I thought the whole point of having gtk-engines with all these engines
includes was to have one maintained module with everything included.
If its to just be a 'meta-module' with code dumped in from other places
I honestly do not see the point of it at all. I mean if you don't even
want smooth
Nuvola is today in gnome-themes-extras. I am going to move it into
gnome-themes if the maintainers of that package approve the move and
make a new final release of g-t-e without Nuvola.
This means that while it will not be the default theme for GNOME it
will be part of a default installation.
What would help the problem a lot is if debates go more into specific
sublists instead of going onto desktop-devel. One of the main reasons
for this is that for many sub-projects the relevant maintainers are not
on the relevant lists. I find it kinda pathetic for instance that
someone who
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:46 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 13:56 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
What would help the problem a lot is if debates go more into specific
sublists instead of going onto desktop-devel. One of the main
I guess a fair compromise would be to aim for using gtk 2.8 for 2.12,
but not using any new functionality in gtk 2.8. That way if it turns out
2.8 is not stable enough we can roll back to 2.6 before release. On the
other side it is stable enough then we ensure its gets widely
distributed and
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 14:47 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 19:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
- To be realistic, if GNOME-2.12 is released after GTK+-2.8,
most distributors are going to ship using them together.
So, the release team could decide to go with 2.6
Hi,
I don't have any theme choices there, only change option I have is
altering the size of the mouse cursor. I assume what Claessens have is
something like the mouse themes in windows where you can have lots of
really funky looking mouse pointers. If that is the case I think adding
it to the
I just knew you where a dedicated Delirium Tremens drinker :)
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 11:20 -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
I've branched off Totem 1.2 into the gnome-2-12 branch. Totem HEAD will
focus on GNOME 2.14 coolness, such as GStreamer 0.9 support and pink
elephants.
Cheers,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:17 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 01:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen escreveu:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hey,
The next releases of glib (HEAD and glib-2-8) will support a new debug
flag for the G_DEBUG
Hi,
Well Tim is working on just fixing Totem and gnome-media for 0.10
and will continue to do so for the next months at the minimum. Up to now
his progress have been slow due to having to port over plugins for 0.8
as part of his porting effort, but now that this is mostly taken care of
he can
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 11:27 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The problem is that the stuff that used to work doesn't anymore.
Well stuff that used to cause crashes in 0.8 doesn't anymore, so it goes
both ways.
And there are over 80 opened bugs against the Totem GStreamer backend,
most of them
Hi Vincent,
So the dual 0.8/0.10 thing for gnome-media has been discussed and our
opinion was that we didn't want Tim to waste time working on a dual
backend system when he already had a lot on his plate.
Personally I think we should make 2.13 releases using 0.10. If the
release team decide that
Hi,
Do we have a general performance problem currently? My Fedora Rawhide
(FC5) desktop is slow as hell atm. I thought at first it was a
distribution/development edition issue, but talking to people running
Dapper at the office they are experiencing the same.
One example, starting Totem for the
Hi,
While it would be good to get fixes and improvements right away I do
think its to hard to criticize anyone for holding back a bit on things
they are doing. Being able to ship something first is an important
marketing tool and this has happened before. In most cases where it has
happened the
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:36 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dan Winship
But it seems to me now that everyone other than me (and possibly Jono) is
actually talking about Xgl, and I have no comment on that.
(OTOH, if you really were saying that Novell's writing a replacement for
the
It is possible to run for instance 'gst-inspect-0.10' in the postinst
script to force the registry rebuild.
Christian
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 22:58 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Andy Wingo wrote:
There is no way to manually rebuild the registry in 0.10, so no more
post-installation hooks are
Ask and thou shall receive :)
- asf and multi-language .mkv/.ogm files still don't play, .mpg
functionality is still heavily limited although basic playback works
Edward (bilboed) ported the ffmpeg demuxers. All ffmpeg demuxers
including asf (and the weird game formats) now work. Including
Hi,
I think our thinking historically has been that distro's who really care
about GNOME don't really 'care' that much about our list of stuff in the
desktop release as they have a pretty good idea themselves what they
want/don't want. Distro's which don't care much about GNOME on the other
hand
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 11:59 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 01:28, Corey Burger wrote:
On 4/9/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elijah Newren wrote:
On 4/9/06, Scott J. Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only one who mouses over the applet to see
Hi,
As Mike mentioned in another mail I don't think there are anything major
affecting current applications apart from continuing improvements in
plugins and addition of more plugins to support more formats, protocols
and so on.
I think the most major planned changed is the USB device handling
Actually I have to say we should stop idealizing Apple that much, they
are a company which basically has gone from being the desktop leader to
today being a fringe player. They have survived partly by clinging onto
a couple of niches like graphical design and to some degree education.
They have
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 22:57 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Luis Villa
It's the growth and potential that worries me. :-)
They've had better software and better hardware than Windows for a full
five years, and have still not cracked 5% market share, so I don't see why
you're
I can't help but feel that this discussion about Avahi versus gupnp is
rather construed. Most application developers will go looking for either
of these technologies because they want to interoperate with a specific
set of non-GNOME devices. If you want your video player to be able to
send video
A topic that was discussed in the hallways in Gran Canaria is the fact
that GNOME has gone from not letting non-linux platforms hold back
development of features (ie. introduction of HAL) to making choices that
basically means we are abandoning any attempts of allowing GNOME to run
on non-linux
Hi,
FWIW, I've been advocating for a while that, for example, GStreamer
should aim to provide everything an application needs - ie. a complete
framework. This came up when Cheese was being ported from HAL to use
libgudev for device discovery. Now, the actual device interaction
already
I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping
the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making
products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3. If glib switched under us
it would make our license stability a bit of a joke. If someone wants to
use glib under
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:53 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 09/07/10 16:37, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping
the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot
The Committee for Internet Discussions and Heated Arguments (TCFIDAH)
would like to announce that we have decided to give out one of our most
coveted awards.
So let it be known we would like to give Felipe Contreras the 'oGalaxyo
Honorary Memorial award for Endurance in Online Arguing'
for his
28 matches
Mail list logo
