Hi Jim,
On 08.02.2012 17:01, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Wed Feb 8 16:01:34 2012
New Revision: 1241953
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241953view=rev
Log:
remove -deps info from INSTALL
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/INSTALL
Modified:
On 19.07.2012 23:31, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu Jul 19 21:31:52 2012
New Revision: 1363557
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363557view=rev
Log:
mpm_event, mpm_worker: Remain active amidst prevalent child process
resource shortages.
This is a somewhat different
On 22.07.2012 16:14, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Jul 22 13:48:30 2012
New Revision: 1364302
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364302view=rev
Log:
Add mergeinfo for backports done by jim in r1200981.
Is there a
On 22.07.2012 16:59, Eric Covener wrote:
CAUTION:
Always merge into a clean branch checkout and commit the whole branch. If
you start to only commit parts of the branch after merging, svn will produce
additional mergeinfo properties attached to sub directories or files. We
don't want that.
I
On 23.07.2012 17:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is this still useful: svnmerge.py ?
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Svnmerge.py
A quick check of
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/contrib/client-side/svnmerge/
and the mailing list activity suggests, that there isn't much going
On 23.07.2012 19:21, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:45:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I for sure don't use 'svn merge' and am likely guilty (and the
orig post clearly indicates) of this... For awhile, svn merge
was as wonky as hell, so I simply skipped using it and instead
used
On 24.07.2012 08:58, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton Sent: Montag, 23. Juli 2012 22:06
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: ProxyBlock question
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
b) if it's not the desired
On 24.07.2012 10:20, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:55:27AM +, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Thanks. The patch reminded me of a special situation where the patch
might not be suitable: If the forward proxy just forwards everything
to the next proxy e.g. because it cannot
On 24.07.2012 11:22, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:46:12AM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
IMHO if the admin explicitely configured an IP in the ProxyBlock
list we should nevertheless check. For this case there's already a
somewhat related warning in the docs which we could enhance
On 24.07.2012 19:23, Cantor, Scott wrote:
I'm seeing a build bug on a Solaris box with a very recent GCC version against
the Apache 2.4 headers, which I'm wondering about.
All my AP_INIT_TAKE1 macros for command handling are failing with:
error: expected primary-expression before '.' token
On 24.07.2012 19:40, Joe Orton wrote:
The test case for PR 45434 seems to have regressed across 2.2-2.4.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45434
I have not tried to understand the mechanics here, but a dumb
side-by-side analysis found a missing piece, below. 2.2 hardcodes
Hi Gregg,
On 03.08.2012 22:13, gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Fri Aug 3 20:13:38 2012
New Revision: 1369191
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1369191view=rev
Log:
r1364253 forces the build to find mod_ssl.h
This should be CTR, feel free to revert if you do
not like this way
On 06.08.2012 12:32, Daniel Gruno wrote:
I can't seem to find
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/ssl-support-uninstalled-openssl-2_4.patch
- did you forget to upload it? :)
Yes :(
Now there.
By the way: I updated
On 05.08.2012 10:10, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 08.07.2012 10:30, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 06.07.2012 14:41, b...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ben
Date: Fri Jul 6 12:41:10 2012
New Revision: 1358167
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1358167view=rev
Log:
Work correctly with a development version
On 11.08.2012 14:43, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 08/11/2012 02:37 PM, humbed...@apache.org wrote:
Author: humbedooh
Date: Sat Aug 11 12:37:15 2012
New Revision: 1371932
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371932view=rev
Log:
Comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One
of the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t member,
which at least on Sparc is 8 Bytes, whereas for 32 bit builds long is
only 4 Bytes.
Currently everything is aligned for 4 Bytes, so we get bus
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t member, which at
least on Sparc is 8
On 13.08.2012 19:40, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has
On 13.08.2012 21:02, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.08.2012 19:40, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040
On 15.08.2012 02:00, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Aug 15 00:00:42 2012
New Revision: 1373169
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373169view=rev
Log:
clarify :)
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL:
On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
I hope she is doing better now.
I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
Any conflicts??
You might want to take a look at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1241953
Since
On 14.08.2012 23:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
slotmem handles this well, afaict ;)
The fix applied in r1373270 which Joe also had a look at is very similar
to the handling in slotmem. I added some macros as proposed by Joe.
