William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync)
contain the following tarballs for approval
httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5]
I counted 7+1, 0-1. Thanks everyone.
I'd like to propose we ship apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Roy has started the details spelled out at http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
and I'm certain he will complete them sometime shortly, here. That's a red
flag that prevents us from
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Do note that not all users that will chose the SSL package will know how
to correctly fill in the fields.
s/not all/a small minority of/
They can't figure out what Domain Name means, let's be serious :)
On 1/10/07, *Issac Goldstand* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
Issac Goldstand wrote:
I'd agree if mod_ssl is disabled by default, but if it is, why are they
downloading the mod_ssl-enabled installer?
You miss the point, it's illegal in some jurisdictions to possess/use
such cryptography. That installer will remain as a service to those
communities,
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Hi,
could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in
bugzilla?
Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the
release process?
This issue pops up regulary after each release.
My bad, sorry, it's already been done.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Thu Jan 11 14:48:47 2007
New Revision: 495422
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=495422
Log:
* - Clarified location of release.sh script
- minotaur is an internal server name. Replaced it with people.apache.org
- Added a
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:11:18PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
Yes, Closed should be the final resting place for bug reports, for
good or for bad.
What is the difference between a RESOLVED bug and a CLOSED one? Is
it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED
I mostly concur with Justin
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 1/18/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mod_ftp PPMC has voted on graduation and it was approved[1].
We are now asking the httpd PMC to approve graduation.
+1.
+1
One topic for discussion is whether it should be a
I'd like to propose one of a few solutions that the pkgconfig crap has caused
when --with-ssl=/path/to/ssl specifies a nonstandard location.
After evaluating that path, we proceed to pull up the irrelevant settings from
some default pkgconfig/openssl.pc that has nothing to do with /path/to/ssl
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
Whereupon, I was told that upper management would prefer to have
something rather more official than my word on it.
Ok, you offer them one :)
ASF projects make no warranties. If you want to dredge up the old Y2K
comments from the site svn history it's probably
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is there anything to say other than (for httpd, for example):
Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time zone
information. Instead, information is retrieved from the operating
system. Relevant operating system updates must be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If there is, do the developers need help with it? I can write C and I am
willing to help out with this. If there is not, Would anyone from the Apache
team be interested in working with me so I may write such functionality,
maybe for a future version of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. If there is, do the developers need help with it? I can write C and I am
willing to help out with this. If there is not, Would anyone from the
Apache team be interested in working with me so I may write such
functionality, maybe
Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:59:46 +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:45:12PM +0100, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
Users have a problem with directory listings generated by mod_autoindex:
It is not possible to control the character setting which which the
I'm almost thinking that a --qq or -q -v sort of option could provide the
pretty-print format. Once nice thing about the raw version is that it's
more directly usable as input to other things.
Thoughts?
Sander Temme wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 1:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It always
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
As a totally optional addition, it might be possible to let
mod_autoindex figure out the actual encoding, and automatically set an
appropriate character set. There are some more details in
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=153557 .
Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:37 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm almost thinking that a --qq or -q -v sort of option could provide the
pretty-print format. Once nice thing about the raw version is that it's
more directly usable as input to other things.
+1
Like below
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Would the following change in mod_cache.h require a major bump or would a
minor bump be enough?
APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN(apr_status_t,
ap_cache_generate_key,
-(request_rec *r, apr_pool_t*p, char**key ));
+
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
As 3rd parties might want to use the provider interface to provide their own
storage
providers it might be worth discussing if we *should* make this a public API
and should
install it via make install.
Someone probably has ;-) That said, +1 for this in trunk/httpd
All hooks may see any connection (likewise, with other hooks). The trick
is how to 'go away' and ignore/decline handling it.
mod_ftp looks for a server's FTP On directive setting in the server host
context to decide to pick up and handle the connection. Since vhosts
can be configured for
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Summary of mod_ftp graduation voting:
+1 on graduation (acceptance of code to httpd):
Don't forget Nick in the final tally :)
I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.
Ping?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.
Ping?
I mostly bring this up because the reports are due in about three days,
and it would be worthwhile to post
George Cox wrote:
I'm going to wade in here, and hopefully add something of value. If I
don't, please flame as hard as you can etc. I've written a module which
automatically rotates access logs. It's called mod_log_access, and the
latest version is available at:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Has anyone successfully built httpd on Vista with the SDK and bundled
compiler?
