Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Am 2017-02-13 um 21:36 schrieb Tibor Digana: I am working with Michael on FreeBSD issues. I will try to fix one IT today and I will analyse the logs with next two ITs. Did we change something regarding SITE in Maven 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT ? I was able to tackle the constant failure of

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I am working with Michael on FreeBSD issues. I will try to fix one IT today and I will analyse the logs with next two ITs. Did we change something regarding SITE in Maven 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT ? On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5898532...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #142: SUREFIRE-1330: Import provider code donate...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/142 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #142: SUREFIRE-1330: Import provider code donated by JU...

Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/142 @britter @marcphilipp Done. We are preparing a new release version of Maven and Surefire was examined last days. We still investigate some issues. --- If your project is set up

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Hi Michael, If you will run the build again, this test should not fail. At least I hope so, because it's ok on my side

Re: Build Maven offline

Am 02/13/17 um 17:47 schrieb Guo Yunhe: >> Don't. Don't do the same as done here: >> https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/25/s390x/m/maven-3.3.9-6.fc25.noarch.html >> >> The completely disassembled your tarball and build Maven theirselves. This >> is a non-canoncial build which we are likely

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I view this as a must fix On 13 February 2017 at 10:34, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > I’ve logged the change in precedence as https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/MNG-6172 since this has the potential to break CI builds > which relied on the previous last-one-wins behaviour >

Possible bug in Maven-core

Hi guys, I'm writing here to ask what I have found is a bug or not. I have a project and I want to create an archetype out of it. So I use the following command: mvn archetype:create-from-project -Darchetype.properties=src/main/resources/archetype.properties It used to work fine with

Re: Build Maven offline

> Don't. Don't do the same as done here: > https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/25/s390x/m/maven-3.3.9-6.fc25.noarch.html > > The completely disassembled your tarball and build Maven theirselves. This is > a non-canoncial build which we are likely not going to support! The > modifications

Build Maven offline

Hi, I am a contributor of openSUSE Linux. I am packaging maven package. Building maven from source requires internet connection and downloads extra packages. However, the openSUSE build server doesn't allow any downloads from internet while building. So I want to ask if I can build maven

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I will push branch SUREFIRE-1322 which has a fix for freebsd. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > I am currently running a patched version of Maven with the offensive > commit reverted against Surefire master on FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE. I'll see > wether

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I am currently running a patched version of Maven with the offensive commit reverted against Surefire master on FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE. I'll see wether this is the cause in an hour or so. Michael > I’ve logged the change in precedence as > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6172 since

Re: Build Maven offline

> Hi, I am a contributor of openSUSE Linux. I am packaging maven package. > > Building maven from source requires internet connection and downloads extra > packages. However, the openSUSE build server doesn't allow any downloads from > internet while building. So I want to ask if I can build

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Michael, can you please connect to IRC mvn dev? I would like to discuss regarding FreeBSD. Thx On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > I am currently running a patched version of Maven with the offensive > commit reverted against Surefire master on FreeBSD

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

The HEAD in Surefire has a Jira fix 1322 which is using the same IT which failed on FreeBSD. So I simply included FreeBSD fix in the test Surefire141PluggableProvidersIT. I hope you will be happy with that. The only last IT which fails and I did not have time to investigate is

Re: Build Maven offline

Am 2017-02-13 um 17:47 schrieb Guo Yunhe: Don't. Don't do the same as done here: https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/25/s390x/m/maven-3.3.9-6.fc25.noarch.html The completely disassembled your tarball and build Maven theirselves. This is a non-canoncial build which we are likely not going

Re: Build Maven offline

Then don't include it in the distro. Packaging non-standard, possibly broken, versions in distros is not doing anyone any favors. Users are better off just downloading for themselves. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Guo Yunhe wrote: >> Don't. Don't do the same as done

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I’ve logged the change in precedence as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6172 since this has the potential to break CI builds which relied on the previous last-one-wins behaviour On Monday, 13 February 2017 at 06:54, Tibor Digana wrote: > Exactly this is the problem - forkMode and

Re: Possible bug in Maven-core

Hi Peter, I would consider this as a Maven Archetype issue. Regarding the properties, the MavenSession has a deprecated method getExecutionProperties(), which is split up into getSystemProperties() and getUserProperties(). When using the Invoker it doesn't make sense to add