Re: This video is dedicated to all of you

2018-10-17 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
I think everyone understands that users are the lifeblood of the GNOME project and that's why we're all here. However... On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 18:40 Nathan Graule via desktop-devel-list, < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > The problem is, all the public hears about GNOME is the project

Re: [GitLab] Fast CI is now available for all projects under gitlab.gnome.org

2018-11-16 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
Amazing! Thank you so much, everyone who helped make this happen! On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Philip Withnall wrote: > Great, thanks to Packet.net, OSU and the sysadmin/GitLab team! Let’s test > more things. > > On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 13:29 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > > We still have

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-27 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 4:13 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 10:27, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > GNOME has various core applications that depend on the same mechanism. We > actually made a point of integrating with remote

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-27 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > 2. It's not possible to discontinue support for services X, Y, and Z from > > GOA, and yank the rug out from under apps that expected (even if that > > expectation

Re: GNOME Online Accounts 3.34 won't have documents support

2019-01-28 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 00:00 Debarshi Ray, wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:26:05PM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > 2. It's not

Re: Please check your module is not using deprecated python2, gnome-common, intltool

2019-04-07 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:54 PM Javier Jardón wrote: (snip) > Python2 (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/103): > - mozjs60 (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388447) > I am not sure this will be possible for 3.34. It depends on Mozilla porting their build system

Re: Annual Gitlab Statistics, anyone?

2019-03-10 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:44 PM Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente via desktop-devel-list wrote: > Hi, > > Just a kick update and just wondering if there could be someone > interesting on moving this forward. > > I have updated the GrimoireLab instance, so now, you can filter activity > by project

Re: GitLab mirror considered harmful

2019-02-04 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 12:39 PM Alexandre Franke wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:58 PM Philip Chimento wrote: > > Could we take it all the way and just push the PR branch to > "$github_user_name/$branch_name" > > in the main repository on GitLab, and open a merge request > automatically, then

Re: GitLab mirror considered harmful

2019-02-04 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:37 AM Alberto Ruiz wrote: > I agree with Michael here, > > I think a lot of people just default to github and being there has value > in itself. The Pull Request is indeed a not so great situation and I think > we should think hard about making it easy for people who

Re: GJS Docs now Hosted on gnome.org

2019-07-11 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
Hi Anastasios! On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:18 AM Anastasios Lisgaras via desktop-devel-list wrote: > On 26/6/19 12:47 ??.??., Andre Klapper wrote:> Just for the records: > > > > In a perfect world, this would be onhttps://developer.gnome.org/ > > instead. > > I totally agree with you! > > On

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

2020-03-02 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:18 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:46 pm, Jordan Petridis via desktop-devel-list > wrote: > > No there isn't, it was working properly when it was first rolled out. > > I've started seen this issue today and looks like it only affecting > > some

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

2020-02-22 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:18 AM Bartłomiej Piotrowski < bpiotrow...@gnome.org> wrote: > On 19/02/2020 19.52, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Have you tested this? I've tried many times and afaik GitLab is simply > > incompatible with podman images. I don't remember the exact error > > message

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

2020-03-20 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 6:29 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:41 pm, Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list > wrote: > > Also, has anyone successfully gotten a CI job that uses lsan or asan > > to work in the unprivileged setup? (See my previ

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

2020-03-21 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:47 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:20 pm, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > Has anyone managed to get lsan/asan to work without CAP_SYS_PTRACE > > yet or otherwise have any suggestions on what would need to be done > > to support it in an

Re: Changes to GitLab runners configuration

2020-06-14 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:26 AM Jordan Petridis via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:56 AM, Michael Catanzaro < > mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 1:21 pm, Christian Hergert > > christ...@hergert.me wrote: > > > > >

Re: Can we enforce beta release for the freeze

2021-02-27 Thread Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-list
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:54 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list < desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > The release team can do "non maintainer" releases, of course; the problem > is, of course, that maintainers can be *very* protective of their fiefdoms, > so the release team has to wait