Hi!
I am writing my own module that handles all incoming requests. In some cases, I
want this request to be handled by mod_python which I installed. In these
cases, my module should change the requested file extension to .py, which is
configured to be handled by mod_python.
AddHandler
On 2012-08-22 09:31, Adi Selitzky wrote:
Hi!
I am writing my own module that handles all incoming requests. In some cases, I
want this request to be handled by mod_python which I installed. In these
cases, my module should change the requested file extension to .py, which is
configured to be
On 21 Aug 2012, at 20:27, Mikhail T. wrote:
From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only
use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single
DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example.
That is by design: it is expected to meet most
On 22 Aug 2012, at 10:25 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only
use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single
DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example.
That is by design: it is expected to meet most
Hi dev@,
I've been wondering (and tinkering with) the idea of creating output
filters through mod_lua. If this has already been discussed, it was
before my time here, so please forgive any redundant ideas.
Essentially, what I'd like to do is be able to do the following:
LuaOutputFilter
On 22 Aug 2012, at 11:43, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 22 Aug 2012, at 10:25 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
From reading the module's documentation, it seems, a single vhost can only
use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single
DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example.
On 22 Aug 2012, at 12:00, Daniel Gruno wrote:
So, any feedback, comments, thoughts on this?
Basic concept looks fine. I guess we'd need more detail
to say any more about it.
Is the implementation 'clean' or does it involve hacks to core?
If what you have is pure module then I'd see no reason
All looks fine on Windows.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:25 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
Candidate binaries are available from
On 22.08.2012 07:24, Nick Kew wrote:
The implementation needs object persistence, of the kind we have
in the per-server configuration but not per-directory. That was the
original design constraint.
I'd say, my complaint was a little misunderstood. It is not, that I wish
to see separate
On 08/21/2012 06:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
NOTE to Windows users: The issues with AcceptFilter None replacing
Win32DisableAcceptEx appears to have resolved starting with version
2.4.3 make Apache httpd 2.4.x suitable for Windows servers.
I noticed the following blurb from
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:21:16 -0400
Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 22.08.2012 07:24, Nick Kew wrote:
The implementation needs object persistence, of the kind we have
in the per-server configuration but not per-directory. That was the
original design constraint.
I'd say, my
Perhaps, this discussion should be happening on theticket
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53666 itself? Oh, well :)
Comments inline:
On 22.08.2012 10:47, Nick Kew wrote:
I think I've pointed a few people at the ODBC driver as an alternative.
Do you have a strong reason to
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
Perhaps, this discussion should be happening on the ticket itself? Oh, well
:) Comments inline:
and/or d...@apr.apache.org
On 22.08.2012 10:47, Nick Kew wrote:
I think I've pointed a few people at the ODBC driver
On 22.08.2012 12:55, Jeff Trawick wrote:
and/or...@apr.apache.org
You are right. Unfortunately, that list (like this one), requires one to
subscribe before posting. I deeply resent such requirements and try to avoid
such lists, when at all possible :-(
Yours,
-mi
On 08/22/2012 01:36 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Basic concept looks fine. I guess we'd need more detail
to say any more about it.
Is the implementation 'clean' or does it involve hacks to core?
If what you have is pure module then I'd see no reason
not to drop mod_lua_filter (or is it
On 22 Aug 2012, at 22:25, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
Would your concept meaningfully generalise beyond application-level filters?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this, could you elaborate?
If you want some more sophisticated examples of what could be achieved with
Lua
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
17 matches
Mail list logo