Fortunately the code in shmcb already did all the address calculations
On 17.08.2012 12:38, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 08/17/2012 12:34 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
Please change the svn:log revision property for this revision such
that your comment is documented in Subversion properly.
Because it's a FAQ ;)
On 17.08.2012 19:22, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This list is frankly too long to consider for a TR today, which will happen
later this afternoon or early evening as I mentioned several days ago.
Rainer, can you draw our attention to the backports most critical to closing
any security issues
Hi Roy,
On 18.08.2012 22:07, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I built 2.4.3 with the options
./configure \
--prefix=$tdir \
--with-apr=$adir \
--with-apr-util=$adir \
--without-ssl \
--without-crypto \
--disable-cache \
On 19.08.2012 00:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 18, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes, before 2.4.0 we introduced exactly this difference. All modules that were
build get a LoadModule line in the installed config, but most are commented
out. I don't have the list of modles active
On 17.08.2012 19:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.3 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.3 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 21.08.2012 16:22, PKU-bswen wrote:
The cited documentation seems to apply only to Windows Server 2003?
Unfortunately I can't easily check myself, but the documentation states
the automatic chosing of the debug variants also for VS 2012:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z8h19c37
Now that 2.4.3 is released and annouced I'm in the process of updating
the security page (the xml file with the known vulnerabilities) to
include the two issues that are in CHANGES.
The XSS mod_negotitation issues I think is clearly of severity level 4
(low), but I'm a bit uncertain about the
See subject.
Done.
On 21.08.2012 17:41, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:]
Sent: Dienstag, 21. August 2012 17:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Updating 2.4 security page
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Now that 2.4.3
On 23.08.2012 03:16, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and
On 23.08.2012 09:57, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Vote] httpd 2.2.23 release
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick
On 23.08.2012 13:29, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.08.2012 09:57, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 09:55
To: dev
On 21.08.2012 21:25, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
this evening.
Feedback and edits
On 23.08.2012 23:44, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Sorry, I'm not ignoring the list (entirely). Seems Thunderbird and my ISP
have decided not to dance anymore and it looks like I'm spending Thursday
doing some fundamental email restructuring (sigh). Hopefully I'll have the
list traffic back
Hi Bill,
On 23.08.2012 23:44, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Sorry, I'm not ignoring the list (entirely). Seems Thunderbird and my ISP
have decided not to dance anymore and it looks like I'm spending Thursday
doing some fundamental email restructuring (sigh). Hopefully I'll have the
list traffic
On 04.09.2012 16:09, Zisis Lianas wrote:
I noticed some different behaviour of SSLProxyCheckPeerCN in combination
with activated ProxyPreserveHost since httpd-2.4.3.
httpd-2.4.2 and httpd-2.2.22 seem to work 'correctly' (or vice versa).
When setting SSLProxyCheckPeerCN and ProxyPreserveHost to
On 31.08.2012 15:45, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm fighting a problem on new releases of AIX where in some
environments, /dev/random seems to run out of entropy way too quick.
I'd like a way to suppress the apr_uuid_get-
apr_generate_random_bytes() in mod_proxy_balancer used for the
balancer-manager
On 04.10.2012 05:15, Eric Covener wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png
http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png
pb3 has my vote
Same here and thanks for the effort.
Typo Alarm:
On 11.10.2012 00:35, rbo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rbowen
Date: Wed Oct 10 22:35:19 2012
New Revision: 1396838
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1396838view=rev
Log:
Adds example
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mpm_winnt.xml
Modified:
On 29.10.2012 16:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to release 2.4.4 in a few weeks (mid-Nov or so)...
Could people review STATUS (and vote) as well as add potential
backports?
Any chance www.apache.org will be updated from 2.4.1 to 2.4.3 before? It
would be good to check whether the long
On 11.11.2012 09:57, Fabien wrote:
Hello devs,
I have developed and maintained a small module called mod_macro since
1998. It is currently available at:
http://people.apache.org/~fabien/mod_macro/
I started it one day as was fed up with copy-pasting configuration
directives from one
Hi,
I updated the first ASF web server from 2.4.1 to 2.4.3. It is running
the service for mail-archives.apache.org in US, so you can reach it via
mail-archives.us.apache.org. It is being proxied by www.apache.org.
