[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
New Revision: 159356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=159356
Log:
sync with 2.0.54-dev
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
URL:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:45 -0800, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
New Revision: 159356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=159356
Log:
sync with 2.0.54-dev
Modified:
Hi,
I developed a library which is called by PHP. The
library has a global data cache which is accessed and
updated by the functions in the library. The cache of
the library apparently couldn't be shared among
multiprocesses. But it seemed to me that apache can't
run as a single process
If there's no objection, shall I just go ahead and commit this?
-aaron
On Mar 24, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I've attached a patch against the trunk of Apache 1.3 that backports
support for the AllowEncodedSlashes directive. It should behave
identically to the way it works in 2.0. By
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Aaron Bannert wrote:
If there's no objection, shall I just go ahead and commit this?
-aaron
On Mar 24, 2005, at 4:38 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I've attached a patch against the trunk of Apache 1.3
The STATUS file says:
2.1.4 : in development
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
The ap_release.h header file says:
2.1.5-dev
The distribution page /dist/httpd says:
httpd-2.1.3-beta.tar.gz
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
-
Open an enhancement request in Bugzilla
http://httpd.apache.org/bug_report.html an include the patch file there.
Brad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:47:52 AM
Hello,
for my personal needs i had to add some functionality to mod_charset_lite.
Here is what i did:
1) Add an
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
As it turns out, we clone all of the main request's input headers when
we create the subrequest, including C-L. Whacking the subrequest's
C-L header fixes the hang. Since the main request's body could also
have be chunked, we should probably remove the
Paul Querna wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
The problem is that the subrequest is inheriting entity-header fields
from the mainline request (mainline request was a POST). This patch
should be generalised to remove all inherited entity-header fields
from the subrequest.
Something that popped into
--On Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:22 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
OtherBill has consistently repeated that he will -1 anything entering beta.
So, until he resolves his issues, we're at a standstill.
My current
Brad Nicholes wrote:
The STATUS file says:
2.1.4 : in development
I was tagged as alpha. It sort of died, because of problems in
apr-iconv. The Status file should be updated.
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
It had enough votes for beta, but I am not sure on the RM's
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
It had enough votes for beta, but I am not sure on the RM's decision.
It isn't the RM's decision. A majority vote of the PMC is a decision
to release provided there are at least three +1s. The RM is just the
person doing the heavy lifting.
Roy
At 10:47 AM 3/29/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Since the bit breaks binary compatibility, I'll toss my -1 into
the ring. It's non-technical though, so not a veto.
I wish we had pool datum, which would
At 12:40 PM 3/29/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:22 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
OtherBill has consistently repeated that he will -1 anything entering beta.
So, until he resolves
'Apache' was our program. It became our project. It's become
our entire organization.
In 2.2, I -will- be changing the default location for the Win32
installer from %programsdir%\Apache Group\Apache2\ over to
%programsdir%\Apache Software Foundation\Apache HTTP Server 2.2\.
This is consistent
+1, I agree with using Lazy Consensus(CTR) for non-API changes in a
2.2.x branch, until it reaches GA.
-Paul
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Assuming that we can get a beta approved to eventually become 2.2.x, I'd
like to propose the following policy that tries to balance the need for
review with the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So can I have a quick vote before beta to rename our program to
'httpd.exe' on Windows, matching our Unix builds?
Makes Sense, +1.
-Paul
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
'Apache' was our program. It became our project. It's become
our entire organization.
In 2.2, I -will- be changing the default location for the Win32
installer from %programsdir%\Apache Group\Apache2\ over to
%programsdir%\Apache Software Foundation\Apache HTTP Server
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:47 AM 3/29/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Since the bit breaks binary compatibility, I'll toss my -1 into
the ring. It's non-technical though, so not a veto.
I wish
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
to remove his -1. Every time I have tried to remove his stated
arguments against going beta (I lost count at 4 different rationales
against beta), OtherBill suddenly presents more arguments as to why
httpd can't enter beta.
Justin, your
So can I have a quick vote before beta to rename our program to
'httpd.exe' on Windows, matching our Unix builds?
That's change at a confuse-the-lusers level. I can just see the
flood of where's apache.exe? questions on users@ and other fora.
--
Nick Kew
Hello,
for my personal needs i had to add some functionality to mod_charset_lite.
Here is what i did:
1) Add an option AllowProxied that makes it work also on proxied requests
(usefull in a reverse proxy environment which uses mod_proxy_html to return
to the original encoding).
2)
At 05:08 PM 3/29/2005, Roy T.Fielding wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
Bill, why don't you just fix whatever it is that you think of as
broken rather than send negative votes?
The last release simply came to quickly between announce of the
intent and the tarball.
At 04:56 PM 3/29/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:47 AM 3/29/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Since the bit breaks binary compatibility, I'll toss my -1 into
the ring. It's
At 04:40 PM 3/29/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
As the unix binary is 'httpd', it seems time to change the Win32
binary to 'httpd.exe'. It just seems to be a bit archaic to
continue to use 'Apache.exe' when you look at www.apache.org and
consider what the foundation's become.
So can I have a quick
On Mar 29, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Since we're extending core_dir_config, we should document the
change in core_dir_config
Should I elaborate more in my core_dir_config from what I already have?
Index: src/include/http_core.h
26 matches
Mail list logo
