Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same
way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the
benchmark
is
running.
Does this make sense?
On 7/29/11 3:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same
way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the
benchmark
is
Hello.
I'm willing to help on this if you want.
What do you propose?
Meanwhile, have you had a
look to existing frameworks, such as japex (http://japex.java.net/)?
[...]
I hadn't; I have now. It looks nice. I didn't think of something as
elaborate (charts, etc.) but rather a small utility
Le 27/07/11 12:05, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
I'm willing to help on this if you want.
What do you propose?
You mentioned the need for people to review/try the piece of code you've
posted. I haven't done yet, but I'm happy to.
As for japex being too heavy. I agree, I didn't realize it
Hi.
I'm willing to help on this if you want.
What do you propose?
You mentioned the need for people to review/try the piece of code
you've posted. I haven't done yet, but I'm happy to.
Yes, please try it, and report unexpected results. Thank you!
[I'll send you the Java file in a separate
On 7/26/11 3:52 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same
way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the
benchmark
is
Hi Gilles,
- Mail original -
Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same
way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the
Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same
way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the
benchmark
is
running.
Hi,
I'm willing to help on this if you want. Meanwhile, have you had a look
to existing frameworks, such as japex (http://japex.java.net/)?
Also, there is some interesting stuff on the web
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-benchmark1/index.html
I have other electronic papers,
- Mail original -
Hello.
Hi Gilles,
Finding myself repeatedly writing the same few lines when trying to
figure
out which of several implementations of some functionality was
running
faster, I wonder wether it would be interesting to add a little
utility in
the test section of
Hello.
[...]
The idea is to have interleaved calls to the candidate
implementations, so
that (hopefully) they will be penalized (or benefit) in the same way
by what
the JVM is doing (GC or JIT compilation or ...) while the benchmark
is
running.
Does this make sense?
11 matches
Mail list logo