One strange thing: the /server-status directly tells us it has about 80
process
On 17.11.2012 22:12, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I updated the first ASF web server from 2.4.1 to 2.4.3. It is running
the service for mail-archives.apache.org in US, so you can reach it via
mail-archives.us.apache.org. It is being proxied by www.apache.org.
One strange thing: the /server
After upgrading mail-archives I checked the APR error messages the
instance writes. Those are not new, they were also written for the odl
version.
The messages are due to the fact, that the old and the new bundled apr
versions are compiled without iconv support. So mod_mbox can not convert
Subject says it all. Instances look stable during the last few hours.
On 27.11.2012 14:51, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:50:37 -
rj...@apache.org wrote:
+/* Special case utf8: it is often unknown (no alias) */
+if (!strcmp(charset, utf8)) {
charset was uppercased just before this (at least when called from
within this source file),
On 12.12.2012 15:14, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Wed Dec 12 14:14:39 2012
New Revision: 1420687
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1420687view=rev
Log:
ivote
...
Log:
ipromote
Aaaah, Steve Jobs also was a vi user ;)
Regards,
Rainer
I played around with the current backport proposal for balancer
persistence, ie. persisting config changes applied to proxy balancer via
the Balancer Manager GUI interface to disk and reloading them during
startup.
I made some observations. My setup uses a globally defined balancer with
two
On 14.12.2012 13:39, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
- The Used count in balancer manager drops to 0 after restart/reboot
with persist on. It seems the slot management is not completely right.
Not yet further investigated
On 12.12.2012 14:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
We have just a handful of backports in STATUS, and most are
awaiting just a single additional +1 to be approved.
Let's push on clearing STATUS and getting a 2.4.4 out before
the Christmas holiday...
I'm all for it.
Rainer
On 14.12.2012 17:11, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/14/2012 01:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- The Used count in balancer manager drops to 0 after restart/reboot
with persist on. It seems the slot management is not completely right.
Not yet further investigated.
IMHO this should actually
On 12.12.2012 14:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
We have just a handful of backports in STATUS, and most are
awaiting just a single additional +1 to be approved.
Let's push on clearing STATUS and getting a 2.4.4 out before
the Christmas holiday...
Test suite for 2.4 at least for my Solaris 10
On 15.12.2012 13:34, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Sat Dec 15 12:34:56 2012
New Revision: 1422234
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1422234view=rev
Log:
const fixes for mod_imagemap, fatal on old xlc due to returning apr_table_get
result
from non const function.
On 16.12.2012 15:42, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sun Dec 16 14:42:17 2012
New Revision: 1422584
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1422584view=rev
Log:
Add a comment.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 17.12.2012 09:53, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 16 Dec 2012, at 4:51 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Graham, can you give an example? I don't get the any attempt at setting
any directive silently unsets an arbitrary selection of other proxy
directives at the same time.
Take
On 03.01.2013 03:06, Eric Covener wrote:
I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original vote
thread was more of a discussion. I wanted to record a formal vote here
so I can link to it.
Pending IP clearance...
[+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility
On 04.01.2013 19:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Have people had a chance to test, review and try the balancer
persist and inheritance stuff in trunk? I want to make
sure that we have some level of verification and agreement
there before I work on the backports for 2.4 ;)
I didn't see any changes
either be both persisted or both reset.
Regards,
Rainer
On Jan 5, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 04.01.2013 19:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Have people had a chance to test, review and try the balancer
persist and inheritance stuff in trunk? I want to make
... let me go thru my notes. I seem to recall
an issue I hit.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
+1 for both being reset...
On Jan 7, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 06.01.2013 17:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I had thought that I has
On 10.01.2013 14:01, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jan 10 13:01:46 2013
New Revision: 1431331
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431331view=rev
Log:
Merge r1418524 from trunk:
Use ap_rputs instead of ap_rvputs where applicable.
Submitted by: jailletc36
Forget this, it was already backported as part of 1420696.
Sorry for the noise.
