[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.

[collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions: - there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code level to Java 1.6 would allow the use of @Override in more places (instead

Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread sebb
On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions:  - there is still lots of javadoc missing, moving the source code

Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread Gary Gregory
I am +1 to all your proposed changes. Gary On Jun 24, 2012, at 5:29, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions: - there is still

Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Are we going through that Java 5 vs Java 6 discussion again? ;) Thomas: I always wanted to work on collections but there hasn't been much activity since I joined the ML. I'd be happy to contribute some patches. Benedikt Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 24.06.2012 um 14:10 schrieb Gary Gregory

Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread Adrian Crum
On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk to make it a candidate for a release and would like to ask a few questions: - there is still lots of

Re: [collections] Cleanup of trunk

2012-06-24 Thread sebb
On 24 June 2012 13:42, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote: On 6/24/2012 12:25 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 10:28, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I recently started to work more on collections and cleaning up the trunk to make it a candidate for a

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote: Looks like only the relatively

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread sebb
On 24 June 2012 15:12, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread sebb
On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/17/12

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 17/06/2012

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/06/2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote: Nexus does not prevent any of this; it is a staging repo. It does block what used to be a simple, controlled process 0) generate, test and sign artifacts locally 1) upload to p.a.o 2) vote 3) move to release

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/24/12 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 24/06/2012 20:41, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote: Nexus does not prevent any of this; it is a staging repo. It does block what used to be a simple, controlled process 0) generate, test and sign artifacts locally 1) upload to

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread sebb
On 24 June 2012 20:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jxpath (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-06-24 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [pool] 2.0 release

2012-06-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/24/12 3:29 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 20:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 12:00 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 June 2012 15:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/12 7:12 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb: On 23 June 2012 23:00,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-06-24 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1353140 - /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/util/Incrementor.java

2012-06-24 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, Exactly: If a user does not care about the callback, he shouldn't even have to look at the second constructor, even less wonder about the consequence of setting it to null. Well, it could also be argued that default parameters are *evil* (I do think they are), and that explicitly