On 12/06/2014 01:40 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com
mailto:jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2014 02:08 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2014 02:08 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com
On 12/02/2014 02:08 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com
mailto:jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not
On 09/15/2014 08:00 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
Hi,
I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with
the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
Hi,
I think mod_systemd could be proposed for
Whether we like it or not, systemd is here to stay.
systemd: The Emacs of Linux init implementations.
*grin*
On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius
On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
Hi,
I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with
the changes adding socket activation), but for
Hello,
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default
(CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them
are going to use systemd by
Am 14.09.2014 um 13:21 schrieb Martynas Bendorius:
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in
trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default
(CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS,
openSUSE),
Reindl, thank you for your input :) mod_journald was just an addition to
this letter, because it's available on RHEL7/CentOS7 and many other
distros, the main thing in question in mod_systemd, which is really
useful, and distributions supporting systemd already provide mod_systemd
by default,
On 09/14/2014 01:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.09.2014 um 13:21 schrieb Martynas Bendorius:
Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available in
trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default (CentOS/RHEL
7,
12 matches
Mail list logo
