Re: Label in tray = P in the A

El mié, 24-03-2010 a las 16:14 +, Sergey Udaltsov escribió: I am sorry, you lost me here. How could the label be the emblem? You mean some kind of word-art? I think what he means is to display the icon and render the three letter acronyms over it. Or in other words, use the keyboard icon as

Re: 2.31.3 release will be a bit late -- current status

El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 11:33 +0100, Lucas Rocha escribió: Hi Chen, This has been fixed to work with gtk version 2.21.2 and had a problem with compiling with 2.21.1. Fixed it - http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/commit/?id=905a30860e08f0264c746ca7a92d5b405015196c and

Re: 2.31.3 release will be a bit late -- current status

El jue, 10-06-2010 a las 12:49 +0200, Jan de Groot escribió: It has been renamed, but so far there's no tarball release of gtk+ with that change included. Oh, I was just trying to express that a simple rename is going to break g-d-s again in the future - I didn't mean to imply that there's no

Re: Vikas Kushwaha added your name to the Academia.edu directory of academics

El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 16:48 -0700, Vikas Kushwaha escribió: Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Paul Krugman, Noam Chomsky and Steven Pinker have all recently confirmed their membership of their departments on Academia.edu. Go, Desktop D. List, go! signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: (L)GPLv3

El mar, 06-07-2010 a las 12:32 -0500, Ted Gould escribió: On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:17 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote: It's the GPLv2 in the program code that states you can't link this against anything other than GPLv2 code. Nothing we could add to the library licence (other than

Re: GNOME 2.91/3.0 Schedule Draft

El dom, 10-10-2010 a las 14:37 +0200, daniel g. siegel escribió: On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:30 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Currently UI Freeze starts at Feb 21 (together with 2.91.90 release) which would mean six weeks until 3.0.0 is released. The request is to move it to Feb 09, 2011 (which

Re: Metacity towards GNOME 3.0

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:29 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: - We could just make it require GTK+ 3.0. This is my suggestion - GNOME 3 is a GTK+ 3.0-based desktop. Metacity is the GNOME (fallback) window manager. GTK+ 3.0 will be released as a stable toolkit before Metacity 3.0 is

Re: My thoughts on fallback mode

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:07 +0100, Christopher Roy Bratusek wrote: Compared to how many users stuff like Compiz, AWN Co got I would say it's somewhere between 5 and 10%. Please take AWN (CairoDock, Docky, ...) out of your argumentation - there's exactly nothing stopping you from using those

Re: Interested in GNOME on touchscreens?

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 14:51 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: An on-screen keyboard GUI probably would not need to be coded in Clutter to look well integrated with GNOME Shell, unless there is some advantage to coding the GUI in JavaScript, I'd think. The main selling point for an on-screen keyboard

Re: Plugins, modules and extensions

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 15:52 +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote: A different issue is then UI. Some time ago it was proposed to introduce addons.gnome.org, skip the (rpm/deb) packaging completely and just instruct users to go, download the plugin and install it. This has the problem that the plugin

Re: Plugins, modules and extensions

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:50 +0200, Giovanni Campagna wrote: So .gsx (application/vnd.gnome.shell-extension) for the Shell, .gdp (application/vnd.gnome.gedit-plugin) for Gedit, .epe (application/vnd.gnome.epiphany-extension) for Ephiphany, etc.? How would it integrate with, for example,

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:59 +0200, Robert Ancell wrote: Why replace GDM? - LightDM is a cross-platform solution. Will KDE replace kdm with LightDM or drop its non-greeter code in favor of LightDM? Are there any interesting discussions in the other camp that you can point us to? Florian

Re: GNOME user survey 2011

2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com Yes, but if a significant percentage of the people answer not at all, or somewhat, then the survey would be a bit wasted, since now you have to wait another year to ask in more detail. Of course the same argument applies if a significant

Re: GNOME user survey 2011

2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com Do the majority of GNOME developers agree that there are too few options? No. Florian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Features !

On mié, 2011-10-05 at 16:22 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: For the shell: mode-switch kill? Overview window borders? Yes, Jakub and me are planning on working on mode-switch kill. Florian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Features !