Bundled compiler? If Vista or the most recent SDK includes a C compiler,
it would be news to me. Pointers?
Issac Goldstand wrote:
I think it's the compilers that come with vs 2005 express editions.
Then the answer I suppose is ... yes. 2005 compiles are working fine.
FWIW, if you are trying to build from the GUI - that's it's own can
of worms, it mis-parses the RC flags from the .dsp upon
As originally conceived, Limit METH METH2 was designed to handle
a very limited (once 30, now 62) different possible methods and
assign them a specific Satisfy/Require/Allow/Deny/Order directive
pattern that otherwise has no corresponding value for the un-Limit'ed
method possibilities. The model
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:00:09 -0600
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fundamental weakness of Limit is that it requires a module
to cooperate proactively, and many modules don't. That gives it
different semantics to other standard containers.
Yes
Paul Querna wrote:
So, I've been kicking around some ideas about where I personally would
like trunk to go for a couple months now.
My personal goals for 3.0:
- Write some cool stuff, that is fun to hack on.
- Create an environment that encourages others to contribute, A project
this
NICE. I agree that this is more in-spec with 2616, so consider this
my +1 for backport to 2.2, 2.0, 1.3 branches for whomever wants to
apply this patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Feb 14 05:34:38 2007
New Revision: 507526
URL:
Paul Querna wrote:
This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list enables
a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If others
can make designs work with 'lessor' requirements, all the better, but
I'm not worried about it.
Proposed Requirements:
- C99
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:28 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's always been small groups ;-) But we are loathe to drop the 'barrier
to entry' of demonstrating that the new coder is 'cluefull'. This is a
server platform, rife with the security issues that go along
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe the httpd project is ready for a push towards the next major
version.
But do we really want to start by calling it 3.0? How about if we
work off of a few code names first? Say, for example, amsterdam.
The
Paul Querna wrote:
+1 to moving goal and discussion to a SVN file and starting a sandbox
(same level as tags/branches?)
Nooo - it is another sort of branch/, so belongs there.
We could have a separate place, but why? branches/n.n.x should always
sort before branches/async-foo,
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I was planning on creating
repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/amsterdam/
and then moving the GSoC stuff to other subdirectories of that
sandbox. I prefer to think of branches as forks off of trunk,
whereas the sandbox would not be.
Ok... that's another way.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Feb 15 07:14:25 2007
New Revision: 507956
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=507956
Log:
Actually, I think this should be a show-stopper, since the
current behavior is broke broke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
+* mod_proxy: ProxyTimeout (and others) ignored due to not merging
+ the *_set params.
+ PR# 11540
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=507516
+ (Note: includes some not applicable to 2.0.x)
+ +1:
Houston - I believe we have liftoff!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] podling Vote Thread
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] podling Vote Summary
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 binding +1 votes (and 1 nonbinding +1) by mod_ftp to exit the
incubator as an httpd sub-project.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. mod_ftp be a httpd sub-project (ala mod_box)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mod_ftp/trunk/
needs a new home (there are no tags or remaining branches).
Can I suggest;
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/trunk/
for the time being?
2. mod_ftp will use the httpd lists
This is already publicly documented on bugtraq; forwarding here for
the benefit of the developers who may not have seen these comments.
---BeginMessage---
There's a new advisory at:
http://www.infohacking.com/INFOHACKING_RESEARCH/Our_Advisories/apache/index.html
Summarizing:
1.- HTTP 404 error
1. mod_ftp be a httpd sub-project (ala mod_box)
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mod_ftp/trunk/
It is now *CLOSED* (gone, in fact, if you look in /incubator)...
and has a new home (thanks Roy) here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/trunk/
To move over your currently
With the posting of these notifications, and record of the
http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ - there are no further
obstacles to posting http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi
and uncommenting/updating the ! commented out text in
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I note that Flood refers only to ASF code; if we want to ship a binary
for folks to flood their test machines from win32 boxes (including https)
we still need to ?
