Re: [l10n-dev] Serbian OOo install sets for 3.1

2009-04-06 Thread Marcus Lange
Goran Rakic wrote: Hi Goran, У пон, 06. 04 2009. у 19:38 +0200, Ivo Hinkelmann пише: Hi, how far is the translation status of sr / sh in helpcontent2? Cheers, Ivo 0% committed, about 16% in local SVN repository. UI is at 100% so installation is fully localized. Not providing localized

Re: [l10n-dev] Serbian OOo install sets for 3.1

2009-04-07 Thread Marcus Lange
Goran Rakic wrote: Hi Goran, У пон, 06. 04 2009. у 18:46 +0200, Marcus Lange пише: When you would have a ratio of at least 75% translated UI content and 75% help content, then we can do it. But 0-16% for help is too less. I hope you can understand our argument. That's not news we were

Re: [l10n-dev] Serbian OOo install sets for 3.1

2009-04-09 Thread Marcus Lange
On 04/09/09 17:21, Mathias Bauer wrote: Maho NAKATA wrote: Hi all, From: Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de Subject: Re: [l10n-dev] Serbian OOo install sets for 3.1 Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:36:49 +0200 Marcus Lange wrote: When you would have a ratio of at least 75% translated UI content

Re: [l10n-dev] Needs and restrictions for provideing full install sets

2009-04-15 Thread Marcus Lange
On 04/14/09 22:28, sophie wrote: Hi Sophie, Martin asked about with or without JRE. What is the prerequisite for your languages, could we have a common decision on this or is it a case by case? IMHO we have to come to one solution for all languages. etc. Nobody would be willing to keep the

Re: [l10n-dev] Needs and restrictions for provideing full install sets

2009-04-15 Thread Marcus Lange
On 04/14/09 21:19, André Schnabel wrote: Hi André, - What are the restrictions we have to face? Restricted resources for distribution were mentioned - I'd lik to see concrete numbers here. Esp. the question if these limited resources are under our control or not is important. a few weeks ago

Re: [l10n-dev] Needs and restrictions for provideing full install sets

2009-04-22 Thread Marcus Lange
On 04/22/09 16:18, Stefan Taxhet wrote: Hi Stefan, Btw I couldn't find the policy mentioning the 80% rule(s) in the archive or webpages. I know it has been referenced recently, but where... Anybody with an URL? are you looking for this webpage?

Re: [l10n-dev] Newbie: Basic question on l10n

2009-10-14 Thread Marcus Lange
Abhinav Chaturvedi wrote: Hi Abhinav, I have a rather basic question. Let's suppose I have downloaded OO and am using it in English. I then decide that I would like to see all the application menus, help etc in another language. Can I make the switch through OO itself? If yes, how? Or is it

[l10n-dev] New home for downloading language packs

2009-10-15 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, from time to time there is the question how to download language packs. The normal installation files are quite easily available on the download page. But how to find the langpacks? The power users might be satisfied when they the hint to go to a mirror server but the normal user

Re: [l10n-dev] New home for downloading language packs

2009-10-15 Thread Marcus Lange
wrote: Hi Marcus, On 10/15/09 14:41, Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, from time to time there is the question how to download language packs. The normal installation files are quite easily available on the download page. But how to find the langpacks? The power users might be satisfied when

Re: [l10n-dev] New home for downloading language packs

2009-10-17 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, I think I haven't taken into account the many differences with builds, testing and NL communities. So, I'm sorry if anyone feels offend. This was not my intension or to ignore the situation. I'll think about what could be done to provide the builds to the users (tested or not,

[l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
a final state I would update the index page (http://download.openoffice.org/next), so that both new websites can be found via links and make some announcements. Please tell me what you think about this. Thanks in advance. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, I think I haven't taken

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Martin, as promised I thought about a new structure and have created the following websites to ease the download of RC builds: http://download.openoffice.org/next/other_rc.html The first sentence on this page mentions langpacks, although the page actually lists

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
not as it would be a monster of table. ;-) Best regards Marcus 2009.11.02 13:07, Marcus Lange ras(e.: Hi all, as promised I thought about a new structure and have created the following websites to ease the download of RC builds: http://download.openoffice.org/next/other_rc.html http

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Marcus Lange wrote: I would propose to merge the two pages you created with main http://download.openoffice.org/other.html and http://download.openoffice.org/langpack.html respectively. I've tried this but don't liked it because IMHO this is too much content for a single page. Untested

