[math] releasing 3.2, strange problem with apache-rat-plugin

2013-03-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, When I generate the site from the current trunk, I get a rat report with several missing headers. These errors correspond mainly to the test files (and one MANIFEST file from the special functions validation part). This is strange because I have fixed these problems one or two weeks ago,

Re: [math] releasing 3.2, strange problem with apache-rat-plugin

2013-03-29 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/29/13 7:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, When I generate the site from the current trunk, I get a rat report with several missing headers. These errors correspond mainly to the test files (and one MANIFEST file from the special functions validation part). This is strange because I

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-27 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-27 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-27 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM,

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-27 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/27/13 8:13 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart

[Math] MATH-917 (Was: [math] releasing 3.2?)

2013-03-26 Thread Gilles
[...] There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917). I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback. It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame would be:

Re: [Math] MATH-917 (Was: [math] releasing 3.2?)

2013-03-26 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/26/2013 01:38 PM, Gilles wrote: [...] There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917). I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback. It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be resolved soon. What seems to be

Re: [Math] MATH-917 (Was: [math] releasing 3.2?)

2013-03-26 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/26/2013 08:07 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 03/26/2013 01:38 PM, Gilles wrote: [...] There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917). I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback. It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-26 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-25 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at least one bug with no fix target

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-23 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). There is at least one contribution requiring

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/10/13 12:20 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 10/03/2013 19:47, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-11 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 11/03/2013 00:47, sebb a écrit : On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? There are 3

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-11 Thread sebb
On 11 March 2013 08:33, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Le 11/03/2013 08:51, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Le 11/03/2013 00:47, sebb a écrit : On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? There are 3 Clirr errors: Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to org.apache.commons.math3.dfp.Dfp Error Method 'protected

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Gary Gregory
That means 4.0 and all that entails (Maven coords and package change) or fix the Clirr errors. Gary On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math]

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? There are 3 Clirr errors: Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/10/2013 05:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? There are 3 Clirr errors: Error Return type of method 'public int

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Phil, Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/10/13 10:56 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi Phil, Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 10/03/2013 19:47, Phil Steitz a écrit : On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To

[math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Luc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Gilles
Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917). Releasing would be

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit : Hello. Hi Gilles, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? Say next week for example. There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). I'll

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org wrote: Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit : Hello. Hi Gilles, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? Say next week for example. There are many unresolved issues

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: Hello. I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? How soon? There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2. There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936). I did look

Re: [math] releasing 3.2?

2013-03-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon. Any thoughts about it? Maybe somebody wants to take a look at MATH-891. I created a patch but was unsure about it due to the dynamic cast. Thomas