On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the particular box only Apache is running no other application process is
running.Also one more observation was when the Apache is stopped the free -m
doesn't result to the original memory restore.We have to reboot
It sounds like you're tracking the wrong numbers if memory isn't free
when the application terminates.
Not clear to me.Can you please add some more lights to it.
Thanks
A
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Arnab Ganguly
On Wed 26 Mar 2008, Akins, Brian wrote:
There seems to be a demand for dynamic per-request configuration,
as evidenced by the number of users hacking it with mod_rewrite,
and the other very limited tools available. Modern mod_rewrite
usage commonly looks like programming, but it's not
I used to use mod_macro, then I moved to mod_perl but like you said.
mod_perl is great (well, more okay than great) for dynamic configurations
that change/get generated on start and not per request.
A new more flexible alternative would be awsome.
Jorge (on vacation)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:17:01 -0400
Akins, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/08 3:58 AM, Torsten Foertsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So I was going to reimplement it based on mod_wombat some
time this year.
The nice thing about lua, in addition to being lightweight, is that
most
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:15:02 +0100
Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ap_hook_monitor?
As I understand the monitor hook, httpd itself also uses it. Thus
letting modules do maintenance stuff in the same hook could easily
break the timing of the httpd internal tasks.
There's nothing
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:15:02 +0100
Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ap_hook_monitor?
As I understand the monitor hook, httpd itself also uses it. Thus
letting modules do maintenance stuff in the same hook could easily
break the timing of the httpd internal tasks.
On 3/27/08 9:00 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/Lua
Fine for users who want to hack their own server. Like Perl.
Every play with lighttpd? It's almost the same way... Of course typical
lighthttpd user is a hacker.
But r.filename is the kind of innards we really don't want
to
-- sorry in the case of duplicate messages --
Hi,
I notice that in mod_proxy_balancer the workers' lbfactors is
dynamically updated without any critical section lock between the
call. That is, simply:
wsel-s-lbfactor = ival;
Quick question: If I am planning to change the lbfactors in my
On 03/27/2008 06:20 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
-- sorry in the case of duplicate messages --
Hi,
I notice that in mod_proxy_balancer the workers' lbfactors is
dynamically updated without any critical section lock between the
call. That is, simply:
wsel-s-lbfactor = ival;
IMHO this
10 matches
Mail list logo