... have an item in our list for flood-0.4+openssl?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: httpd/mod_ftp/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_ftp.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/mod_ftp/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_ftp.xml?view=diffrev=508962r1=508961r2=508962
==
Binary
Paul Querna wrote:
Events since November:
- next generation aka 'amsterdamn' discussions started
W.r.t. Per November report; new sandbox tree created for active
experimentation with Apache 3.0 potential directions and
proofs-of-concepts, reviewing branches/(existing experiments)
to prune or to
Would the respective committers of these experimental branches please
determine if yours 1. are dead (and svn rm them) or 2. are still useful
(and svn mv them into /asf/repos/httpd/sandbox/)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/
Branch Revsion Last-Change Committer
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release.
As such... I'm requesting review and feedback of the first installer
package candidate to include ssl...
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
NOTIFICATION: http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
Something I notice about this page; does it make sense to explode the
visible hyperlink under Controlled Source to include the text of the
URI, e.g. ASF becomes ASF
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 17, 2007, at 4:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
All US legal obligations are satisfied. Correct?
Correct.
Thanks for confirmation. Rather than 'push this out' - I've started a
dialog (at least, I hope it becomes more than typing into the bitbucket)
about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I hv recently upgraded kernel of my box to linux 2.6 and also
glibc to 2.3.4. One of my custom apache 2.2 modules which was working
earlier fine is crashing now.
Anybody faced similar problem?
Present a backtrace? Try turning EnableMMAP/EnableSendfile
Devi Krishna wrote:
I am trying to get mod_proxy_http to work in pass through mode for NTLM
authentication. I see that in apache proxy we dont keep the backend
connection persistant. This causes NTLM to fail because on receiving
type2 message from client, the proxy forwards this to the
I'm contemplating an HTTP/1.1-only solution, available only if the client
is willing to present expect-header 100-continue, which would involve
no buffering.
Bill
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/03/2007 09:50 PM, Kevin wrote:
Hi List-
This isn't a support question, so please don't ignore it.
Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:16:52 -0600
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm contemplating an HTTP/1.1-only solution, available only if the
client is willing to present expect-header 100-continue, which would
involve no buffering.
In principle:
+1 if it doesn't
Kevin wrote:
Additionally, I've added the following to the bug report:
Sorry. I should have added above that there are no client certificates
involved in these uploads. I'm not savvy enough about the internals of
either apache or plone to know, but I suppose that means it's possible
Kevin wrote:
Is it your take then, that this problem only manifests itself in a
poorly designed web application? If so, I'll pass that along to the
plone developers and maybe they need to modify some of their code.
That's not what that article, or a host of others, has to say about the
Kevin wrote:
Do I understand correctly from this comment that if a user connects to
the site using a client certificate, and if the SSLClientVerify step
happens before the attempted post operation, that the problem won't
occur? If so, then I should be home free, because with plone, one must
Jason Jones wrote:
Can I ask what the status is on utilizing OpenSSL's FIPS mode with
mod_ssl?
No news from me yet - I've just finished helping migrate mod_ftp out
of incubation into httpd project, and have one more critical patch to
bring it into the 21.1'nd century (EPSV/EPRT
Trent Nelson wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And I had also just finished the non-ASF release of current
mod_aspdotnet code, removing the final nail from that coffin.
H, has this been publicized anywhere? Can you point me to its new
non-ASF home?
Was crossposted
I'm planning to rename
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/fips-dev/
to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/Gaithersburg/
just to prevent anyone from mis-understanding the current state of
that sandbox, and follow our newborn place-naming convention. I'm
aware of
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote:
present. Also other issues like noise in the log file. I've also
seen people complaining that GET / might incur the cost of
dynamic content generation for /.
Hm. Just thinking loud. Can we avoid this if we replace GET /
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote:
present. Also other issues like noise in the log file. I've also
seen people complaining that GET / might incur the cost of
dynamic content generation for /.
Hm. Just thinking loud. Can we avoid
Joe Orton wrote:
Can you get rid of the branches of apr/apr-util? They have no place in
the httpd SVN tree.
As 'solving' a build of apache httpd to follow the fips security policy
of openssl requires a similarly fips-ified apr/apr-util, I'll leave those
in place. When you've svn'ed all the
Sander Temme wrote:
+1. No sense confusing anyone with regards to crypto.
Why Gaithersburg?
http://csrc.nist.gov/ :)
A play on the new city name convention, yes.
