requires Java 8, thus we need to ship two JRE versions.
Thanks,
Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Ekaterina Dimitrova
Sent: Donnerstag, 26. August 2021 16:35
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap
Hi everyone,
I had a few people asking me recently about
Apologize, seems I sent the tickets and didn’t see the last mail from
Enrico which arrived in the meantime.
I will check the link, thanks for sharing!
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 9:17, Brandon Williams wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could
> be a natural fit
Thanks for pointing this out, Enrico! It looks like Cassandra could
be a natural fit here since it's already using OpenJDK quite a bit.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:47 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> (sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here)
>
> What about joining the
Thank you all for your valuable feedback.
I just created below two tickets to facilitate the outcome of the
discussion:
- CASSANDRA-16894 - Java 11 support - remove the experimental flag
- CASSANDRA-16895 - Support Java 17
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 8:47, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> (sorry if being
(sorry if being slightly off-topic, but let be throw this ball here)
What about joining the OpenJDK Quality outreach program?
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach
Many other Apache projects contribute to that initiative and this helps
Java to be always compatible with
+1 on my side too for removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to
11+17
Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 22:28, Nate McCall a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Last but not least, do we know anyone running Java 11 in production?
> > This thread was really opened as a stage to share our thoughts and
> >
>
>
> Last but not least, do we know anyone running Java 11 in production?
> This thread was really opened as a stage to share our thoughts and
> hopefully come up with a plan as a community.
>
I am aware of many large deployments using Java11 and 4.0 in production. +1
on making this non
+1 from me on both as well.
> On Aug 26, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
>
>> Em qui., 26 de ago. de 2021 às 14:40, Brandon Williams
>> escreveu:
>>
>> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk
+1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
Em qui., 26 de ago. de 2021 às 14:40, Brandon Williams
escreveu:
> +1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:35 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I and
+1 to both removal of experimental for 11, and moving trunk to 11+17
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:35 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> >
> > I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production,
> > have found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re
> > able to
>
> I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production,
> have found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re
> able to jump on and contribute development + review resources to resolve in
> the project.
>
That's everything I need to hear. Let's remove
+1 for moving Java 11 support out of experimental for 4.0 at minimum, and no
concern with doing so for 3.0/3.11 if someone were to propose.
I and contributors I work with have deployed 4.0 + JDK11 in production, have
found no issues, and would treat any issues that arise as ones we’re able to
One of the things I'm excited about with the 4+ releases is this running with
Java 17+ (including ZGC) so I would love to see this get more serious testing
and validation.
Anecdotal account - at an event a couple of years ago, I spoke to someone from
an education software company was running
Hi everyone,
I had a few people asking me recently about the Java 11 support.
I came across this thread we had last year -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r38f6beaa22e247cb38212f476f5f79efdc6587f83af0397406c06d7c%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E
.
I think we have all tests running in both
14 matches
Mail list logo
