Re: Accessing environment variables set by other modules

2012-10-02 Thread Christoph Gröver
Hello Jeff, Sometimes envvars are set directly into subprocess_env (e.g., handling of SetEnv/SetEnvIf). IOW, subprocess_env is the primary representation. But the REMOTE_USER and HTTP request header variables are a representation of information stored elsewhere (r-user, r-headers_in),

Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Jan Kaluža
Hi, I'm not sure who has done original ./docs/icons/apache_pb2.* icons, but I think they should be updated to show 2.4 version for httpd-2.4. We are using that icon in default index.html in Fedora and it would be really nice to see version 2.4 there instead of 2.2. I can probably try to fix

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/02/2012 01:01 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: Hi, I'm not sure who has done original ./docs/icons/apache_pb2.* icons, but I think they should be updated to show 2.4 version for httpd-2.4. We are using that icon in default index.html in Fedora and it would be really nice to see version 2.4 there

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 10/02/2012 01:41 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 10/02/2012 01:01 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: Hi, I'm not sure who has done original ./docs/icons/apache_pb2.* icons, but I think they should be updated to show 2.4 version for httpd-2.4. We are using that icon in default index.html in Fedora and it

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Gregg Smith
On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing. If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg version. Or if the original author still has the original

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/02/2012 01:56 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/2/2012 4:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Yes, this does seem to be something that needs fixing. If people are content with this suggestion, I can turn it into png/gif images and put them in the docs folder in trunk as well as the svg version. Or if

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Gregg Smith
On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Righto, ASL getting in the way ;) I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff: Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL Apache is done with Syncopate, which is also using ASL. Take a look and see if the

Re: Powered by icon for httpd-2.4 needs update

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/02/2012 03:42 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/2/2012 5:41 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Righto, ASL getting in the way ;) I have updated my suggestion for a powered-by logo using only ASL stuff: Powered by and 2.4 is done with Droid Sans, which is using ASL Apache is done with Syncopate, which

Re: 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file. There are a handful of showstoppers that I'm thinking about deferring and pushing ahead with the 2.0.65 release. On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I can't recall either, but doing so in conjunction with the

Re: 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file. There are a handful of showstoppers that I'm thinking about deferring and pushing ahead with the 2.0.65 release. I'll try to find a little time. My 2 cents (which I

Re: 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file. There are a handful of showstoppers that I'm thinking about deferring and pushing ahead with the

Re: 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file. There are a handful of showstoppers that I'm thinking about deferring and pushing ahead with the