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Ankit Patel wrote: Thanks for the update. Could you please remove Gujarati (gu-IN)? because there is only one Gujarati language. sure, so we should also cancel the gu-IN build at all? It would be build again for 3.2.0. Best regards Marcus --- On Mon, 2/11/09, Marcus Lange marcus.la

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Rimas Kudelis wrote: Hi Rimas, OK, with the hint of Untested it could work. I've to play with this setup. I tried to start with this but I still think we should not mix stable and unstable builds together: - even so all builds for Mac OS PPC (which are done by Maho) have to be integrsted,

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Martin, maybe the verified builds would get a green check mark icon, and the others a red question mark icon? There should also be a legend stating that builds with the green check mark are supported and verified, whereas the others might not work as expected. That

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, as an alternative I've created a langpack website with all files listed in 2 tables: http://download.openoffice.org/next/langpack_all.html Maybe we can agree on this as commpromise? Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, as promised I thought about a new structure

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
://www.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi?component=l10n Thanks Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Ankit Patel wrote: Thanks for the update. Could you please remove Gujarati (gu-IN)? because there is only one Gujarati language. sure, so we should also cancel the gu-IN build at all? It would be build again

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
mean ... The preceding sentences already say it all: *The software offered in the second table is not recommended for production deployment. Use on own risk.* OK, funny things deleted. ;-) Best regards Marcus 2009/11/2 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi all, as an alternative I've created

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: 2009/11/2 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com because it is the official suffix before it get tested and released. It's the same with a beta release. Yes, they are not released so they remain release candidates, but actually the actual code is same as released version

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-02 Thread Marcus Lange
or wording in the text. Best regards Marcus 2009/11/2 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi all, as an alternative I've created a langpack website with all files listed in 2 tables: http://download.openoffice.org/next/langpack_all.html Maybe we can agree on this as commpromise? Best

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-03 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Martin, BTW: Please don't hit me when I use Firefox as example ;-) but Mozilla has also split it up (fully localized and beta): http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html I am localizing many OS software packages, but not even one requires QA for every language

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-09 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, because IA64 and Linux PPC builds are only available for English US and no other language, I've moved the columns to a separate table below the first one. This will save a bit space to the right hand side. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi, I've done some further changes

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-11 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, when there are no further comments, then I'll start to bring both sites to the new location at download.openoffice.org/other.html and download.openoffice.org/langpack.html. Thanks Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi, because IA64 and Linux PPC builds are only available for English US

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-16 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, both websites are now online. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, when there are no further comments, then I'll start to bring both sites to the new location at download.openoffice.org/other.html and download.openoffice.org/langpack.html. Thanks Marcus Marcus

[l10n-dev] Info: New structure for the download websites

2009-11-19 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, since today we have a new structure for the download websites: http://download.openoffice.org Reasons: 1. Many RCs cannot be/weren't approved and promoted to a stable build. One reason is of course that many native lang teams do not have big resources but also that they builds are

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-19 Thread Marcus Lange
, Nov 16, 2009 at 18:48, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi all, both websites are now online. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, when there are no further comments, then I'll start to bring both sites to the new location at download.openoffice.org/other.html

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-19 Thread Marcus Lange
Rimas Kudelis wrote: 2009.11.16 18:48, Marcus Lange rašė: both websites are now online. Hi Rimas, Cool, thanks! One thingy though: I think you could remove the sub-yellow and sub-orange divs. They don't seem to be useful (as opposed to the sub-green div), and IMO may only cause unneeded

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2009-11-23 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Martin, I was warned again by Slovenian community about the wording of the Disclaimer on the download site (http://download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html ): *OpenOffice.org 3.1.1 RC2 - untested full installation sets* *Disclaimer: The software in the following table is

[l10n-dev] Re: [distro-dev] broken links for Hebrew site

2009-12-04 Thread Marcus Lange
Laurie Marr wrote: Hi Laurie, It seems that all of the links on http://mirror.isoc.org.il/ such as http://mirror.isoc.org.il/pub/openoffice/3.0.0/win32/OOo_3.0.0_he_install_win32_20090327.exe are broken. thanks for the hint. Unfortunately, I've no access to this site to have a look. You

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Full install set for Bengali (bn)

2009-12-21 Thread Marcus Lange
Jamil Ahmed wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Jamil Ahmed wrote: Hi Jamil, Bengali (bn) team have submitted more then 98% translation of both UI + Help for 3.2 release. But in the rc1 release [0] there is no full installation available

[l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Full install set for Bengali (bn)