On sáb, 2011-10-08 at 11:48 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: GNOME's implementation is very young; I have a hard time finding apps on my computer using this feature even in GNOME 3.2; There are no jumplists in GNOME 3.2, which explains your troubles finding apps making use of this feature ;-)

Re: 3.4 Features, final round

On dom, 2011-11-06 at 21:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote: Lets avoid the fact that this is by MS, it is still useful to look at. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/features/jump-lists They distinguish between recently and frequently used too I am not able to see the embedded

Re: 3.4 Features, final round

On dom, 2011-11-06 at 22:52 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote: What you see for me doesnt necessarily mean that the program populates the jumplist alone. It means the items in the jumplist are prgram specific. To me it means that the application is in control of what appears in the jumplist, not

Re: 3.4 Features, final round

On lun, 2011-11-07 at 00:23 +0100, Seif Lotfy wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org To me it means that the application is in control of what appears in the jumplist, not necessarily that it is responsible

Re: Last GNOME 3.4 Blocker Report

On Mar 20, 2012 9:27 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: I normally prefer to say the application that displays web pages when talking to non-tech people. The GNOME Web Blue e ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Luis Medinas lmedi...@gnome.org wrote: do you really want to start talking about what the community think about this ? Because if you want to start talking i recommend to see how many threads we have, specially on gnome-shell ml, about design decisions that

Re: 3.6 Feature: Lock Screen

As I understand it, typing the password will switch to the password dialog, which is about as keyboard/non-touch friendly as it gets :-) Florian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: GNOME Goal Proposal: Port to GMenu

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote: I don't know if Unity supports having both regular menus and a Gmenu at the same time. I don't know either, but I don't think it is relevant here - there is GMenu support for *both* app menu and window menu in

Re: GNOME Goal Proposal: Port to GMenu

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: In some cases there will be a GMenu and a menu bar (with File/Edit/View...) for the same app, at least in the short term. There is some confusion about terminology here, so Ryan asked me to clarify :-) GMenu is a newly

Re: Gnome 3 issues

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:40 AM, surma su...@hot.ee wrote: That messed up my hands and I can't use mouse. That is why I liked gnome 2, everything could be done without mouse. And the same is true for Gnome3 - to navigate to an application, you can use super ctrlPgDown tab (tab | shifttab

Re: Gnome 3 issues

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Emmanuel Pacaud emman...@gnome.org wrote: Wouldn't it be better to make right arrow replace the ctrlPgDown tab sequence. ctrlPgUp/PgDown are the standard GNOME shortcuts for switching between tabs, so I don't think removing them is a good idea. Obviously we

Re: GNOME Goal Proposal: Port to GMenu

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Andrew Cowie Is there a reference application doing this right? There are two paths available to applications - (1) replace the menu bar entirely, or (2) move some items to the app menu. For

Re: GNOME Goal Proposal: Port to GMenu

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Matteo Settenvini matteo...@member.fsf.orgwrote: By the way, and slightly unrelated: F10 allows me to pop up the first menu, and ALT+letter to open a specific one by accelerator. What is the corresponding shortcut for the upper menu? SuperF10 to open, arrow

Re: Some points about IM integration

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Marguerite Su i...@marguerite.su wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote: GNOME doesn't want to work well just for tweakers and enthusiasts - it's very important to the project that GNOME works well for all users without

Re: Finding and debugging the battery applet in GNOME 3.4 fallback mode

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to characterize a bug in OLPC's development builds (based on F17) where the battery icon applet is out of sync with upower. Where is it controlled from? Under gnome-shell, it is

Re: Finding and debugging the battery applet in GNOME 3.4 fallback mode

On May 30, 2012 12:28 AM, Michael Biebl mbiebl mbi...@gmail.com@mbi...@gmail.com gmail.com mbi...@gmail.com wrote: We've had similar bug reports in Debian: http:// http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674429 bugs.debian.org

Re: Be respectful and considerate. A complaint.

