Hi all,
When I generate the site from the current trunk, I get a rat report with
several missing headers. These errors correspond mainly to the test
files (and one MANIFEST file from the special functions validation part).
This is strange because I have fixed these problems one or two weeks
ago,
On 3/29/13 7:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
When I generate the site from the current trunk, I get a rat report with
several missing headers. These errors correspond mainly to the test
files (and one MANIFEST file from the special functions validation part).
This is strange because I
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many
On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM,
On 3/27/13 8:13 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/13 12:03 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 03/26/2013 11:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart
[...]
There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback
(MATH-917).
I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will
be
resolved soon. What seems to be achievable in a short time frame
would be:
On 03/26/2013 01:38 PM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917).
I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817 will be
resolved soon. What seems to be
On 03/26/2013 08:07 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 03/26/2013 01:38 PM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917).
I have added a first patch and would love to get some feedback.
It seems we are really close to releasing now. I guess MATH-817
On 3/25/13 8:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at
Hi all,
Le 23/03/2013 16:30, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
There is at least one contribution requiring
On 3/10/13 12:20 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 10/03/2013 19:47, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
Le 11/03/2013 00:47, sebb a écrit :
On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
There are 3
On 11 March 2013 08:33, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 11/03/2013 08:51, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Le 11/03/2013 00:47, sebb a écrit :
On 10 March 2013 16:35, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
There are 3 Clirr errors:
Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to
org.apache.commons.math3.dfp.Dfp
Error Method 'protected
That means 4.0 and all that entails (Maven coords and package change) or
fix the Clirr errors.
Gary
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math]
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
There are 3 Clirr errors:
Error Return type of method 'public int log10()' has been changed to
On 03/10/2013 05:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 10/03/2013 15:28, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
There are 3 Clirr errors:
Error Return type of method 'public int
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi Phil,
Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 3/10/13 10:56 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Phil,
Le 10/03/2013 18:28, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Le 10/03/2013 19:47, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 3/10/13 11:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/4/13 4:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
There is at least one contribution requiring some feedback (MATH-917).
Releasing would be
Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
Hello.
Hi Gilles,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
Say next week for example.
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
I'll
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luc Maisonobe l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Le 04/03/2013 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
Hello.
Hi Gilles,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
Say next week for example.
There are many unresolved issues
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Gilles gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
How soon?
There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
I did look
On 03/04/2013 01:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
Any thoughts about it?
Maybe somebody wants to take a look at MATH-891.
I created a patch but was unsure about it due to the dynamic cast.
Thomas
31 matches
Mail list logo