and having some tarball and package ready for people to try and is probably ready to go as a preview. I think that's what we did with other apps in the past. And if not, would be nice to have that this time. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors

GitLab: Status update

.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure/Comments>, or if it's more like an issue with our GitLab set up you can file an issue here <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Infrastructure/issues/new>. For any question you can answer to this email or ping me. Bes

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

Yes, I believe we can stop that on our end. Andrea? Can we stop mails coming from GitLab for a specific product for when we do bug migrations? Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:18 AM, <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote: > On

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

Thanks Andrea. Ok, let's do that then, seems all the "cons" are fixed and commenting on behalf of users doesn't seem to be something as bad as I though since nobody mentioned that here so far :) Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Dec 1, 20

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

was being just too cautious. So yeah, let's go with that. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote:

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

GitLab is definitely intended to be compehensible withouth consulting a manual, and just by the UI. If the UI is unclear, it's probably a bug or a missing feature, and they have a design team for these. The shortcuts for example, would be good to have a shortcuts window as we implemented recently

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

Oh haha Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, 09:36 Carlos Soriano, <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> The shortcuts for example, would be good to have a shortcuts

GitLab: Projects moved and some advice

Hello all, By request, here's an update of projects that has already moved to GitLab between last week and this week: - Niepce - GNOME Photos - GNOME Music - librsvg - Meld - libgweather - Recipes - Simple Scan - Hitori - gst-debugger - GNOME Multi Writer - GNOME Mud - libgepub The goal for this

Re: User account for migrating Bugzilla issues to GitLab

will move it to /GNOME. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Philip: this is much appreciated. > > Since Alberto won't likely have time to work on this for a whi

Re: gjs 1.51.2

with it. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > Yeah, I asked Andrea to do that two wee

Re: gjs 1.51.2

Yeah, I asked Andrea to do that two weeks ago for every project that moved to GitLab, so I wondered what happened. But if you say it works... Michael, can you clarify off list what is the issue? Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:37

Re: gjs 1.51.2

Hey Philip, This was written in our pilot program wiki[0], sorry if I didn't send this to you. For the developer bit in Bugzilla, ask Andrea. Cheers [0] https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure/P

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 4:45 PM, wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Florian Müllner > wrote: > >> Why is that in the list? I would expect most users to use the various >

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

I actually had no idea about the shortcuts until recently, specifically for screenshoting an area, so I would be slightly against this. If we had the shorcuts window in GNOME Shell and the initial setup would show it as it's planned then I would probably be fine with the removal. Best -- Carlos

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

e missing issue tracker features. > > I'm pretty sure you succeed, appreciated you spent the time to not be over the top. > On 12/07/2017 12:07 PM, Carlos Soriano wrote: > >> Said that, add your comments about specific improvements to issue #8 >> too in a new comment so

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

Hey Milan, I just took a look at your issue. You couldn't add a label because you didn't created any label in the project. I create some for you so you can play with them. https://gitlab-test.gnome.org/mcrha/test/issues/2 Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

-> labels -> click button "generate default labels". Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hey Milan, > > I just took a look at your issue. You couldn't a

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

If you read my email fully and clicked the links, you would have seen the specific date the rebase before merge is coming to our instance. I'm surprised that copy a comment and clicking the button "quote" vs pressing a button should be considered a blocker for migrating more projects. If that's

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

And I agree, I also want a reply button! On Thu., 7 Dec. 2017, 19:07 Carlos Soriano, <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > If you read my email fully and clicked the links, you would have seen the > specific date the rebase before merge is coming to our instance. > > I'm surprised t

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57 PM wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro >> wrote: >> > Looking over #8, I think duplicate issues, canned

GitLab update: Moving to the next step

don't have unlimited energy :) Also thanks to all that helped so far, specially Phillip, Emmanuele and Alberto. Hope you enjoy the news and the work we have done. Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mai

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

om/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/> and add it in a comment to our list? You are the best person to explain why you need that option. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-12-06 a

IMPORTANT: Mass migration to GitLab update

rminal - gnome-online-accounts - totem - rhythmbox - cogl Please let me know any thoughts, questions or concerns you might have! Cheers, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

IMPORTANT Mass migration to GitLab starts

. Hope the ride goes well for everyone! Cheers, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: IMPORTANT: Mass migration to GitLab update

Here you are, I created an issue to not forget again https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/GitLab/issues/240. Thanks for sending a new email! On 20 May 2018 at 23:17, Tim-Philipp Müller wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > > Exceptions are possible but discouraged due to overhead, please

Re: IMPORTANT: Mass migration to GitLab update

whoops good catch! Thanks Alberto. On 21 May 2018 at 07:18, Alberto Fanjul Alonso wrote: > Glade is already migrated with bugs https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glade, > the pending migration is for glade-web https://gitlab.gnome.org/ > Infrastructure/GitLab/issues/232,