On Jul 2, 2012 11:52 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: This has been a part of GNOME since 3.2. 3.0 actually. Florian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Again: please clarify the decision on IBus integration

On Jul 9, 2012 4:52 PM, Rui Tiago Cação Matos tiagoma...@gmail.com wrote: If you start offloading keybindings and other configurations then how do you make sure that the UI will be consistent with the remaining GNOME UI? Particularly for keybindings it's not merely about UI consistency -

Re: Compiling glib applications

On Aug 10, 2012 9:38 AM, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote: On 09/08/12 23:13, Colin Walters wrote: Patches?? On the desktop *development* list? What's going on??? Whats wrong with that, and where should I send it instead? Nothing. I'm pretty sure Colin was referring to desktop-devel-list tending

Re: Enable accessibility team to automatically receive bugmail on a11y bug reports

On Aug 16, 2012 1:41 PM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote: On 08/10/2012 07:15 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: Still I haven't seen any feedback from module maintainers in this thread, and whether an Accessibility component in Bugzilla would be accepted. Feedback welcome. Being minimalistic

Re: Requiring systemd for the gnome-settings-daemon power plugin

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 15:30 +0200, Florian Max wrote: On vie, 2012-10-19 at 14:55 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 08:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bastien Nocera

Re: Requiring systemd for the gnome-settings-daemon power plugin

On vie, 2012-10-19 at 12:19 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: The other thing we can do (and really should do) is share more code relating to systemd/CK and in general system abstractions. It's really pretty silly how hard we make it to share code between gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-shell. I'd

Re: Requiring systemd for the gnome-settings-daemon power plugin

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: This is what I feel. DBus is our system abstraction layer. I feel that making ConsoleKit support the logind interface wouldn't be that big of a patch and solve this issue, at least. Unless I'm mistaken ConsoleKit

Re: Removing fallback support code

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: There's also a lot more work (in addition to using XI2 for events capture) that would need to be done if we were to remove all the key capture from gnome-settings-daemon, namely the hacks Rui has been adding for layout

Re: GnomeGoal for 3.8: DesktopFileKeywords

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Henrique Ferreiro henrique.ferre...@gmail.com wrote: Users are usually going to install languages they know. ... on distributions that package language support separately. However it is not uncommon to ship all available languages for an application within the

Re: Fallback mode is going away - what now ?

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: A separate user session would be the best user experience, IMO. If you think so, we'll have to discuss the technicalities of making that work.

Re: Gnome shell is really awesome

On Feb 7, 2013 11:11 PM, Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net wrote: Nice post, I am currious about the implementation details of the Classic mode. You can think of classic mode as a gnome-shell session with a default set of enabled extensions. * Is it possible to remove the application menu and then call

Re: Why does killing GS with SIGHUP crash on the 2nd time?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote: For some reason, using this command twice crashes the shell. It is not python-specific, as pkill -HUP gnome-shell and killall -HUP gnome-shell produce the same result, which is odd because Alt+F2 + r * (a lot)

Re: Why does killing GS with SIGHUP crash on the 2nd time?

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote: How can I pass global.reexec_self() to org.gnome.Shell? Sorry, I have little to no (g)dbus experience. Ignoring any error handling: from gi.repository import Gio, GLib proxy = Gio.DBusProxy.new_for_bus_sync(

Re: Blocker bug review for 3.8

On Mar 5, 2013 5:57 AM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: 694771 mutter menus broken in 3.7.10 This was fixed in 3.7.91, somehow we missed closing the bug. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: The name of applications on GNOME 3.7.92 testing image

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Mike mikeandm...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with the fact that we need a simpler text editor, but let's just call it as Textpad or something... without excluding gedit. Nobody is excluding gedit. The gedit developers *want* their project to be called gedit

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: This is problematic is for those of us who use VPN The mockup[0] linked from the proposal shows VPN(s) directly in the menu when a VPN has been set up. Non-issue? [0]

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote: In fact, I think that these sorts of subtle design-based decisions should be held in something like loomio (see recent loomio post in desktop-devel), to be later implemented if the response is positive. And

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon pionchon@gmail.com wrote: The main point is that so-called controversial features does not have to be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be shipped as default, but with a way to revert them in the case they block the

