On 11/26/2014 12:43 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
As I mentioned a few months ago, ApacheCon Austin will be the 20th
anniversary of the first release of the Apache HTTP server. The plan is
to make a big deal of this at the conference, and I'm hoping that we can
have a strong httpd track to go along
to be improved in the doc?
Some howto kinds of docs on setting up various important things (php,
python) to run under the various flavors of fcgi would be awesome. It's
all a bit word of mouth at the moment.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
actually start submitting the talk abstracts to go along
with it. It would be great if this didn't get left to the last minute,
so that we can actually start doing some track publicity sooner rather
than later.
Thanks for the great discussion, folks!
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
be put into a half-day three-talk series, where each
talk stands alone or works in concert, that would be ideal. Do you think
that we can put together like that? Any chance we could even persuade
one of the OpenSSL folks to come for that? Anyone have any contacts there?
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo
like it would be welcome.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
. I can't imagine that
specific instance of the data is serving any purpose
Sorry about that. Not sure what I did there. :(
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
On Nov 29, 2014 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to submit something like This ain't your Daddy's Apache!...
Does that replace one of the ones already listed or is that a new item?
On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
I've started an
that should be giving those talks.
Thanks for any help you can give towards this.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
in Budapest!
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
On 06/17/2014 05:19 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 06/17/2014 12:46 AM, Tim Bannister wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:23, Rich Bowen wrote:
In addition, I have some comments about your design proposal:
- The apache.org design might be changing RSN (it's being discussed),
so using it might
to have a full track of httpd content, with more than just
the same old faces as every year. And if you're a first-time speaker,
and you want someone to give a proposal a first look, I would be
delighted to do that for you.
Thanks!
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
This seems like a cool idea. While I have no use for the functionality
myself I encounter people on irc every day that could benefit from
something like this to simplify complex rewrite sets.
--
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On May 5, 2014 4:14 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me
the space to fill the space.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
' talk?
Something on writing modules? Anything?
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
know we have a tendency to submit everything at the last minute, so
please don't forget that the last minute occurs at the end of next week.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://rcbowen.com/
mention this because some of you remember the days when a certain
speaker would do 5 or 6 talks every ApacheCon, and he's going to be kind
of busy this year, and so *isn't* going to submit all of those talks.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://rcbowen.com/
to resolve it, so I've
started with webmaster@. If anyone else is having a similar problem
registering, I'd love to hear (off-list) that I'm not so special.)
I've passed this on to Craig who runs the site. Hopefully he'll take
care of it promptly.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http
, and httpd is just one of them. All project have equal
footing within the Foundation, and such a thing, affecting the entire
Foundation, could not be decided here.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
in the
navigation bar on the left side.
I don't see this as a big issue that needs a vote, so I'll let it simmer
for a while (standard 72 hours) and assume lazy consensus if I hear no
objections from you lot.
With regards,
Daniel.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
interpolate me, man! could be handy too.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
+1
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[ ] +1: I support this proposal
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
that are already provided, but will do so this week and work on integrating it
into the rest of the docs where it is relevant. I expect that the vhost section
is an obvious entry point, as that's where I see mod_macro used most
extensively in the wild.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
and responsibility for its
maintenance
[ +/- 0] don't care won't help
[ -1] don't accept mod_macro as a standard module
+1
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
make me very happy. It's one of the modules that I often in my
talks encourage people to install immediately and think of as a standard
module. It would be awesome if it really was.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
On Oct 12, 2012, at 5:38 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Typo Alarm:
Sorry. Fixing.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Shosholoza
[ x ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
consider them to be more of a means of contributing to the doc effort.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
On 2012 5 21 17:04, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
In light of recent concerns about the Disqus system, I've taken it upon
myself to figure out an alternative we can use for adding comments to
our pages. And so, through the better half of a day, I worked on
creating a new system that is
On May 8, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[ +1 ] to migrate httpd-site to the CMS
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
is a pretty big undertaking, but in the long run will
make the docs more what our audience needs and is asking for.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
the same comments as in /trunk/ ?