Migration of GNOME to GitLab is now completed

. Cheers, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Protected branches in GNOME's GitLab

A small correction from Florian's asnwer: We had a period that some branches were protected by default because I didn't know how to deactivate that. But it shouldn't be the case for new projects or new migrated projects. Cheers On 30 April 2018 at 19:19, Florian Müllner

Re: BUG REPROT: Bug tracker URLs not talking with Canonical's Launchpad

Hey Jeb, I'm confident Canonical and Ubuntu are aware of this limitation, they are also GNOMER's around here. Not sure if they will be able to implement that feature, but there's nothing we can do from here I'm afraid. Cheers On 3 May 2018 at 16:08, Jeb Eldridge wrote: >

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved and 'tips of the week'

ribed (if you were in the CC list, like if you put a comment, you are subscribed though), sorry! Enjoy! On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Robert Ancell <robert.anc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 at 06:53 Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> >&

[GitLab] Question of the week: Names for groups

Hello all, [For the engagement team, skip to the "Question of the week" section underneath] If you read the previous email to desktop-devel-list , I'll do a "tips of the week" to ease the transition of everyone to

[GitLab] Projects moved and 'tips of the week'

Hello all, *Projects migrated today* - gnomegr-web - wing - pygobject - krb5-auth-dialog - libgtop

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved and 'tips of the week'

Done <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgtop/issues/35>, cheers. Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 22 January 2018 at 18:08, 藍挺瑋 <lant...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tobias Mueller 於 西元2018年01月23日 00:46 寫道: > > Hi. > > > > On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 00:09 +080

Re: Release team now using gnome-build-meta repository, not JHBuild

is worked out it's kinda unexpected. What's the workflow for those before a proper solution is done? Or are the developers of those modules expected to maintain JHbuild on the meantime? Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 22 January 2018 at 19:17, Sam Thursfield <sss...@gmail.com>

Re: [GSoC] Urgent action required: Call for ideas

Small correction, it's by* Saturday 27th*. Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 26 January 2018 at 09:55, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > Dear GNOME hackers, > > It's this time of the year again, GSoC is here! > > It's time for mentors to ad

[GSoC] Urgent action required: Call for ideas

Dear GNOME hackers, It's this time of the year again, GSoC is here! It's time for mentors to add their project ideas. Unfortunately this year we felt a bit behind schedule, and we need to have this done by* this Saturday 26th* to give us admins time to review them. So please add them ASAP to our

[GitLab] Projects moved, tips of the week and question of the week

please say so too. Comment your thoughts and ideas on the discussion. <https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/GitLab/issues/99> Cheers, Carlos Soriano ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: [GSoC] Urgent action required: Call for ideas

gt; <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > > Do you need them by today (Friday 26th) or tomorrow (Saturday 27th)? > > Tomorrow, January 27th. > > > Cheers, Adrien Plazas > > > > Le ven. 26 janv. 2018 à 9:55, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> a >

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved, tips of the week and question of the week

On 8 February 2018 at 00:03, Alexandre Franke <afra...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> > > Hi, > > >> Today we hit a milestone, three of the biggest projects i

Re: Let's kill gnome-common!

Thanks Bastien. > Or better port to meson. Yeah that sounds like a better task. Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 13 February 2018 at 10:20, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 10:08 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > Hi Michael, >

Re: Let's kill gnome-common!

Hi Michael, Could you give some context and explanation on this? I could take the gnome-autoar, but need to know why this is wanted and the alternative to gnome-common. Cheers On 13 February 2018 at 02:08, wrote: > Hi, > > I want to remove gnome-common from our

[GitLab] Projects moved, general comments, tips of the week, question of the week

Our migration is going faster that I have planned. We reached our second milestone today, the most core-ish platform-ish modules asked for a migration and are now migrated. So allow me to do two claps  *Projects migrated today* - gtk (no bugs yet) - glib

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved, tips of the week and question of the week

erts Muktupāvels < alberts.muktupav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > question about commits-list: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/commits-list > > Is there any plan to restore option to subscribe to commits for projects > that has moved to gitlab? > > > On

Re: Transmitter - GUI for transmission-daemon and transmission-remote

Our instance of GitLab is just a regular GitLab CE, so it should be capable to host any kind of project and to use the features present in GitLab CE like uploading tarballs (quick internet search will show you the official docs for that). Cheers, Carlos Soriano On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 10:03 PM

CI/CD workshop with GitLab developer

Hello all, We will have a workshop with a GitLab developer at GUADEC 9th July about CI/CD. We are creating the agenda, and I would like to ask what points would you like to see? The current agenda is: *Introduction to GitLab CI/CD* - Concepts - Why use GitLab CI/CD? - Overview *Setup CI* -