Re: Feature proposal: combined system status menu

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote: At least until we get a better testing infrastructure in place, the only way to get at least *some* user testing is [...] to get some minimal exposure to adventurous users of unstable/experimental distributions Again

Re: New GnomeGoal proposal: InstalledTests

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Anyways...dropping tarballs is not going to happen soon, but I'm happy to consider what we need to do to lay the foundations now. More short-term, would it make sense to leverage the build servers to run make distcheck

3.12 feature: polari

Polari is a simple IRC client designed for GNOME 3. Tentative designs have been around for a while, but hacking only started around Guadec. It is obviously not end-user ready at that point, but I'm confident that it can be in time for 3.12, thus this feature proposal. See

Re: 3.12 feature: polari

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have something like a roadmap for what you hope to have in 3.12 ? I have just added one at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Polari/Roadmap; there is only one item that isn't either small or doesn't have some

Re: Proposal for a new default window resize behaviour

On Nov 7, 2013 2:06 PM, Petko Ditchev pditc...@gmail.com wrote: drag the window to a corner - it resizes to the adjacent quadrant of the screen ; See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696130 for a related proposal. Cheers, Florian ___

Re: Suggestions for an official GNOME hosted document collaboration suite?

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27 PM, alex diavatis alexis.diava...@gmail.com wrote: there is any legal issue that prevent gnome to introduce a per-user revenue model, or in other words commercial services over open source solutions? Being a non-profit organization[0], I would assume so (but then I

Re: Power switch to actually turn off my computer

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Charles T. Smith cts.private.ya...@gmail.com wrote: Charles T. Smith cts.private.yahoo at gmail.com writes: I've spent an hour or so looking around /usr/lib/python/site-packages/gtweak and haven't found what it does yet... 'grep' is your friend - it modifies

Re: Power switch to actually turn off my computer

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Charles T. Smith cts.private.ya...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is, I'm new to this group (but I like it!) and I don't know where to find org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.power - I mean, somewhere where I can grep it. I used git-grep in the gnome-tweak-tool

Re: Power switch to actually turn off my computer

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Charles T. Smith cts.private.ya...@gmail.com wrote: Do you suppose that kde also manages the power switch internally? If by manage the power switch internally you mean call out to logind via DBus, then yes, I would KDE expect to do the same eventually (provided

Re: Power switch to actually turn off my computer

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Charles T. Smith cts.private.ya...@gmail.com wrote: So, one responder supposed that gnome listens to the power switch, and another responder supposed that logind listens to the power switch - but that's only when someone is logged in. Actually both are correct

Re: Dragging windows to resize them to half the screen

On 27 Jun 2014 11:57, Petko Ditchev pditc...@gmail.com wrote: Previously I could drag a window to the side to resize it to the right or left half. Is it a bug that it's not working with the latest releases? It is working as expected here (so no, the feature has not been removed, nor are there

Re: Dragging windows to resize them to half the screen

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Petko Ditchev pditc...@gmail.com wrote: It returns false. Good, so that's the problem. How do I change the setting ? It depends on whether you are using the normal or classic session, still gsettings reset org.gnome.shell.overrides edge-tiling gsettings

Re: Problems to compile gnome-shell - st-texture-cache.c

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Mauro Alexandre upma...@gmail.com wrote: I can't compile gnome-shell because GTK_ICON_LOOKUP_DIR_RTL and GTK_ICON_LOOKUP_DIR_LTR is undeclared in file src/st/st-texture-cache.c. You need to update GTK+ - those two flags first appeared in 3.13.2, so that's the

Re: session-manager fails to recognize inhibitor

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Jan Niggemann j...@hz6.de wrote: My problem is that the inhibition and the reason are not shown during log out on GNOME 3.4 (Debian stable 32bit). Why is that? Most likely because your console application does not have access to the same session bus used by

Re: RFC: GSound, a GObject library for playing system sounds

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: Surely by pushing all your awesome code into GDK or GTK we would get all this awesome new functionality for free in the toolkit? Or possibly GIO? Playing sounds is not really tied to a (visible) UI, though linking to