I would assume that if the test is successful we would expand it to current
and 2.2. As to whether each branch has their own comments, I think they
probably should, but thats still to be decided.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
not an enormous problem, and I'm sure that most folks don't even think it's a
problem. But it's something that I've been thinking about for a few years.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
it
very alienating, and this is a loss to all of us.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Being a new committer and, basically, just a documentation committer, I feel
that I must bring this before the dev@ list before proceeding any further.
There appears to be a mismatch between the mpm defaults in the configuration
and the
. Option 1, in experimental.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
. I figure the technical aspects will work
themselves out in trunk ... or they won't, and we'll drop it from a release
branch.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
a rel canonical tag,
it started pointing to the 2.2 mod_rewrite docs as the top hit.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
that. Apparently not. Doing it now.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
that, there are some changes that we need to make the pointers
in them to the current docs actually go the right place. Some of the pages
reference 2.2 as the current version, and also /current/ still points to 2.2.
So, give us a moment to resolve those two issues …
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
messages to mod_foo might be fine for now, but in httpd version
4.8 we may have all new messages. Not sure we can adequately determine how many
is enough to allocate.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
the format string is
split into several parts (e.g. over several lines), where the loglevel
is not constant but a variable, and possibly some others.
Are other folks comfortable with going this way? Add it to 2.4?
+1
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
) the wisdom of this and 2) the method of assigning codes?
I've long considered error messages to be documentation and would live to see
the log files be one step more helpful.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:49, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 27.11.2011 10:50, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
docs/icons/apache_pb2* contain the version number (2.2), in the case
of docs/icons/apache_pb2_ani.gif it's even an animation.
Any volunteers for changing these to 2.4?
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:14, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:58, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion of the odd format. That seems very reasonable.
Clearly I need to stop writing email on my phone. The CODE format.
it bundled makes everything that much easier.
Having it a separate module makes it no more convenient than it already is as a
third-party thing.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
- mod_lbmethod_bybusyness
- mod_lbmethod_byrequests
- mod_lbmethod_bytraffic
Do we really need full doccos for these sub modules?
No matter what, these would be easy to do
On Sep 18, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones
, RSRC_CONF,
- the filename of the cookie log),
AP_INIT_FLAG(BufferedLogs, set_buffered_logs_on, NULL, RSRC_CONF,
Enable Buffered Logging (experimental)),
{NULL}
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
missed, or which are new since I made the original list.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
long, but we lose nothing by setting it there rather than too
short.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
can be of assistance.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
on this for me.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
In the documentation for the ErrorLogFormat directive, log format strings are
given as, for example, %...A
What does the ... signify?
It's not clear to me either from the doc (which doesn't mention it) or the
source what that's supposed
0 means unlimited - this is consistent across all of our configuration
directives. Please let's not change that here. It's what folks expect it to
mean. Let's not surprise them.
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:09, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Jim Jagielski
On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:41, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
e.g. MaxRanges none | 0 (none) | unlimited | n=1
0 means unlimited - this is consistent across all of our configuration
directives. Please let's not change
. Seems like a great improvement.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
);'
(06-29 10:42)
5.22%
Doesn't seem like it's a terribly significant addition.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
[rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
(06-29 10:39)
249M ./
Oops. 'make distclean' dropped about 40M off of that. But, still, I think
I find 98M in a clean checkout. (69M of that belong to the docs already).
Wow. I had no idea the docs were that much of it.
maybe we should move out the docs entirely
-1
Putting any extra obstacles in front of anyone writing a doc is unwise.
I don't honestly think anyone minds
On May 2, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I took a pass at the doc to make the stuff we're discussing a bit more
explicit which might help the discussion/deprecation too.
http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/rewrite-substitution_clarity.diff
+1 to changes.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo
tr
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
rbo...@apache.org
like for us
to be more proactive about strengthening the community bond between us and what
is probably the most important third-party Apache httpd module. There seems to
be a pretty strong they don't ever listen to us attitude on both sides, and
I'm not sure that it's really warranted.
--
Rich
is required to make it smoother.)
