Re: [Result] Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

2012-05-21 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 20.05.2012 14:47, Daniel Gruno wrote: This will effectively make for two (or three) new votes for adopting each piece: - Adopt a privacy policy for the docs and refer to the various tracking methods used as they get implemented - see the draft at

Re: [Result] Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

2012-05-20 Thread Daniel Gruno
Sending to docs@ as well, as this applies to that list too. Grumpiness may occur, so apologies in advance. On 05/19/2012 09:32 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote: Looking at the call for votes [retained below for reference] and at the votes, I'm not sure if the +1 voters were aware of the specific

Re: [Result] Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

2012-05-19 Thread Kaspar Brand
On 07.05.2012 16:02, Daniel Gruno wrote: With an impressive 8 x +1 binding votes and no -1's, as well as +2 from other docs@ readers, I believe we can call this vote passed with flying colors :). Apologies for being late with this, but the specifics of the currently used implementation

[Result] Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

2012-05-07 Thread Daniel Gruno
With an impressive 8 x +1 binding votes and no -1's, as well as +2 from other docs@ readers, I believe we can call this vote passed with flying colors :). We will begin rolling out the commentary system in the trunk docs shortly, and then we'll see where the wind of the web takes us. I suspect