James Park (pencil_ethics) wrote:
mod_aspdotnet lives! Does this mean I should update my (presently rather
dated) patch that provides .NET 2.0 support against the new code?
As an aside, I managed to rid the code of that ugly _gcA_gcA_gcString.cs
file :)
OT :) Yes' would entirely greet anyone
set OPENSSL_CONF=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\Apache2.2\conf\openssl.cnf, I get the error message Unable
to load config info from C:\Program Files\Apache Software
Foundation\Apache2.2\conf\openssl.cnf
When I do the set without the double quotes, it works. Ugh. Wrapper time?
Renamed to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/gaithersburg/
Someone on irc reminded me that amsterdam was named in lower-case.
Bill
Joshua Slive wrote:
I just deleted all our binary releases from before 2005 that were
sitting in our recommended releases directory. They are, of course,
all still available from archive.apache.org.
+1 - I offered up that we aught to purge all majorly insecure versions
a while back - thank
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone mind if I fold it into trunk and maybe have us
consider making it part of 2.2 (even under experimental)?
+1 to trunk! No opinion yet on 2.2 (I'm not a big fan of growing
the stable branch since it entirely defeats the drive to release
2.next, ever.)
No docs yet
Nick Kew wrote:
I'm even more confused now, because I thought you were with Covalent,
and I understood from Will that mod_line_edit was widely used by
clients of Covalent. Please tell me what I'm missing?
Just to ensure I'm not misquoted, I know I've suggested mod_line_edit
to a few
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Bill told me about mod_line_edit maybe 3-4 days ago.
I had known about mod_proxy_html, which is also something
we've pointed clients to, so maybe that's where
the confusion comes from.
Good point - in my experience mod_proxy_html is much more broadly
adopted both by our
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Is this sed or pcre syntax? I'm a bit confused :)
It's a mutant ;) But, of course, we maintain
that confusion internally with regex's being pcre...
Of course :) But it appears to be a tiny fraction
Chris Kukuchka wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile a module against the Apache 2.2.4 codebase using
Visual C++ .NET. The compile stops with an error fatal error RC1107:
invalid usage. From what I can tell, I am having trouble with the
resource compiler not liking some extra quotes. Is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll be offline most of tomorrow and pretty much the whole
weekend. Unless I hear vetos, I'll commit the latest
mod_sed_filter.c to trunk. If we change the name, which
is fine with me, well... that's the joy of svn move :)
I was going to throw in one last beg/ for
I'd like to propose we make two changes on Win32.
1st; deprecate the Win32DisableAcceptEx directive (axe it entirely from
trunk), and change the default to..
AcceptFilter none
with options of
AcceptFilter ex
AcceptFilter data
Either form will trigger the AcceptEx code path, the later
Nope - it won't. Where does z/OS define the crypt() prototype?
The correct patch is to ask APR_HAS_CRYPT (which we need to provide
by patching apr, if we don't already.)
If APR didn't detect crypt, adding crypt() style p/w's to htdbm,
htpasswd etc will still be a noop.
Bill
David Jones wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
APR doesn't pretend to figure out for APR apps exactly what the system
provides, though there is currently a spotty set of APR_HAS_foo.
Meanwhile, httpd goes and searches on its own for things APR doesn't
tell anyone about. I'm curious about other opinions on whether
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Did anyone else have feedback on the comments/notes? I know Roy's made some
additional progress with the notification
Marc Stern wrote:
For info, I developed for the Belgian government, a reverse proxy
installation script (Unix/Windows) that encompasses a certificate
creation, and its registration in the config file. This uses gawk.
It is available on
Sander Temme wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Don't know about the shm session cache. Otherwise, the quotation issues
are fairly minor. I see that in trunk on unix we quote paths, and in
extra/httpd-ssl.conf we don't. Time to rigorously quote every path
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to propose we ship
apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi with
this release. Couple of notes...
Did anyone else have feedback
/ resolution?
David Jones
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/16/07, *Jeff Trawick* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
APR doesn't
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
httpd does not ;-)
httpd the project (vs. apr, apr-util), not httpd the program (vs.
htdbm, htpasswd)
as in In httpd, we don't call crypt(), we call APR...
So... what I suggest is;
1. use the same test from
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
httpd does not ;-)
httpd the project (vs. apr, apr-util), not httpd the program (vs.
htdbm, htpasswd)
as in In httpd, we don't call crypt(), we call APR...