Re: Enabling builddir != srcdir by default in jhbuild

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:47 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Just please wait a couple days first to see if there are any > substantial objections (which I do not expect). Is this really necessary? This is a revived thread from February, so surely there has been plenty of

Re: gnome-settings-daemon now split up

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >The GNOME Classic session file has not been updated yet It has been updated on master now. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:20 PM Jehan Pagès wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I don't like the fact that the bug report and the merge request are > > separate. > > I don't like this either. This just makes no

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:08 PM Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 15:55 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > No, as written in the wiki you write "Closes: $number" and it will > > > handle things automatically. > > > Of course some addition could be done to do the

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:55 PM Shaun McCance wrote: > I don't disagree with anything you're saying. As long as there's an > easy way to get a list of issues with a specific label across all > projects (and projects in different groups?), then we'll figure it out. > And if

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:48 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I think we had > some rough consensus on this list that the primary missing enterprise > feature we need in the open source edition is rebase-style merge > requests. Was there anything else? > It looks like

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> wrote: > I hope that subscribers to an issue will receive a notification when a > mentioned issue is closed > To answer my own question: It looks like that's not the case, so anyone interested will nee

Re: I have realised the problem here

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:28 PM Diego Fernandez wrote: > However, there's a simple solution: > https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/15/alternatetab/ > Or simpler: $ gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.keybindings switch-applications "[]" $ gsettings set

Re: Bugzilla migration tool user accounts

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Carlos Soriano wrote: > commenting on behalf of users doesn't seem to be something as bad as I though > since > nobody mentioned that here so far :) If I understood correctly, rather than handling out temporary admin tokens to random people

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, 09:36 Carlos Soriano, wrote: > The shortcuts for example, would be good to have a shortcuts window as we > implemented recently at GNOME > The problem with those is of course that they are often not very discoverable themselves. Case in point, GitLab

Re: gjs 1.51.2

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Soriano wrote: > Yeah, I asked Andrea to do that two weeks ago for every project that moved > to GitLab, so I wondered what happened. I don't think the redirect will prevent people from - creating bugs via xmlrpc (`git bz file`) -

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:03 AM, wrote: > Specifically, I propose that > GNOME > be removed from the appstream metainfo for all of our apps except the > following four: > > * gnome-screenshot Why is that in the list? I would expect most users to use the various

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

Hey, On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Could also be that the actual bug in this case is that she shell should > not show Weather, World Clocks, etc. if these apps are not installed, or > not make it a link or something along those lines. That's indeed

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > >> 2. The user cannot install any other screenshot tool, unless they are >> also using X11 only, given that there is no unified screenshot >>

Re: Proposal for reducing the number of unremovable apps in GNOME Software

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Carlos Soriano wrote: > I actually had no idea about the shortcuts until recently, specifically for > screenshoting an area, so I would be slightly against this. If we had the > shorcuts window in GNOME Shell and the initial setup would show it

Re: GitLab update: Moving to the next step

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I'll add two more to Milan's list: > > (1) Canned replies. I would rather stay with Bugzilla forever than give up > canned replies. That is being tracked:

Re: Protected branches in GNOME's GitLab

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:30 PM Milan Crha wrote: > Does it mean, that an automatically created user in GNOME's GitLab > instance, basically a complete stranger, receives the Developer > privilege, even when it's a Reporter (in bugzilla terms)? No. In the GNOME group, only

Re: Release team now using gnome-build-meta repository, not JHBuild

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 6:06 PM, wrote: > When adding or removing a dependency from your > module, please now update gnome-build-meta instead. The BuildSteam page still mentions this: > In case you are trying to develop integrated components such as GNOME Shell, > GDM,

Re: Release team now using gnome-build-meta repository, not JHBuild

Oh my. I certainly did not intend to start a rant thread, sorry for that. To clarify: I am not complaining that RT is taking away my favorite toy. JHbuild is a great tool when it works, but it still breaks far too often for newcomers or non-regulars. And as you rightly point out, this is not

Re: [GitLab] Projects moved and 'tips of the week'

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Robert Ancell wrote: > You can also easily set up CI to build on multiple OSs (e.g. Ubuntu and > Fedora). But please take into consideration that resources are limited, so don't block everyone else's pipelines unless there are real