Re: CI/CD workshop with GitLab developer

end it? > Thanks. > > 2018-06-21 9:16 GMT-03:00 Carlos Soriano : > >> Hello all, >> >> We will have a workshop with a GitLab developer at GUADEC 9th July about >> CI/CD. We are creating the agenda, and I would like to ask what points >> would you like to see? >

Re: [GitLab] Group runners: And why CI is slow in forks

Support from the Engagement Team to create a social media strategy, > etc. > > Warm Regards. > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:28 AM Carlos Soriano wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > In case you missed my treasurer report talk at GUADEC, our annual costs >

Re: [GitLab] Group runners: And why CI is slow in forks

rience for CI for the whole GNOME, so that means we need to have them centralized. This is useful to play with it to see costs and how much donation could be made. Cheers On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 10:08, Carlos Soriano wrote: > That sounds great! Seems you know how to set up this which is wonderuf

[GitLab] Bugs migrations status

Just a heads up, for those projects waiting for me to migrate bugs apologies I have been slow, the baseline time requirement of GitLab as admin is not trivial yet and real work is knocking the door :) Said that, I'll try to do a migration batch this week for those projects without special request

[GitLab] Updated to 11.1

*What's important for us?* - Performance improvements - Rewrite of the MR backend . Should be much smoother and

[GitLab] Group runners: And why CI is slow in forks

Hello all, In case you missed my treasurer report talk at GUADEC, our annual costs for CI is around $22.000. This is okay since we are lucky to have GitLab Inc. as the main sponsor of that. However, we cannot offload all of our needs on them, even more in the long-term. So we need to 1) find

Re: [GitLab] Gravatar vs libravatar

There has been indeed many things I didn't realize back then! This has got an overwhelming positive outcome, so seems replacing Gravatar by libravatar is the way forward. We will replace it in two weeks if no blocker appears. Thanks all! On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 18:00, Tobias Mueller wrote: >

Re: Release team now using gnome-build-meta repository, not JHBuild

ust wanted to have clear that part. So I guess is up to us the developers to keep maintaining JHBuild as best as we can while finding other solutions. Cheers On 22 January 2018 at 21:31, <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@

[GSoC] Call for ideas

Hello all, As you may know GNOME was again accepted for GSoC! Thanks to the mentors who've already listed GSoC project ideas! There is still time to add more ideas and they are more than welcome. If you are interested, please add your idea to the wiki

Re: [GSoC] Call for ideas

lternative email for communication (optional) and phone number. Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 12 March 2018 at 09:38, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > As you may know GNOME was again accepted for GSoC! > > Thanks to the mentors who've al

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved, general comments, tips of the week, question of the week

> I apologize, if I sounded inappropriate earlier. No worries, it was fine. I probably wasn't clear in the past what people need to do to discuss these priorities and it's a very valid question. Cheers Carlos Soriano GNOME Board of Directors On 28 February 2018 at 17:38, Milan Crha

Re: GNOME 3.28.1 tarballs due

I'll put a banner in GitLab. Cheers. On 7 April 2018 at 19:50, wrote: > Hi developers, > > It looks like our automated reminder mails are not working properly > currently. (Does anybody know how to help fix this?) 3.28.1 tarballs are > due Monday. You all know the drill.

Re: [GitLab] Easter gift, GitLab Pages are now enabled

your nautilus-web example is ultimately going to be merged > into nautilus' git repo? Or I didn't understood? That would be awesome! > > Regards, > Xavier Claessens. > > Le jeudi 29 mars 2018 à 19:54 +0200, Carlos Soriano a écrit : > > As the subject says, we have now supp

[GitLab] Easter gift, GitLab Pages are now enabled

As the subject says, we have now support for GitLab Pages , thanks to Andrea. Take a look to the example I did for Nautilus with Hugo, which renders to this result

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

Just issue and MR descriptions. Not sure I understood your idea though, what would you put in a comment? On 24 March 2018 at 14:39, Alexandre Franke <afra...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > Proper forma

[GitLab] Duplicates handling, feedback for meeting with GitLab

Hello all, I'm having a meeting with GitLab on Friday about what we are missing for duplicates handling as part of one of the high priority items . I identified the following points (upstream comment

Re: [GitLab] Easter gift, GitLab Pages are now enabled

sier to contribute and maintain than the wiki, with all the custom styling we do in the wiki I'm starting to think that it could be. On the other hand it's not very obvious the end result of the Hugo website is when looking at these templates. Ultimately it depends on how we see it... the proposal is

[GSoC] Mentors: Time to review students proposals

Hello GSoC Mentors, Students have already added their final proposals to the GSoC website and we cleaned up everything so you can search for the ones that you are interested in. In order to get the students who you want into the accepted slots, go to https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/ and

Re: [GitLab] IMPORTANT: Mass migration plan

By request, cc'ing this list. On 20 March 2018 at 18:01, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hello community, > > After a few months of manually migrating projects we have moved already > over 60, most of them were core modules to make sure the most important > p

  1   2   3   >