Re: [RT] crawl our dynamic forrest rather than commandline

2005-09-02 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote: ... Perhaps i am not explaining my concept very well. Anyway, i have a new one. Forget wget and use our own Cocoon capabilities. I wonder if we can make a special pipeline in Forrest that does the following: * crawls the dynamic server (i.e. crawls itself) *

Re: [views] xsl:comment in templates

2005-09-02 Thread Diwaker Gupta
Alright, so I've isolated the bug to skins/common/xslt/html/strip_namespaces.xsl Commenting it out brings back the comments. A comment in sitemap.xmap says it was introduced due to a bug in Cocoon: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35348 I couldn't find any new information on

Re: [RT] crawl our dynamic forrest rather than commandline

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: David Crossley wrote: ... Perhaps i am not explaining my concept very well. Anyway, i have a new one. Forget wget and use our own Cocoon capabilities. I wonder if we can make a special pipeline in Forrest that does the following: * crawls the dynamic

Re: [views] xsl:comment in templates

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Diwaker Gupta wrote: Alright, so I've isolated the bug to skins/common/xslt/html/strip_namespaces.xsl Commenting it out brings back the comments. A comment in sitemap.xmap says it was introduced due to a bug in Cocoon: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35348 I couldn't

Re: Forrest-lenya instance

2005-09-02 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 13:07 +1000, David Crossley wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Does that need a publication? Hmm, to be bloody honest with you, my intend is to implement Ross idea of getting forrest devs started with lenya. I personally see too much work and effort that is

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Let's not be driven by fear, but by opportunity... and let's look at history. Our open access to Cocoon and Lenya has never given us issues. By the way, Lenya do not currently have access to our SVN, only Cocoon. Instead we have gained Antonio and Unico's

Re: Forrest-lenya instance

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Thorsten Scherler wrote: For the task at hand, yes. The main reason is to have a whiteboard to assist us with the XHTML move. The secondary reason is to have a Lenya instance so that later we can enhance our Lenya input plugin. I don't want to see this first ForrestTuesday turn

Re: Forrest-lenya instance

2005-09-02 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 18:42 +1000, David Crossley wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: For the task at hand, yes. The main reason is to have a whiteboard to assist us with the XHTML move. The secondary reason is to have a Lenya instance so that later we can enhance our Lenya input

[jira] Updated: (FOR-184) Switch to XHTML2

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-184?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-184: --- Description: Switch to using XHTML2 as a base and intermediate format. This means also using RelaxNG validations, new sitemap pipelines, new stylesheets, new

[jira] Updated: (FOR-659) Fully enable XHTML2 in the core

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-659?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-659: --- Fix Version: 0.8-dev Description: - Decide how to make the pipeline process. Now we have body-*.html and stuff, but a simpler process should be devised. ... Do

[jira] Updated: (FOR-654) Create Schema for XHTML2 subset

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-654?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-654: --- Fix Version: 0.8-dev Description: We need a RelaxNG schema for the subset of XHTML identified in:

[jira] Updated: (FOR-657) Move XDoc processing to an Input plugin

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-657?page=all ] David Crossley updated FOR-657: --- Fix Version: 0.8-dev Version: 0.8-dev Move XDoc processing to an Input plugin --- Key: FOR-657

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Tim Williams
On 9/2/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Let's not be driven by fear, but by opportunity... and let's look at history. Our open access to Cocoon and Lenya has never given us issues. By the way, Lenya do not currently have access to our SVN, only

Re: menu context without a site.xml entry

2005-09-02 Thread Tim Williams
On 9/1/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Williams wrote: How can one get the menu to maintain some context with no entry in site.xml? With the current system, i don't think we can. That is specifically mentioned at [1] below. For example, if the uri is

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Tim Williams wrote: ... I can only imagine that for an existing committer on another project, the bar would likely be set pretty low for a committership offer anyway -- so asking them to add a JIRA issue and and contribute a patch to determine whether they're truly committed to forrest or

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 12:44 -0400, Tim Williams wrote: I don't understand why Lenya for instance, votes me a committer on their project. You are *not* a committer to lenya! Nobody voted you in. You have write access to the code base which is different. IMO the subject is not reflecting this (I

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Tim Williams
On 9/2/05, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 12:44 -0400, Tim Williams wrote: I don't understand why Lenya for instance, votes me a committer on their project. You are *not* a committer to lenya! Nobody voted you in. You have write access to the code base

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Tim Williams wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Tim Williams wrote: I don't understand why Lenya for instance, votes me a committer on their project. You are *not* a committer to lenya! Nobody voted you in. You have write access to the code base which is different. IMO the subject is

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Tim Williams wrote: David Crossley wrote: Anyway, i just want to ensure that we all, especially our new PMC members, understand the implications. This new PMC member doesn't see the value in it as I attempted to express in my earlier mail on this topic. I don't believe in the field

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 10:18 +1000, David Crossley wrote: ... As i said earlier in this thread, this is not the normal practise. It is a new experiment between the Cocoon-based projects. Not so new after all for lenya/cocoon. I (and all other initial lenya committer) got 2003 this rights. Every

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
Thorsten Scherler wrote: David Crossley wrote: ... As i said earlier in this thread, this is not the normal practise. It is a new experiment between the Cocoon-based projects. Not so new after all for lenya/cocoon. I (and all other initial lenya committer) got 2003 this rights. Still

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread addi
Ok, I am not a PMC member nor committer so ignore/listen as you like. Also if I seem riled up, please take my general attitude with a grain of salt as Katrina/lack of response to has gotten me rather upset lately. I do not mean to offend at all. On Friday September 02 2005 8:42 pm, David

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
addi wrote: Ok, I am not a PMC member nor committer so ignore/listen as you like. That makes no difference. You are a community member and we each listen to each other. By the way, when it comes time to vote on this topic, then please do: http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html#decision

Re: Proposal for Forrest-Cocoon-Lenya commit access

2005-09-02 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi: Thanks to David for the overview. IMO we should modularize this whole discusion in different topics. The lenght of the thread scream for SoC. :-) Thank to Thorsten that kindly shared with the rest of us (that are not participating on lenya-dev) the discussion about this topic in the

Re: updating the public forrest web site

2005-09-02 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: /etc/publishing_our_site.txt That uses the forrestbot to do it. I have been seeing a problem recently whereby it only commits new files, not changed ones, unless i remove the build directory and get forrestbot to start afresh. So i have resorted to the manual method,