Jason submitted his patch [1], what should we do? apply or leave it?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-239
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/11/14 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le
Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
From all the log4j talks I gave recently there were zero people using
commons-logging. For me it is dead.
For what it's worth, the install base of commons-logging in Debian is
ten times the one of slf4j, and there is no sign of it declining:
2013/11/14 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
From all the log4j talks I gave recently there were zero people using
commons-logging. For me it is dead.
For what it's worth, the install base of commons-logging in Debian is
ten times the one
On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 10/11/2013 21:46, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
From all the log4j talks I gave recently there were zero people using
commons-logging. For me it is dead.
For what it's worth, the install base of commons-logging in Debian is
ten times the
it).
Thomas
Gary
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Date:11/10/2013 15:46 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
On 10 Nov 2013, at 21:24, henrib wrote:
Would you share why
Subject: RE: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it does not
force the choice of the implementation library.
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging
...@apache.org
Date:11/09/2013 12:23 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it
does not
force the choice of the implementation library.
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache
Would you share why ? I'm sure it would be beneficial to others (including
the commons logging community).
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656667.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
thought, sorry. Hope you understand a bit better
why I can't support commons-logging going into OGNL. If any more
questions please shout.
Cheers
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656667.html
Sent from
Well said Christian.
Gary
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Date:11/10/2013 15:46 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
On 10 Nov 2013, at 21:24, henrib wrote:
Would you
.
Cheers
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656667.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-Original Message-
From: Lukasz Lenart
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 12:08
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
Now I need a sed script to
thought, sorry. Hope you understand a bit better
why I can't support commons-logging going into OGNL. If any more
questions please shout.
Cheers
Christian
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656667.html
Sent
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it does not
force the choice of the implementation library.
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656625.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing
Log4j 2?
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
Date:11/09/2013 13:53 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
On 9 Nov 2013, at 18:23, henrib wrote:
IMHO, commons logging is the best
Neither does log4j 2 ;)
Original message
From: henrib hen...@apache.org
Date:11/09/2013 12:23 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it does not
force the choice
On 7 November 2013 17:08, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it...
Is
-Original Message-
From: Lukasz Lenart
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 10:23
2013/11/5 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On 5 Nov 2013, at 14:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
So what's the idea here? Should we apply additional
logging layer (as
Jason proposed)? Or throw
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it...
Is Log4j2 the one that is desired? I figured SLF4J was going to be the
jpye...@pdinc.us:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme
:
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
I found 11 uses
2013/11/5 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
On 5 Nov 2013, at 14:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
So what's the idea here? Should we apply additional logging layer (as
Jason proposed)? Or throw it away and start thinking about new
release?
I have reviewed TODOs and I haven't spotted any
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad.
Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to
System.err for some reason.
In addition there are a lot of System.out's, but those are all commented
and seem to
2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad.
Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to
System.err for some reason.
In addition there are a lot of
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org
2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad.
Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to
System.err for some reason.
In addition there are a lot of System.out's, but those are all commented
and seem to have served debugging purposes.
I believe small libs
26 matches
Mail list logo
