DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17952.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 00:33:10
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH move.html
Log:
Document some inherited attributes.
PR: 17952
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.6.2.7 +21 -1
bodewig 2003/03/19 00:41:29
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH
replaceregexp.html
Log:
Add another example to replaceregexp's docs.
PR: 17660
Submitted by: Jan Matèrne jan at materne dot de
Revision ChangesPath
No
bodewig 2003/03/19 00:42:14
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks replaceregexp.html
Log:
Merge fix for bug 17660 from 1.5 branch
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +20 -0 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/replaceregexp.html
Index: replaceregexp.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 00:53:08
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH loadproperties.html
Log:
Point to prefixlines filter.
PR: 17293
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.3 +7 -3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17293.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 01:11:11
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH genkey.html
Log:
Complete sentence with knowledge gained by raeding the source.
PR: 14697
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
bodewig 2003/03/19 01:11:57
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks genkey.html
Log:
Merge fix for bug 14697 from 1.5 branch
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +7 -2 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/genkey.html
Index: genkey.html
bodewig 2003/03/19 01:19:51
Modified:docs/manual Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH using.html
Log:
Add an extra note about properties values being irrelevant for if/unless.
PR: 14521
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14521.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 02:01:44
ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar - New directory
bodewig 2003/03/19 02:06:41
Added: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar TarEntryTest.java
Log:
Demonstrate bug 18105
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/tar/TarEntryTest.java
Index: TarEntryTest.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18105.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 02:09:38
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarEntry.java
Log:
TarEntry's File-constructor didn't work for many OSes.
PR: 18105
At the same time, make the OS check Locale independent.
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bodewig 2003/03/19 02:39:42
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH cab.html
Log:
Document that cab supports nested filesets
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.5.2.3 +8 -1
I'm sorry for this of-topic query, but I have a small problem which I
would hope someone in here could help me with...
the problem I have is that I have sofar not been able to get my own cvs
to mail out commit-info.. and since I see that it works in here, could
someone that hav acces to how
I'll send you the tarball privately..
Mvgr,
Martin
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 12:47, Christian Andersson wrote:
I'm sorry for this of-topic query, but I have a small problem which I
would hope someone in here could help me with...
the problem I have is that I have sofar not been able to get my
+1
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:
Hi,
This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and
user
lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone is free to vote but only
committer
votes are binding.
Ant 1.6 will require JDK 1.2 to compile and
conor 2003/03/19 05:43:32
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH ejb.html
Log:
Fix typo in docs
PR: 18091
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.23.2.17 +2 -2
conor 2003/03/19 05:49:18
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks ejb.html
Log:
Missing merge from 1.5 branch :-(
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +3 -2 ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks/ejb.html
Index: ejb.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
-0 and +1 on doing it after 1.6. I think this is a majority vote,
isn't it?
:-). I guess so, although I'd like to see consensus anyway. Your -0 isn't a
veto, in any case. Do you have some reservations? Is it just a timing issue?
+1 on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support
Hi,
This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and
user
lists. Please indicate your vote.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
-0 and +1 on doing it after 1.6. I think this is a majority vote,
isn't it?
Your -0 isn't a veto, in any case.
I know, and I wouldn't want it to be one.
Do you have some
+1,
and about freaking time too... :)
Conor MacNeill wrote:
Hi,
This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and user
lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone is free to vote but only committer
votes are binding.
Ant 1.6 will require JDK 1.2 to compile and build.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 22:45
Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support
Hi,
This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and
user
lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone is free to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Steve Loughran wrote:
+1
At the same time, I dont see a need to run into refactoring everything we
have today to move up to 1.2 support, 'just because we can'. It'll make it
that much harder to back port patches to the 1.5.x codebase
+1 on your comment ( and a preemptive -1 on changing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Given the above, there are no reasons to limit the 1.6 code base from
*any* change that's JDK 1.2 (Java 2) compatible. That includes moving
everything to the Java 2 Collections.
As long as you don't break the public API.
There are quite a few places where Hashtables
Steve Loughran wrote:
I don't see reasons to try to back-port fixes made on 1.6 to the 1.5.
Only
bugs identified by people running JDK 1.1 should make it to the 1.5
branch.
This should be the only activity going on in that 1.5 branch.
to date we are putting fixes to the 1.5 branch into 1.5.x,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18171.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
40 matches
Mail list logo
