From the Apache HTTP Server project;
On the combined topics of mod_firehose, mod_policy and mod_combine;
Declaring the vote on #3 failed (both originally, and the revote). RE-VOTE
#1 and #2 for firehose and policy modules (respectively) each have passed, for
adoption into httpd trunk.
On 28 Mar 2012, at 1:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Cut out the drama. It is not helpful here.
The simple question is whether or not Graham has met the conditions specified
in section 3 and 4 of the ICLA:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Answer that in the affirmative, and you are
Hi Michael,
Am 27.03.2012 09:07, schrieb Michael Felt:
since my packaging scripts are not part of apr or apr-util I believe the
following change is warrented:
--- httpd-2.4.x/build/aix/buildaix.ksh (revision 1305578)
+++ httpd-2.4.x/build/aix/buildaix.ksh (working copy)
@@ -62,14 +62,12 @@
Being a new committer and, basically, just a documentation committer, I
feel that I must bring this before the dev@ list before proceeding any
further. There appears to be a mismatch between the mpm defaults in the
configuration and the documentation surrounding it as well as the header
Mobile mail.. sorry for brevity...
Doesn't the ICLA Graham has previously filed with the ASF already compel him to
make no contribution unless those conditions are met?
After a decade is there any reason to believe he would act in contradiction to
his sworn ICLA?
Sorry if you find this
Guys. You were asked a boolean question. I'm pretty sure it was
intended to be taken literally. Have you considered just answering it?
