DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jhm 2004/01/20 22:50:55
Modified:xdocsexternal.xml
docs external.html
Log:
Typo in CocoonTask
Revision ChangesPath
1.114 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/external.xml
Index: external.xml
jhm 2004/01/20 22:55:58
Modified:xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.xml
docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.html
Log:
Sync with HEAD: Typo in CocoonTask
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.100.2.5
Corrected
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:51 PM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: [ANN] Cocoon Task
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done.
Fab. But (and I see that this was my mistake) - there's a
typo:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm trying to create a custom ant task that I can call from my build
scripts. Right now I'm just trying to figure out how to write a task
that can accept a fileset and iterate through all valid files. My best
guess so far is below.
Unfortunately, this is giving me errors that I have not
Means that there is no method with your signature. Provided method is:
public DirectoryScanner getDirectoryScanner(Project p)
I recommend downloading the src-distro and looking into the sources while
programming
tasks.
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Mark McKay [mailto:[EMAIL
Mark McKay wrote:
I'm trying to create a custom ant task that I can call from my build
scripts. Right now I'm just trying to figure out how to write a task
that can accept a fileset and iterate through all valid files. My
best guess so far is below.
Unfortunately, this is giving me errors
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:44 pm, Mark McKay wrote:
I'm trying to create a custom ant task that I can call from my build
scripts. Right now I'm just trying to figure out how to write a task
that can accept a fileset and iterate through all valid files. My best
guess so far is below.
Mark,
FYI.
Jan
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.jsp?thread_id=23426
Opinion: Complex build systems need a real language
Posted By: Dion Almaer on January 20, 2004 @ 11:13 AM
Jon Tirsen talks about a Java project that he was working on that had a very
complicated build system. He started off
Conor MacNeill wrote:
Mark,
Peter and Jan look to have figured out your compile issue. I would recommend,
however, that you reconsider using MatchingTask. It was the way early Ant
tasks were implements but it is not ideal. A better approach would be to use
an addFileset(FileSet fs) method and
Maybe the second tutorial (not finished yet) would help you.
Tutorial on [1] and sources on [2]. Especially the part about filesets [3].
Jan
[1]
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/docs/manual/tutorial-tasks-
filesets-properties.html?content-type=text%2Fplain
[2]
Gus Heck wrote:
My non-non commiter vote:
[ ] +1 Bugzilla sucks - go to Jira
[x] -1 BugZilla rocks - if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Oh, this is good.
I agree with you; bug entry is critical.
When we used Rational ClearQuest, I once spent 30 minutes filling in
some inordinately complex form
According to the last entry, they are currently
using a 45,000 line ant script =-O
which one of the team is reducing to ~700 lines by
using a custom dependency task.
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI.
Jan
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.jsp?thread_id=23426
Opinion: Complex build systems
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Try something like this (
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Enumeration;
import java.util.Vector;
import org.apache.tools.ant.BuildException;
import org.apache.tools.ant.DirectoryScanner;
import org.apache.tools.ant.Task;
import org.apache.tools.ant.Project;
antoine 2004/01/21 04:55:53
Modified:docs/manual/OptionalTasks clearcase.html
docs/manual tasksoverview.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs defaults.properties
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26308.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26310.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the last entry, they are currently
using a 45,000 line ant script =-O
which one of the team is reducing to ~700 lines by
using a custom dependency task.
I didn't read all the thread completely, but I heartedly
agree with Peter that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26312.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26242.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25345.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
---BeginMessage---
I've read the noted documentation on the manifest format. The problem is
I'm not generating this manigest - ant is. And i'm getting class not found
errors from the results.
If i explode the jar, edit the manifest by hand to put it all on one line,
even tho that's against
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26310.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26299.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the last entry, they are currently
using a 45,000 line ant script =-O
which one of the team is reducing to ~700 lines by
using a custom dependency task.
I didn't read
Peter Reilly wrote:
Subject:
Ant bug# 26300
From:
Adam Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:04:24 -0600
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've read the noted documentation on the manifest format. The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26300.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I tend to sympathize with the assertion since certainly as my build scripts
have grown in complexity, I have found that I would greatly benefit from the
same structuring functionality commonly found in general purpose scripting
languages that support modularity, reuse and extension, but that are
37 matches
Mail list logo