2009-12-22 Thread Marcus Lange
Jamil Ahmed wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Jamil Ahmed wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi Jamil, OK, I've uploaded them to the mirror network. Additionally they should be available hopefully

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Full install set for Bengali (bn)

2009-12-22 Thread Marcus Lange
builds and Serbian builds have wrong paths to downloads on the RC1 download page. Lp, m. 2009/12/22 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Jamil Ahmed wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Jamil Ahmed wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Marcus Lange

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Full install set for Bengali (bn)

2009-12-22 Thread Marcus Lange
release 3.2.0 is minor release 3.2.1 would be micro release When we release 3.2.0 with a defined set of languages (full sets and langpacks), this set would be used for 3.2.1, too. Best regards Marcus On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 18:30, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi Ain, I cannot

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Full install set for Bengali (bn)

2009-12-22 Thread Marcus Lange
Marcus Lange wrote: Just to be sure to use the same terms: I'm sorry, of course I mean Just to be sure that we both speak about the same terms. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 18:30, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi Ain, I cannot find your language (et) on the Pootle servers. Have

Re: [l10n-dev] QA process for l10n builds

2010-01-04 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Dooteo, for 3.2.0 RC1 there is already a full installation set for Basque (eu), so no need to open an issue for building this language. We will do this also for the next RC and a possible 3.2.1. For entering this into QATrack no issue is necessary. Just login and enter the respective

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-11 Thread Marcus Lange
suso wrote: Hi, I still need to have QATrack to be turned operative. Could anybody please give me instructions on how to proceed in order to get RC2 binaries TCM tested, QATrack approved and then officially released, in this situation? Thanks to all the people who is helping us with this! :)

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-11 Thread Marcus Lange
Rafaella Braconi wrote: On 01/11/10 11:51, Joost Andrae wrote: Hi Rafaella, every OOo user should be able to login into QATrack by using his/her OOo user account. If somebody needs a role as OOo l10n QA lead then he/she needs to ask for this role within the QA mailing list. Per or myself

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Rafaella Braconi wrote: Kevin Scannell ha scritto: Hi Rafaella, The Irish team has a complete localization but somehow we were omitted from the RC2 builds at the link you give below. See http://l10n.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107057. Is there anything we can do to get

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Martin, FYI The upload of builds (Dev build, Beta, RC etc.) will be announced on the relea...@ooo mailing list. When the download is possible it's announced on d...@qa. Best regards Marcus Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Wait, Rafaella, are RC2 builds already built and available somewhere?

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Rafaella Braconi wrote: Hi Rafaella, thanks for reporting! I've commented and reassigned the issue. If the RC2 build is not available in Irish (ga) will be built and uploaded. do you know if the criteria are full-filled (see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_criteria;)? The

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
builds, but probably they must still be uploaded? Lp, m. 2010/1/13 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net Thanks. Lp, m. 2010/1/13 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi Martin, FYI The upload of builds (Dev build, Beta, RC etc.) will be announced on the relea...@ooo mailing list. When the download

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
a diffierence. Best regards Marcus 2010/1/13 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi Martin, as defined by the Release Status Meeting on Monday there will be only JRE builds (except for Linux 32/64-bit Debian and Mac OS) as we have not that much space on the extended mirror system. Because we

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
it and give us a link so we can download it and distribute it through our own webspace, even if not OOo-approved. Most Windows users here would prefer them. Then you can delete it from your disks forever. Lp, m. 2010/1/13 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi Martin, as defined by the Release Status

Re: [l10n-dev] Please prepare for 3.2RC2 l10n binaries sanity check next week

2010-01-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Marcus Lange wrote: Rafaella Braconi wrote: Hi Kevin, thanks for reporting! I've commented and reassigned the issue. If the RC2 build is not available in Irish (ga) will be built and uploaded. do you know if the criteria are full-filled (see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki

[l10n-dev] 3.2.0 RC3 - Which files will be build and uploaded?

2010-01-15 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi l10n teams, for the RC2 we have provided mostly builds with included JRE due to the limited space on the extended mirrors. It seems this was not the best way to fit all needs. For the coming RC3 we have calculated more detailed and will therefore provide the following build matrix: -

Re: [l10n-dev] QATrack doubt

2010-01-17 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi suso and all, the upload and availability notifications are sent to relea...@ooo and d...@qa.ooo. Is it helpful to send it additionally to this mailing list, too? Best regards Marcus suso wrote: Hey, thank you all for you massive and really fast answer! It's nice to be working in a so

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x developer snapshot build DEV300_m70 available

2010-01-22 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300_m70 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.3.0 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version.