Rainer
On 10.01.2013 14:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.01.2013 14:01, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jan 10 13:01:46 2013
New Revision: 1431331
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431331view=rev
On 11.01.2013 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I think we are quite close to a 2.4.4 release, with just
a handful of open proposals in STATUS. If people could
review, test and vote, that would be great.
I can do something on Sunday. At least vote in the balancer proposals.
Regards,
Rainer
On 21.01.2013 15:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the
Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between
a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On,
if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A
and B get their own
On 25.01.2013 14:21, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Vote
[XX] +1: I support this proposal
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
+1
Thanks!
Rainer
On 27.01.2013 01:08, gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013
New Revision: 1439000
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1439000view=rev
Log:
mod_lua image size has surpassed 0x0001, step it up a notch
Modified:
On 29.01.2013 11:19, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to attend (first time) the FOSDEM this year and would like to
know if there is a chance to meet Apache httpd developers there. I
didn't find a dedicated httpd event in the schedule. Is there any other
typical event or occasion where
On 01.02.2013 16:24, Eric Covener wrote:
+1, and thanks for offering to RM :)
+1 on both counts!
+1
On 05.02.2013 18:12, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently working on an Apache module that needs to maintain some
shared data that is used by all requests, on all workers. This data does
not need to be persistent, so I thought about using shared memory for
this task. Someone pointed me
On 06.02.2013 17:28, Micha Lenk wrote:
On 02/05/2013 08:04 PM CEST +02:00, Rainer Jung wrote:
Example code using it: modules/cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c should be
simplest, look for slotmem and SLOTMEM in there. That should at least
show how to bootstrap and use slotmem.
Okay, the longer I
On 12.02.2013 12:43, Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
len = strlen(srequest);
Don't we need to remove this line as well? srequest is now data.
Oups, yes, sorry and thanks.
Fixed in r1445120.
Rainer
On 15.02.2013 11:48, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I plan to tag between late Friday 15 Feb eve, and Saturday. The
remaining STATUS items only have a vote or two, or are contested
and can't really be expected to hit this tag. It might be a bit
late to add more to STATUS for consideration, but
On 05.02.2013 23:12, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The 2.2 builds all used OpenSSL 0.9.8 and that's where I would leave
it, while 2.4 builds aught to use 1.0.1.
+1
That, and libxml2 and lua
are the packages we don't bundle.
Those are additional 2.4 modules dependencies. +1 to bundle the
On 15.02.2013 12:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
Some propaganda: the STATUS item mod_proxy_ajp: Support unknown HTTP
methods. PR54416. has two votes (mine and wrowe). The situation was
worsened in 2.2.21 due to a fix for CVE-2011-3348. It would be nice to
fix it in 2.2.24, fix is very similar
On 15.02.2013 17:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I guess the other question is whether 2.2.24 should be tagged with the
original apr-util 1.3 family, or whether we should pick up 1.5.1? And
back to the older 2.2.23 sources, should it be the then-current apr-util
that was bundled in the .tar.gz
On 15.02.2013 18:21, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 15.02.2013 17:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I guess the other question is whether 2.2.24 should be tagged with the
original apr-util 1.3 family, or whether we should pick up 1.5.1? And
back to the older 2.2.23 sources, should it be the then-current
On 16.02.2013 18:17, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:54 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
+if (lp-protocol strcasecmp(lp-protocol, https) == 0) {
Should this be ap_listeners? There is no local lp in my 2.2.x and
currently does not build (but I also just recently did a
On 16.02.2013 15:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan to TR on Monday (Feb 18) afternoon (eastern time)...
On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I think it's about time for 2.4.4... just a handful
of proposed backports are still open. I propose we
do a TR the end of
On 16.02.2013 19:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:48:42 -0600
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I plan to tag between late Friday 15 Feb eve, and Saturday. The
remaining STATUS items only have a vote or two, or are contested
and can't really be expected to
On 18.02.2013 19:02, Eric Covener wrote:
I am on the road right now, but a user reported that my fix to make
rewritebase merging opt-in is busted and breaks normal override by
default. Can someone look/repair/propose for 24?
You beat me to it.
