On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the release notes):
Fixed Bugs:
o LOGGING-124:
FYI: Craig is fine with having his authors tags removed from BeanUtils (and
any other Apache source code)
I'll make the necessary changes this weekend.
2013/3/6 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar
Le 2013-03-07 10:05, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on
RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the
Hi Simo
Thanks for confirming. Very much appreciated.
Regards
Felix
Am 06.03.2013 um 16:16 schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Felix!
indeed, we are putting effort on NOT breaking the backwards
compatibility with 1.2.X, we updated to version 1.3 - due to some APIs
update - and I personally
I have create BEANUTILS-432 [1] for this.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-432
2013/3/6 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 06.03.2013 13:35, schrieb sebb:
On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I have recently learned that
thoughts? :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all mates,
I am going to drop the 'tasks' page[1] since TODOs
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, luc l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Le 2013-03-07 10:05, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com**wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release
OK by me
On 7 March 2013 11:29, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
thoughts? :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Simone Tripodi
Good, cleaning it right now :)
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
OK by me
On 7 March 2013 11:29, Simone Tripodi
Remember there is a -Ptest-deploy profile that can be used to test
what will be deployed.
This puts the output in target/deploy
I've found it's sometimes necessary to use package as well as
deploy to ensure everything is included in the deploy phase.
On 7 March 2013 11:36, Thomas Neidhart
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:34, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars
+1
Gary
- any objections?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
OK by me.
On 7 March 2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
On 7 March 2013 12:33, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
OK to change Checkstyle/PMD to eliminate warnings.
But I would avoid rewrapping to the new line length unless it's
obviously easier to read.
On 7 March 2013 15:05, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 15:05:17 2013
New Revision: 1453909
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453909
Log:
checkstyle: PackageHtml module no longer needed, package documentation moved
from package.html to package-info.java
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
Opinions?
-1
build-gump.xml is
On 07/03/2013 12:33, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
I prefer 80 but I don't do anywhere near enough work on FileUpload for
my views to carry much weight.
Mark
On 7 March 2013 12:52, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 12:52:04 2013
New Revision: 1453831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453831
Log:
checkstyle: Avoid inline conditionals.
I think Checkstyle is wrong in this case.
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make
On 07/03/2013 15:43, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related
OK to change Checkstyle/PMD to eliminate warnings.
But I would avoid rewrapping to the new line length unless it's
obviously easier to read.
sure, just to suppress warnings, no more additional work intended
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
Is there a check to ensure package-info.java exists?
yes, just plugged, it is the module name=JavadocPackage/
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
If so, that would surely satisfy the dependencies?
Sure, but that wasn't what was being proposed.
Big
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
If so, that would surely satisfy the
Hi,
after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
imlementation of this JRE.
Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
backing map), but some are more serious and would also require that certain
tests to be disabled when run with an
On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
imlementation of this JRE.
Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
backing map), but some are more serious and would also require
Thomas,
the web page indicates. i'd suggest doing that to see if it helps
* Post a message on the Java Runtimes and SDKs Java Runtimes and SDKs Forum.
* Send an email directly to us at our Java Tools email.
-- dims
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the
TreeMap
imlementation of this JRE.
Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry
On 7 March 2013 16:16, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven
Done, but it will take some while to find out if the changes are
correct, as Gump runs take several days at present.
There's a problem that causes the Maven repo proxy to hang sometimes.
See Gump list for details
I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
$Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Benedikt
2013/3/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
I'm a bit short on time right now. I'll
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the release notes):
Fixed Bugs:
o LOGGING-124: The jar manifest now contains
I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
$Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Consistency is IMHO a good thing, and in that specific case I'd go
ahead for $Id$ only
my 2
2013/3/7 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
$Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Consistency is IMHO a good thing, and in
Hi,
I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
J9VM - 20121024_126067
JIT -
On 03/07/2013 11:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT enabled, AOT
On 03/07/2013 11:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, the logic in WeakHashtable is flawed, as it relies on the queue
to purge elements from the table. When considering for example the
elements method:
public Enumeration elements() {
purge();
return super.elements();
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
Log:
Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords
-1
Please don't use $Date$ - it is
On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
Log:
Add JavaDoc and SVN
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2013 13:25, brit...@apache.org wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the release
On 7 March 2013 18:36, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 18:36:15 2013
New Revision: 1453990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453990
Log:
Fix first step in release howto.
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/doc/release/release.howto.txt
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 19:29, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 19:29:41 2013
New Revision: 1454037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454037
Log:
Exclude download cgi from source distribution.
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/assembly/src.xml
Modified:
On 7 March 2013 19:52, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Thu Mar 7 19:52:39 2013
New Revision: 1454057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454057
Log:
releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in
Hi,
Niall, thanks for stepping in for me. It felt harsh to me too to see the
veto, especially when having the the committers guide [1] in mind that
states
In extreme situations, it may be necessary to veto (-1) a commit but
please beware that this is an extreme sanction and rarely warranted.
This
releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in parent, or
does it have a different function?
If so, it should have a different name.
to be merged in the one defined in the parent - IIUC the parent in RC
doesn't provide the
On 03/08/2013 01:25 AM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared
On 03/08/2013 01:45 AM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 18:36, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 18:36:15 2013
New Revision: 1453990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453990
Log:
Fix first step in release howto.
Modified:
On 03/08/2013 01:49 AM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2013 19:29, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 7 19:29:41 2013
New Revision: 1454037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454037
Log:
Exclude download cgi from source distribution.
Modified:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
These nested if
52 matches
Mail list logo
