Graham,
You placed the fix in a better spot than I did. I had placed it after the
apr_pool_userdata stuff due to not understanding what that was all about.
It makes better sense to simply test and exit the python_init() routine as
quickly as possible in the Win32 parent process. Your
Graham,
Your version works well.
Thanks,
Jeff
P.S.
I know you're not testing on windows, but I found another leak in
mpm_winnt.c. I'm reporting it on jira. Am I the only guy using apache on
windows???
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Graham
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz.asc
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz.md5
Christian V. wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:24:05 +0100 Christian V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ,
i 'm running a third-party web service authentication module that
hangs when the request coming from the client is splitted out in
different chunks. I don't have access to the
On 07/11/2006, at 10:51 PM, Jeff Robbins wrote:
Graham,
The problem on Win32 is that (I believe) we never want to
initialize Python in the persistent parent process. All the web
action is in the child process which is long-lived and it is this
child process that maintains the thread
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
Yes - we need to, +1, and I'd offered to RM APR... we've been whittling
down the apr bug list (primarily platform-by-platform quirks.) I can have
APR
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial
for AJP to work. Without that the loadbalancer is
unusable for most
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial
for AJP to work. Without that the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
that alternate method would, I think, be better
implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Sure it can be done, but in that case it would require at
least a minor version bump.
I have a proto that uses
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...
On Nov 8, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I'll put your tarball code up on ajax and people if Joe doesn't beat
me to it.
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
that alternate method would, I think, be better
implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Sure it can be done, but in that case it would require at
least a minor version bump.
I have a
In any case, I don't see a backport in STATUS so it's
all academic anyway ;)
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:34:27 -0500
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
Fairy nuff. I have some significant updates I'd like to add
(stop mod_dbd generating bogus errors when
while we are on the subject to of apr...May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.JorgeOn 11/8/06,
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should start
I'd be willing to test the tarballs on win x64 (32-bit and 64-bit) and on vista (32-bit).
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, mod_jk works on all the platforms with the
exact code like a charm ;)
With my non-devil's-advocate hat on, the code itself is
pretty basic Steven's anyway...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|]
Brian has expressed interest in brining mod_wombat to the ASF.
Is there interest in this PMC to bring it in under us?
The overview of mod_wombat:
mod_wombat ( https://svn.i-want-a-pony.com/repos/wombat/trunk/ ) was
written primarily by Brian McCallister with random bits of help from
Garrett
On 11/8/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts?
Big +1 from me, although you probably saw that coming ;-)
Seriously though, I want to see mod_lua here at the ASF eventually. I
had originally thought of it as a good example of a labs type project
(assuming that labs.apache.org
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:16:33 -0800
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian has expressed interest in brining mod_wombat to the ASF.
Is there interest in this PMC to bring it in under us?
Just to be clear about it: presumably you're proposing it have
a similar kind of status to mod_perl
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, mod_jk works on all the platforms with the
exact code like a charm ;)
With my non-devil's-advocate hat on, the code itself is
pretty basic Steven's anyway...
It might be, not sure, but as Ferengi Rule 31 states:
Never make fun of a Ferengi's
Hi.
I would like to know if ap_pass_brigade is and will remain synchronous
on all mpms. Can I assume that all memory used by the passed buckets can
be freed after calling ap_pass_brigade?
Thx,
Joachim
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Just to be clear about it: presumably you're proposing it have
a similar kind of status to mod_perl or mod_python?
Yes.
-Brian
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:16:33 -0800
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian has expressed interest in brining mod_wombat to the ASF.
Is there interest in this PMC to bring it in under us?
Just to be clear about it: presumably you're proposing it have
a similar kind of
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Seriously though, I want to see mod_lua here at the ASF eventually.
I agree ;-)
I had originally thought of it as a good example of a labs type
project
(assuming that labs.apache.org gets off the ground), but it certainly
has the
On 11/8/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I had thought it would be a good labs project, but as there is
already outside interest, I think a lab wouldn't be the right path
for it.
I figured as much. If there are people who aren't yet ASF committers
of some sort who are
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
is_socket_connected.
Scroll back a half hour :)
Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday
midday?
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of
On 11/08/2006 07:31 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
Just to be clear about it: presumably you're proposing it have
a similar kind of status to mod_perl or mod_python?
Yes.
+1 for this if it is a subproject like mod_perl or mod_python. It may
On 11/08/2006 07:16 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I am personally interested in it because I believe it could be one of
the paths taken for an httpd 3.0 in which Lua was embedded, replacing
the config system and other large areas of C code.
What is bad about the C code?
Regards
Rüdiger
Could someone please add version 2.0.59 to bugzilla for the product Apache
httpd-2?
Thanks and regards
Rüdiger
On 11/08/2006 08:18 AM, Benjamin Cuthbert wrote:
This happens when i have one connection to the tomcat jboss server.
Sorry for a possible confusion I might create. As the patch Mladen talks about
was backported today you can checkout the latest 2.2.x branch via
svn export
On 11/08/2006 07:30 PM, Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
I would like to know if ap_pass_brigade is and will remain synchronous
on all mpms. Can I assume that all memory used by the passed buckets can
be freed after calling ap_pass_brigade?
I cannot predict the future for major releases, but for
On 11/08/2006 10:28 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/08/2006 08:18 AM, Benjamin Cuthbert wrote:
This happens when i have one connection to the tomcat jboss server.
Sorry for a possible confusion I might create. As the patch Mladen talks about
was backported today you can checkout the
On Nov 8, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Could someone please add version 2.0.59 to bugzilla for the product
Apache httpd-2?
Done.
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description:
Allow mechanism used by global mutex locks to be specified.
---
Key: MODPYTHON-202
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-202
Project: mod_python
Issue Type: New Feature
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:19:28 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone please add version 2.0.59 to bugzilla for the product
Apache httpd-2?
Good point. That keeps happening. 'Twould be a Good Thing if
updating bugzilla were integrated into the release process.
--
Nick
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-09-13 15:45:30 -0400 (Wed, 13 Sep 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-195?page=all ]
Work on MODPYTHON-195 started by Graham Dumpleton.
Possible leaking of Win32 event handles when Apache restarted.
--
Key: MODPYTHON-195
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-195?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton resolved MODPYTHON-195.
Resolution: Fixed
Haven't been able to validate this first hand, but have accepted the following
change in python_init() to stop Win32
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.29-rc2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Changes since
Hi All,
Deepest apologies.
The correct version is 1.29-RC2 not 1.27-RC2 which I mistyped in the
subject and part of the E-Mail text. The URL and tarball were/are
correct as they stand.
Again, apologies especially for the SPAM.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for
44 matches
Mail list logo