So... what I suggest
httpd was patched for httpd -v some time ago to report both the compiled
and loaded versions of apr[-util].
I'd like to get this into trunk/2.2/2.0 similarly for openssl.
It's very common for users to hotfix openssl for security vulnerabilities,
but the apache error log remains 'scary' to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd was patched for httpd -v some time ago to report both the compiled
and loaded versions of apr[-util].
I'd like to get this into trunk/2.2/2.0 similarly for openssl.
It's very common for users to hotfix openssl for security vulnerabilities,
but the apache
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd was patched for httpd -v some time ago to report both the compiled
and loaded versions of apr[-util].
I'd like to get this into trunk/2.2/2.0 similarly for openssl.
It's very common for users to hotfix openssl for security
Guenter Knauf wrote:
I've heard from a couple of users that they prefer *.zip archives
rather than the *.msi files; and hacked a WSH script to fix the config
files when using a zip distribution.
Should we add a cert-creation .sh and .vbs script to support/ for this
purpose (on any platform)?
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
I would find it useful to have the SVN revision info in the head of
the sources;
No, that is not going to happen. Id tags make it extremely hard to
manage collaborative development across multiple subversion trees,
Sander Temme wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 12:22 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
I've heard from a couple of users that they prefer *.zip archives
rather than the *.msi files; and hacked a WSH script to fix the config
files when using a zip distribution.
Should we add
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
* Play well with mod_cache, if a file has been requested with HTTP a
FTP request should reuse the cached copy. Last time I checked
mod_ftp only did subrequests which mod_cache didn't act on.
In terms of using 'top level' requests in lieu of subrequests, it's
not
David Jones wrote:
ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level that just checks platforms
for htdbm.c
Also appended is the semi-related patch for htpasswd.c that adds TPF to
the platforms checked in 2 cases where its missed, which seems like an
oversight.
+1
Rational
1. sed is a Turing complete language, this module does not attempt to be.
http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/scripts/turing.txt
2. filter has become implicit; any module handling the request body
contents in cooperation with other modules is a filter.
3. 's'tream'ed'itor filter
I know of no restrictions on a unix-like system that would interfere
with choosing any arbitrary charset. Your post doesn't actually
describe what problem you observed after setting LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1.
Michael B Allen wrote:
No one has an answer for this?
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:09:42
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
is it possible that with your last commit changes you forgot to update
mod_ftp.h too?
Feh - yup. My bad - thanks!
also want to ask if it is ok when I add NetWare makefiles?
Be our guest :) Keep it mind it's ment to be built against installed
httpd, or built in
The man8/ directory doesn't seem appropriate for the current contents
we install. Notably, ab and logresolve are certainly not dedicated to
the role of httpd, but are independently useful binaries.
Beyond that, apxs doesn't seem to quite fit that role.
ab.8apxs.8 httpd.8
Not acked.
---BeginMessage---
To whom it may concern,
The attached advisory and email was originally submitted on Feb 08, 2006, but a
response has not yet been received. In accordance with our vendor disclosure
policy (http://labs.idefense.com/legal.php#disclosure) we will proceed with
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Not acked.
Acked now. Bloody Hell
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Not acked.
Well, I've notified Joshua of our inadvertent disclosure, and welcome
dev@ feedback and analysis of the specifics in the report (w.r.t. 1.3,
2.0, and/or 2.2).
We've committed to provide him some update by tomorrow afternoon, as
they would love to publish 1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
dev@ feedback and analysis of the specifics in the report (w.r.t. 1.3,
2.0, and/or 2.2).
quote
At line #500 of the suexec utility, a strncmp() is used to check whether
the current directory is a subdirectory of the document root directory.
This check will succeed
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/29/2007 12:57 PM, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Together with the decision for .8 vs. .1, I suggest to adapt the
sbin/ vs. bin/ installation directories. Traditionally, these user
programs were installed in sbin/ too; but IMO binaries for general
interest should go to
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Ok, I think you are right and they have mixed usage. Compiling a module
would be done by a user whereas installing it might be a task reserved to
root.
Would it make sense to move ap[ru]-1-config and apxs to build/?
AFA apxs is concerned; IMHO, no. The user wants to
301 - 400 of 6128 matches
Mail list logo
