On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
I'm -0.9 (see http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html) on
switching to Confluence. The choice of wiki technology is a tiny
factor, in my opinion. No wiki is useful without active maintenance.
Unless there's a horde
On 19 May 2013 08:57, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
1) Yes! Let's get the docs/ sorted out! Moving NEWS/CHANGES into them.
Moving CouchDB: The Definitive Guide into them. Incorporating the docs
into
our
The documentation in the source is a great idea, and it's great having it in
Futon. In my opinion the wiki is superfluous and should be removed.
My 2 cents.
-Filippo
Quick response:
1) Yes! Let's get the docs/ sorted out! Moving NEWS/CHANGES into them.
Moving CouchDB: The Definitive Guide into them. Incorporating the docs into
our merge and release procedure. Drumming up a docs team! (Dave! Dirkjan!
Alexander! All the exclamation points!)
2) We will always
I'd prefer to have quality docs in the source code / .rst files if
possible. Wikis are ok for evolving stuff but if it's actually usage of
CouchDB proper, in the source is the way to go. You get history directly
tied to source code / release versions for free too.
I love having the manual
On 1 May 2013 20:50, Paul Okstad poks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello dev team,
I'm following up on a brief discussion I had with the CouchDB twitter
account (my handle: @pokstad) regarding the official ASF wiki for CouchDB.
I'm a CouchDB evangelist in both my personal projects and at my full
Anyway, I'm really excited about CouchDB and I really want to contribute to
the global documentation out there, but MoinMoin ain't making it easy. I
really think that a move to a better documentation tool could be a huge
push to CouchDB's adoption. Thanks for listening.
Have you seen the new
I'm definitely in favour of building up the docs/ effort to replace
the wiki as *the* place to find out how couchdb works. I can't quite
picture what will be left of the wiki when that's achieved. I guess
the pages where we list contributors and couchdb-based projects, but
not too much else.
I'm
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:58:44PM -0700, Jens Alfke wrote:
I agree; it's pretty unpleasant to use. I've been contributing to it
intermittently for over a year but it's always a chore.
+1
[snip]
We use Confluence internally at Couchbase, but in practice people don't seem
very happy with
Hello dev team,
I'm following up on a brief discussion I had with the CouchDB twitter
account (my handle: @pokstad) regarding the official ASF wiki for CouchDB.
I'm a CouchDB evangelist in both my personal projects and at my full time
job at a large engineering company (not Atlassian, lol). When
On May 1, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Paul Okstad
poks...@gmail.commailto:poks...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe part of the reason for the lack of documentation is the lack
luster moinmoin wiki.
I agree; it's pretty unpleasant to use. I've been contributing to it
intermittently for over a year but it's
11 matches
Mail list logo