That sounds good, I suppose, but doesn't actually help any of our actual
customers today, or any foreseeable tomorrow.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
an alternative seems discourteous both to these
Windows users and to the PHP community.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting
?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
i got home, and promptly
forgot.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
by
making the configuration smarter.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
M /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/index.xml
Use the developer docs on ASF hardware, instead of rcbowen.com
Thanks, Gav.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
That's not right. Either use Files or Filesmatch. If you want to use
Files .ht* then you need to /Files. You want to fix this, or
should I get it?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
://modules.apache.org/reference.php
which is hosted elsewhere. That (modules.apache.org in general) has
come up again and again, but nobody really has the time/passion to do
much about it.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
told me
that's *pre* 1.3...
Yep. Shambhala is what became 1.0
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
there - there's too many things
that have to be set - but hypothetically, that should be what we're
working towards when we make changes like this.
So, +1 to changing this, as it give us something that is safe to have
set server-wide.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
-vhost basis? I don't understand
the distinction, other than we've never done it that way.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: SetVirtualDocumentRoot
I was reading bug reports this morning, and wondered if
someone could
take a look at the patch offered here:
https
the LoadModule directive to load
mod_include.
Swet. +1
Better error messages are always a plus.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
();
}
}
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Thanks.
I've applied the patch, based on the approval received so far.
I like error messages that are informative and tell you how to fix the
problem.
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like to make the following change
Um. Sorry guys. I just assigned the open docs bugs to the
d...@httpd.a.o account, and triggered that flood of bugzilla messages.
I'm very sorry. You can scold me at ApacheCon on Monday.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://drbacchus.com/
going to
try to take care of during the week, too. These will be (assuming I
get to it soon) listed in the STATUS file under the docs dir, although
certainly any docs improvements are welcome.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://drbacchus.com/
creating a new iconset, not
basing it
on something else.
That would be awesome. Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://drbacchus.com/
as though
everyone considered the 1.3 - 2.x jump a major step, but the 2.0 -
2.2 jump pretty minor. I hardly ever encounter 2.0 users
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
http://drbacchus.com/
Uppercase!!
Oy. Ok, fixed. :)
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
really be a solution.
For the most part, folks who need to use .htaccess files are not in a
position to really do much in the way of performance tuning, and vice
versa.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
comparison.
On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Was that benchmarking in 1.3 time? I have had the experience that the
parsing of .htaccess is *a lot* more heavy-weight in 2.x than it used
to be in 1.3.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
The testing I did was on a site with no .htaccess files. I did:
Directory /
AllowOverride All
/Directory
And, yes, I acknowledge that this is a stupid thing to do, and
specifically discouraged in the documentation. It was to prove
On Sep 25, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 26 September 2010, Rich Bowen wrote:
Another question on this thread - is ScriptLog also going away?
It hasn't been on my radar so far. Should it?
pros:
- per dir config instead of per vhost
- possibly finer control
Another question on this thread - is ScriptLog also going away?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
is going
to increase troubleshooting complexity, and I suspect that folks are
going to be rather annoyed at the loss of the RewriteLog directive
without something comparable to replace it.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
:' rewrite_log
Do you really think that we need this in httpd itself?
Hmm. You're probably right. This is probably something to fix in
documentation rather than adding the extra complexity. :)
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
in driving migration to more modern
versions.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
, and why?
Or is that not actually how it happened?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
option
:-)
You can see it live at http://www.javierllorente.com/tmp/
+1
Am I correct in understanding that you're donating these to the Apache
HTTP Server project, or that they're under a license that permits us
to redistribute them?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
of
the LGPL, I
could change the license of my collection to make it compatible;
If it's your work, you're welcome to relicense it under whatever
license you like, including ASL2.
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
these details with your developer lists, and with any
individuals who you know to be good trainers in your particular topic.
Please let me know any questions you have.
--
Rich Bowen, for the ApacheCon Conference Committee
rbo...@apache.org
On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:48 AM, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rbowen
Date: Tue Mar 16 12:48:31 2010
New Revision: 923712
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923712view=rev
Log:
In as much as we can be said to have consensus on anything
On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Andrew Ford wrote:
I have signed up for the Apache Retreat in Wicklow (and my employer
is providing me with time off!). I had said that I would work on
the Apache HTTPD documentation once I had finished writing The
Apache2 Pocket Reference, but work and real
101 - 200 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