If we think that the merging/inheritance of
On 18.02.2013 19:45, Michael Felt wrote:
I really need to learn how to do the tests you guys do. iirc it is not
as simple as make check or make test.
For starters there's a README at:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/test/framework/trunk/README?view=co
You'll need Perl plus the Perl module
On 18.02.2013 19:45, Michael Felt wrote:
It will wait til 2.2.25 if it must, but I have some scripts to
autostart/stop httpd on AIX - must load a system to see if they are
already in 2.2.X. If not, who can I send the changes to?
You should start with a script for 2.4.x. Example is the file
On 18.02.2013 21:36, Eric Covener wrote:
Ok, so 2.2.23 had not suffered this regression yet? If not, we should
just move ahead and then can consider any improved behavior in 2.2.x.
There are no changes to mod_rewrite in 2.2.x since 2.2.23 was tagged.
2.2.23 has _a_ rewritebase regression
On 18.02.2013 21:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.02.2013 21:36, Eric Covener wrote:
Ok, so 2.2.23 had not suffered this regression yet? If not, we should
just move ahead and then can consider any improved behavior in 2.2.x.
There are no changes to mod_rewrite in 2.2.x since 2.2.23 was tagged
On 18.02.2013 22:16, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:53:16 +0100
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 18.02.2013 21:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.02.2013 21:36, Eric Covener wrote:
The regression in 2.2.23 is that RewriteBase started to get merged
in 2.2.23
On 19.02.2013 04:35, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine but operation now fails on all mysql auths (included APR
problem from -deps ??)
reports: APR-util Version: 1.5.1
[Tue Feb 19 13:16:33.487932 2013] [auth_basic:error] [pid 24811:tid
2996689776] [client xxx] AH01617: user noel:
On 18.02.2013 21:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.4 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.4 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 19.02.2013 18:06, Eric Covener wrote:
authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later.
... which means: don't simply try to a run a 2.2 config under 2.4.
Rainer
On 19.02.2013 18:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Never mind... this is expected. It's been awhile since I looked
at that codepath.
FWIW, not seeing crashes on any MPM yet on OSX.
And after a graceful restart with two listeners the old processes (apart
from the parent) are no longer in the process
On 19.02.2013 19:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 19, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.02.2013 18:03, schrieb Rainer Jung:
Plattform is Solaris 10 Sparc. I would be interested in hearing if
anyone else can reproduce. Will try myself on Linux later
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
Short version: child processes that do not manage to acquire the accept
mutex during graceful restart and before the next generation child
processes
On 20.02.2013 01:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
Short version: child processes that do not manage to acquire the accept
mutex during graceful restart
On 20.02.2013 01:20, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Here's what I see concerning the graceful restart problem on Solaris.
Setup using the prefork MPM with two http listeners. Accept mutex is
pthread.
maybe https
On 20.02.2013 01:39, Noel Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:03 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, so we know it is correctly retrieving the hash and the aces control
really fails in the apu password_validate.
Next: Could you please
grep CRYPT /path/to/build/apache/srclib/apr-util/config.status
On 20.02.2013 08:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:42:56 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 23:31 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Note he mentioned SHA512, not crypt(). I don't know that this makes
a difference on that
On 20.02.2013 13:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Should we be including/moving this discussion to dev@apr ?
I guess so. Strong evidence that the problem sits in
apr_password_validate as part of apu 1.5.1.
Regards,
Rainer
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote
On 19.02.2013 18:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm I'm not seeing crashes, ...
Concerning the crashes using prefork on Solaris 10. I have a
reproduction scenario, but I need to load lots of modules. But then the
stacks look very similar to the problem described in
On 20.02.2013 22:33, Noel Butler wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:07 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
2) Keep original validation code but ad some debug output to STDERR:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/apr-util-password_validate-debug.patch
http://people.apache.org/%7Erjung/patches/apr
On 21.02.2013 21:32, Jim Jagielski wrote:
So far, I just see one -1 from rjung due to the weird Solaris
bug he's hitting, but it also seems Sol10 specific. The
-deps bug appears more (only) an APR issue and not something
with httpd itself, so ... ;)
I see two issues on Solaris:
- PR 49504,
301 - 400 of 1303 matches
Mail list logo
