So long as GNOME provides the same experience when these technologies
are not present...
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Seif Lotfys...@lotfy.com wrote:
2009/8/19 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Seif Lotfys...@lotfy.com wrote:
Problem with
- Tracker finds relationships between data over content. Song A and Song
B are form Artist Y who is from the same hometown of Artsit X
- Zeitgeist finds relationships between data over usage. Last week
google.com and Project A were used alot together. So google is now in
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 17:40 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
1. what problems we want to solve for the user
Here some use cases I think that could be solved with some of those
shiny new technologies - but I'm not involved with any of tracker,
zeitgeist, couchdb, whatever, so I can't tell if they
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 00:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 00:36 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
We evaluated CouchDB as a primary store over sqlite, but CouchDB lacked
*very* important features. This makes it undoable. Feel free to get in
touch with us to discuss which precise features I mean.
I talked to some tracker people at
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 22:48, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Ivan Fradeivan.fr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 22:48, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:50 +0100, John Carr wrote:
CouchDB is also a storage but with a different philosophy. The nicest part
is the synchronization... but maybe we could wrap tracker in a similar
code to allow the online replication. This is just a wild guess.
I think its possible -
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:23 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
i also think there is some mileage in using couchdb as the primary store
and just have tracker index that. one of the strengths of couchdb is its
mvcc architecture which means its completely corruption proof as updates
are always
2009/8/19 Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:23 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
i also think there is some mileage in using couchdb as the primary store
and just have tracker index that. one of the strengths of couchdb is its
mvcc architecture which means its completely
Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:23 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
i also think there is some mileage in using couchdb as the primary store
and just have tracker index that. one of the strengths of couchdb is its
mvcc architecture which means its completely corruption proof as
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
and kernel apis before we answer the first question:
What is the user problem that we are
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Matthias
Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
and
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
and kernel apis before we answer
Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 17:01 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
Tracker the arguments are more complex; I think what they're
effectively arguing is not that one individual use case but more the
network effects from having all of them in one database (where did I
put that download from the email
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
and kernel apis before we answer
- Tracker finds relationships between data over content. Song A and Song
B are form Artist Y who is from the same hometown of Artsit X
- Zeitgeist finds relationships between data over usage. Last week
google.com and Project A were used alot together. So google is now in
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:02 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Matthias
Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:18 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
CouchDB: I don't really think it is needed. I'm not convinced - how many
times do I need to change email client. Without proper definition of
storage (such as FirstName vs. firstName vs ...) it won't help
we are defining the storage
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 00:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and
Problem with thinking of these tecnologies as what wil lit give the user is
a wrong approach IMHO. The 3 technologies provide developers of applications
standards and tools to provide better user experience. Unless the technology
has a client (Such as the Tracker Search uses the Tracker Storage)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 22:48, Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this recent discussion about tracker as a gnome module is
somewhat backwards. I don't think it is leading us anywhere to talk
about ontologies and rdf and events and timelines and metadata stores
and kernel
2009/8/19 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Seif Lotfys...@lotfy.com wrote:
Problem with thinking of these tecnologies as what wil lit give the user
is
a wrong approach IMHO.
'Designing' the next desktop by picking the cool-sounding technologies
23 matches
Mail list logo