[l10n-dev] Cleanup of mirrored installation sets - 3.2.0 RC3

2010-01-25 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, to be able to upload the coming 3.2.0 RC4 I've removed the RC3 completely as there is not enough space on the mirrors to have both. Distributed removal from the mirror network is expected for Tuesday/Wednesday. Best regards Marcus

[l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) has been uploaded

2010-01-25 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, the upload of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 to the mirror network was started. The version will install as OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 (build OOO320_m11). As Windows is not fully signed yet, I've started with Linux Intel and Mac OS. The other platforms will follow. Available will be the same

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) has been uploaded

2010-01-25 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, in the meantime the remaining files were uploaded and are distributing already. MD5 checksums: http://download.openoffice.org/next/md5sums/3.2.0rc4_md5sums.txt Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: the upload of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 to the mirror network was started

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) has been uploaded

2010-01-26 Thread Marcus Lange
133bcce51395b3ca2e3f528b9b3e59a1 OOo_3.2.0rc4_20100125_Win32Intel_install_ga.exe 2b36d6a2f3d5c1fad014cdddf2086d2b OOo_3.2.0rc4_20100125_Win32Intel_install_hu.exe We are sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: the upload of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4

[l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) available

2010-01-27 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA team, the OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) is now available on the download website. If you find severe issues within this build please file them to OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker:

[l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [releases] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 4 (build OOO320_m11) has been uploaded

2010-01-28 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, additionally the en-US build was newly uploaded: 3a281ab149201b02cad8d8a387bfa421 OOo_3.2.0rc4_20100125_Win32Intel_install_en-US.exe Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Hi, due to a problem with the signatures of some non-JRE Windows builds we had to resign them (http

[l10n-dev] Cleanup of mirrored installation sets - 3.2.0 RC4

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, to be able to upload the coming 3.2.0 RC5 I've removed the RC4 completely as there is not enough space on the mirrors to have both. Complete distributed removal from the mirror network is expected for Wednesday/Thursday. Best regards Marcus

[l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, the first parts of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 have been uploaded to the mirror network. The version will install as OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 (build OOO320_m12). To get the more important builds first (until the Windows build gets signed), I've started with Linux Intel and Mac OS. The

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_extensions.tar.bz2 561ab60f79b0a25e90b68779227ef707 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_l10n.tar.bz2 f6a738e87adf98ee4a14193f982c97e1 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_system.tar.bz2 aee18235b0db7a26340d038a97c44ba6 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_testautomation.tar.bz2 Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote

[l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Now also complete Linux x86-64 and Windows with JRE was uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, in the meantime also the source tarballs are ready and were already uploaded. 12560444c8a1d2eec4b68fe80472f1c9 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_binfilter.tar.bz2 a6bd39d5d56776eb70151fe0e924b5d7

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Solaris Sparc/x86 and Windows langpacks were uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Now also complete Linux x86-64 and Windows with JRE was uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, in the meantime also the source tarballs are ready and were already uploaded. 12560444c8a1d2eec4b68fe80472f1c9

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-03 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, as last Windows non-JRE was uploaded. That means everything is uploaded. The checksums show the complete set of files: http://download.openoffice.org/next/md5sums/3.2.0rc5_md5sums.txt Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Solaris Sparc/x86 and Windows langpacks were uploaded

[l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) available

2010-02-04 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA team, the OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) is now available on the download website. If you find severe issues within this build please file them to OpenOffice.org's bug tracking system IssueTracker:

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x developer snapshot build DEV300_m71 available

2010-02-05 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300_m71 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: Re: New home for downloading language packs

2010-02-11 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Martin, don't worry, the 3.2.0 directory is already visible on the reference server but not yet the builds itself. I'll try to modify the download websites as soon as possible. Best regards Marcus Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Aha, OK, I figured so, but just wanted to remember, that

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Alexandru, I cannot find ro builds for full installation. Only langpacks were available for RC 1-5. Maybe you have looked on builds provided from someone else in the community? Best regards Marcus Alexandru Szasz wrote: Pe 02.02.2010 15:08, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi, the first parts

Re: [l10n-dev] Missing Asturian. OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release.

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Marcos wrote: Hi Marcos, It seems that the Asturian locale (ast) is not in this Release: http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#en-US although it was in RC4 RC5. http://download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html#untested-lp Am I missing something ? please don't mixup the stable and RC parts

Re: [l10n-dev] Missing Asturian. OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release.