Re: GNOME 3.29.4 released

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 3:56 AM Javier Jardón wrote: > The list of updated modules and changes is available here: > > https://download.gnome.org/core/3.29/3.29.4/NEWS Looks like something went wrong, that list (and the list of sources) is full of versions from about a year ago ... Cheers,

Re: Release team now using gnome-build-meta repository, not JHBuild

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:34 PM, wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:25 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: >> >> Were you actually using JHBuild to run integrated system components >> (gnome-shell, gnome-session)? If so, how? I was not aware that that was even >> possible

Re: Retiring app menus - planning for 3.32.0

With regard to dropping the 'quit' action, is there any guidance for background applications? That is, apps where closing all windows does *not* exit the application, but the explicit 'quit' action does. Cheers, Florian ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

Re: Retiring app menus - planning for 3.32.0

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:00 PM Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 12:24 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > To be clear, I'm still thinking this through but, if you had a page > > in > > the user docs which was a simple table of keyboard shortcuts, which > > was one click away in the user

Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:57 AM Allan Day via desktop-devel-list wrote: >> An example of this biting us in the arse is that with 3.32 TopIcons is >> causing the CPU usage to run through the roof, and people are blaming the >> Shell for the CPU usage, not the extension, leaving our users with a

Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:38 PM Alexandre Franke wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:07 PM Britt Yazel wrote: > > I want to re-poen an old argument now that we have seen the effects of > > > > An example of this biting us in the arse is that with 3.32 > > TopIcons is causing the CPU usage to

Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:36 PM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list wrote: > > If the answer to status icons is to adopt/adapt the appindicator API, I'm > also fine with that; I'm not. The StatusNotifier spec is seriously flawed, and I don't want to support it unless at least the issues that

Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:50 PM Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > You cut the part where I said the appindicator implementation should be > changed. :-) I thought you were referring to the client library, not the underlying spec :-) Cheers, Florian ___

Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:42 AM Britt Yazel via desktop-devel-list wrote: > > I don't like not knowing if Telegram/Discord/Steam are still running after I > close them. [...] I'm not sure why exactly these apps don't show a running > indicator in the Dash for this use case. As far as the

Re: Good read from a new GNOME user

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:27 PM Allan Day wrote: > > > 4. Unnecessary notifications (e.g., "Application is ready") > > Indeed, my feeling is that those notifications do more harm than good. > I can't see an issue for this; does anyone know of one? There are several bugs in bugzilla, but IMHO the

Re: Issue running gnome-terminal in jhbuild

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:41 AM Leland Carlye via desktop-devel-list wrote: > > Hi!. I'm having this issue when building gnome-terminal in jhbuild (jhbuild > run gnome-terminal) in Ubuntu > > me@ubuntu:~/jhbuild/checkout/gnome-terminal$ jhbuild shell >

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:10 AM Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote: > > Specifically the Git master branch is a bit of a problem. I personally > think that "trunk" is a much better term, but I do not have _that_ much > of a problem with the word "master" in this context to do away with > convention. I

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:45 PM Carlos Soriano wrote: > >> For making this change properly, I have some questions: > - Is there a possibility to redirect master to any other name somehow? Oh, that is a good question. A quick search finds $ git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/mainline

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:58 AM Daniel Playfair Cal wrote: > > most tutorials do assume that the default branch is called master. For good reasons: It's used almost universally, so adding an additional vague "figure out how the main branch is called" step just adds needless complications. >

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:04 PM Bastien Nocera wrote: > > FWIW, "master copy" has quite a lot of synonyms that are used in other > languages and can be reused here, such as "copy zero", "original > (copy)", or in some uses "standard copy". "Branch zero" has a nice ring to it. (I think it's too

Re: Missing releases and state of 3.33.90

Hi, On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:24 PM Olav Vitters wrote: > > Further, gnome-shell 3.33.90 incorporates an gnome-desktop API/ABI (?) > change, but it doesn't actually check that gnome-desktop is new enough. That is because gnome-desktop is only required at runtime (via gobject-introspection) and

  1   2   >