On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:56 PM, André Malo wrote:
> * wr...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Tue Apr 18 16:25:03 2017
>> New Revision: 1791807
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791807=rev
>> Log:
>> KISS: RemoveType is a simpler fix for .tr
>
> I seem to
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:56 PM, André Malo wrote:
> * wr...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Tue Apr 18 16:25:03 2017
>> New Revision: 1791807
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791807=rev
>> Log:
>> KISS: RemoveType is a simpler fix for .tr
>
> I seem to
* wr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Apr 18 16:25:03 2017
> New Revision: 1791807
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791807=rev
> Log:
> KISS: RemoveType is a simpler fix for .tr
I seem to remember, that removetype does not override mime.types (only
addtype entries).
Evaluating whether I will attend ApacheCon, the most specific reason would
be hackathon time. Or productive BoF sessions.
Who all is planning to spend some time hacking at ACNA '17? Ideas for
projects or BoF topics?
Now also build with Openssl 1.1.0e.
Running now on Apachelounge.
Build with:
---
httpd 2.4.26-dev
nghttp2 1.21.1
apr 1.6.1-dev with IPv6 enabled
apr-util 1.6.1-dev with Crypto OpenSSL enabled
apr-iconv 1.2.1
openssl 1.1.0e
zlib 1.2.11
pcre 8.40 with JIT, SUPPORT_UTF8 and
Here we go: https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases/tag/v1.10.2
> Am 18.04.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> In transit. Just some minutes away...
>
>> Am 18.04.2017 um 15:06 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>> :
>>
>>
>> Am
In transit. Just some minutes away...
> Am 18.04.2017 um 15:06 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> :
>
>
> Am 18.04.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> that is a 1.10.0, right? That was the first version without nested locking
>> and I fixed 2
Am 18.04.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
> Stefan,
>
> that is a 1.10.0, right? That was the first version without nested locking
> and I fixed 2 possible dead locks in 1.10.1.
>
> I am about to release a 1.10.2 with added conformity checks and a fix for
> client omitting EOF flags.
Stefan,
that is a 1.10.0, right? That was the first version without nested locking and
I fixed 2 possible dead locks in 1.10.1.
I am about to release a 1.10.2 with added conformity checks and a fix for
client omitting EOF flags. Could you give that one a try?
-Stefan
> Am 18.04.2017 um
Hi,
i saw that all of them are still serving one h2 connection.
server-status:
0-3 32375 42/64/181 G 30.09 1020776 214 1285.1 2.40
5.81
h081217236127.dyn.cm.kabsi.at h2 :443GET
/wp-content/uploads/Bloglr21-8003asd.jpg HTTP/2.0
And they all
What Eric said.
With the changes in http2 worker scheduling, if I introduced a bug
in child exit there, I'd expect it to trigger via workers_pool_cleanup()
in h2_workers.c
-Stefan
> Am 18.04.2017 um 14:47 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Stefan
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
> bt of such a process shows:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7f5df74f64db in pthread_join () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
Need to see the other threads in the process, this one is just waiting
for
Hi,
not sure whether this is related to mod_http2 v1.10.0 or is something else.
I've seen two servers where old httpd processes get stuck.
server-status looks like this:
SlotPID StoppingConnections Threads Async connections
total accepting busyidlewriting
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Why would it be good for a stable (i.e. non-experimental)
> component of httpd to have an entirely different commit
> policy to the project as a whole? Surely the CTR is in
> recognition of its experimental status, to lubricate
On 17 Apr 2017, at 10:24 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> These modules, they grow up so fast...
>
> For the project, it would be good to drop that "experimental" and
> treat HTTP/2 as an integral part of httpd. Not only for political
> posturing (which is important),
On 15 Apr 2017, at 11:02 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi everyone, shall we drop experimental from mod_http2 for 2.4.next?
+1.
> We could drop it and keep CTR.
It can’t be not-experimental and CRT at the same time.
Regards,
Graham
—
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On 04/16/2017 02:15 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-04-15 at 17:02 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Hi everyone, shall we drop experimental from mod_http2 for 2.4.next?
>>
>> We could drop it and keep CTR.
>>
> Why would it be good for a stable (i.e. non-experimental)
> component of httpd to
17 matches
Mail list logo