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
as untested now (I didn't see before) :S I don't know how confirm these tests to Approved :O (I can't see any button or link for approved). Can you help, please? Thanks very much! On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Marcos wrote: Hi Marcos, It seems

Re: [l10n-dev] Missing Asturian. OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release.

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
@Per, please can you help? Marcos wrote: Thanks Marcus for your support! I haven't the dropbox :( Do I need create a bug for change my role in QATrack? What must I do? Thanks! On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi Marcos, it should be very simple: 1

Re: [l10n-dev] Missing Asturian. OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release.

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Per Eriksson wrote: Hi Per, Marcus Lange skrev 2010-02-12 12:30: If you have no drop-down-box with some status items, then IMHO you haven't the correct role applied. Maybe Per can apply this to your user acccount as I have no possilibity to do this. You now have the admin rights

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Alexandru Szasz wrote: Pe 12.02.2010 11:36, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi Alexandru, I cannot find ro builds for full installation. Only langpacks were available for RC 1-5. Maybe you have looked on builds provided from someone else in the community? There never were builds for full installation

Re: [l10n-dev] On OSX - 3.2.0 download points to 3.1.1

2010-02-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Martin, when running OSX and opening www.openoffice.org and selecting I want to download OpenOffice.org and its icon, it points to the http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/download/; page and that one after two clicks leads to an obsolete 3.1.1 download. Firstly, OSX

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Marcus Lange
JiHui Choi wrote: Hi, In korean edition rc5, there are some untranslated strings, even though almost strings are translated in Pootle. thanks for looking into this. Would you(anyone) check this please? @Ivo: Please can you investigate? Best regards Marcus

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Decommissioning the Bouncer

2010-02-21 Thread Marcus Lange
Florian Effenberger wrote: John McCreesh wrote on 2010-02-21 16.14: Hi all, AFAIK we have now migrated completely to MirrorBrain. However, the Bouncer is still recording a significant number of downloads (over 38,000 for yesterday). I guess these result from people hardcoding download

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: What is the reason for additional DEV300 builds?

2010-02-22 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, we will add Russian language packs. Then we can cover the codeset with Cyrillic charcaters as it is also used in several other languages. This will start with the next possible milestone. Best regards Marcus fyva wrote: Marcus Lange пишет: I'll check if it is possible to add ru

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300_m72 available

2010-02-26 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300_m72 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

Re: [l10n-dev] Add Latvian language to Sun builds

2010-03-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Viesturs Zarins wrote: Hi Viesturs, After about a year or work the Latvian localization team has finally reached the magical 80% of translated UI and would like to have an official language pack made. thats great news. :-) Currently all the result is in Pootle:

Re: [l10n-dev] Add Latvian language to Sun builds

2010-03-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Rimas Kudelis wrote: 2010.03.12 18:47, Marcus Lange rašė: Viesturs Zarins wrote: Currently all the result is in Pootle: http://pootle2.sunvirtuallab.com/lv/index.html What steps should I make to have Latvian language incorporated into the official builds? Because 3.2.0 is already released new

Re: [l10n-dev] Add Latvian language to Sun builds

2010-03-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Marcus Lange wrote: Viesturs Zarins wrote: Hi Viesturs, After about a year or work the Latvian localization team has finally reached the magical 80% of translated UI and would like to have an official language pack made. thats great news. :-) Currently all the result is in Pootle: http

Re: [l10n-dev] Add Latvian language to Sun builds

2010-03-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, @Ivo, please can you take over here? Thanks Marcus Viesturs Zariņš wrote: Hi Marcus Piektdiena, 2010. gada 12. Marts 19:20:44 Marcus Lange rakstīja: Marcus Lange wrote: Viesturs Zarins wrote: Hi Viesturs, After about a year or work the Latvian localization team has finally

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300_m75 available

2010-03-15 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300_m75 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.2.1 developer snapshot build OOO320_m14 available

2010-03-29 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and L10N teams, developer snapshot build OOO320_m14 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.2.1 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version.

Re: [l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.2.1 developer snapshot build OOO320_m14 available

2010-03-30 Thread Marcus Lange
the updated localization. Well, the question is even simpler - when does QA start with localized builds - when do you expect them to be available? Thanks, m. 2010/3/29 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hello QA and L10N teams, developer snapshot build OOO320_m14 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.2.1 is now

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300_m76 available

2010-04-09 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300_m76 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.2.1 developer snapshot build OOO320m15 available

2010-04-16 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and L10N teams, developer snapshot build OOO320m15 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.2.1 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version.

Re: [l10n-dev] OOO320m16

2010-04-27 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Serg, no, m16 doesn't contain the fixes from the 2nd L10N round. IMHO they will be in CWS ooo321l10n4 and it's planned to integrate them into the next milestone. Best regards Marcus Serg Bormant wrote: OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes. Is this by

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.2.1 developer snapshot build OOO320m16 available

2010-04-27 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA teams, developer snapshot build OOO320m16 which installs as OOo-Dev 3.2.1 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. Please

Re: [l10n-dev] Localization/Translation of OpenOffice.org Environment and Ecosystem

2010-05-04 Thread Marcus Lange
Kazunari Hirano wrote: On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com wrote: Hi Kazunari, http://update.services.openoffice.org/ooo/index_ja.html?cid=920899 I have checked some other localized pages :) http://update.services.openoffice.org/ooo/index_de.html?cid=920899

[l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) available

2010-05-10 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and L10N teams, the OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) is now available on the download website. Please note that currently the Windows language packs are not yet signed, so these files need a bit more time to be available. Furthermore a few languages are

Re: [l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) available

2010-05-11 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Martin, for Linux 32-bit and Windows we have built also install sets without JRE. However, the website is not yet ready to let the choice to the user (you know the JRE check box). I hope to implement this very soon. HTH Marcus Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hi Joost, I followed the

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) available

2010-05-11 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, the Windows langpacks are now available. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: Please note that currently the Windows language packs are not yet signed, so these files need a bit more time to be available. Download website: http://download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html MD5

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [releases] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) available

2010-05-12 Thread Marcus Lange
names get analysed OK but they are not added to the QATrack in the end. I had no problems in this regard with the 3.2.0 builds. Has anything changed? Thanks, m. 2010/5/11 Marcus Lange marcus.la...@sun.com Hi all, the Windows langpacks are now available. Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange

Re: [l10n-dev] QATrack Issue

2010-05-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Rafaella Braconi wrote: Hi Per, can you please update us? When do you think it's solved? Thanks! Rafaella On 12.05.10 09:02, Marcus Lange wrote: Hi Martin, IMHO Per is currently changing something in regards of the filenames as he is the maintainer of QATrack. Best regards Marcus Martin

Re: [l10n-dev] QATrack Issue

2010-05-13 Thread Marcus Lange
/OOo_3.2.1rc1_20100508_MacOS_PPC_install_en-US.dmg Best regards Marcus Per Eriksson wrote: Hi Mechtilde and Marcus, It should be working now. Tested all builds for a language and it all seems to be working. Thanks a lot, Per Eriksson Mechtilde skrev 2010-05-13 11:45: Hello Am 13.05.2010 11:31, schrieb Marcus Lange: Hi

Re: [l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 1 (build OOO320m17) available

2010-05-13 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Jordi, the MacOS PPC builds are located here: http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/macosppc/3.2.1rc1_20100508/ Best regards Marcus Jordi Serratosa wrote: Hi Where can I find the MacOSX PPC packages? In:

Re: [l10n-dev] m78 sdf

2010-05-18 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Martin, IMHO the location for SDF files is always the same: http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/extended/ooomisc/sdf/ If the respective file is not listed, then it is likely not yet available. HTH Best regards Marcus Martin Srebotnjak wrote: Hello, can someone post a link

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300m78 available

2010-05-21 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300m78 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

[l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 2 (build OOO320m18) available on many mirrors

2010-05-28 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and L10N teams, the OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 2 (build OOO320m18) is not yet available from the usual download website but on many mirrors. Please note that currently a few Windows builds are not yet ready, so these files need a bit more time to be available. So, in

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300m79 available

2010-05-31 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300m79 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

Re: [l10n-dev] New: OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 2 (build OOO320m18) available on many mirrors

2010-05-31 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, the usual download website is now also up-to-date: http://download.openoffice.org/all_rc.html Best regards Marcus Marcus Lange wrote: the OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 Release Candidate 2 (build OOO320m18) is not yet available from the usual download website but on many mirrors. Please

[l10n-dev] New: OOo-Dev 3.x Developer Snapshot build DEV300m80 available

2010-06-01 Thread Marcus Lange
Hello QA and NL teams, developer snapshot build DEV300m80 is now available via the download website. The rename of the product name to OOo-Dev allows the installation of the OpenOffice.org snapshot parallel to an OpenOffice.org 'final' (released) version. If you find issues within this

  1   2   >