Thanks Nathan
On 12/13/06, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what it's worth, I've been working my way through getting the
latest Xerces artifacts uploaded, but new XML commons, resolver, and
the Xalan serializer need to be uploaded as well. I'm working through
all the various POMs and
Hi all,
According to the docs, maven1 supported NTLM proxies. I cannot find
anything definitive to say whether NTLM proxies are supported in maven2
though.
In our case the ISA proxy also supports basic auth, but this also doesn't
work - I suspect the underlying proxy code implementation in maven
On 12/13/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
According to the docs, maven1 supported NTLM proxies. I cannot find
anything definitive to say whether NTLM proxies are supported in maven2
though.
In our case the ISA proxy also supports basic auth, but this also doesn't
work - I
After browsing thru the conversation relating to Maven and Fedora I thought I
would put in the Gentoo Linux's perspective.
Firstly just as a background to gentoo.
Gentoo is a source based linux distro in which packages are compiled within a
highly structured bash script (ebuild). These
Hi,
I encountered the following issue using 'scm:checkin' command.
The environment is Windows. SCM CVS provider version is 1.0-beta-4.
The 'scm:checkin' is translated in a cvs command, displayed on standard
output which is the following:
[DEBUG] Configuring mojo
On 12/13/06, Alistair Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a ebuild is executed in a sandbox all attempts to access directories like
~/.mvn will result in the build failing majorly. There is therefore no
practicial way that we (Gentoo) can implement a maven repository that is
common and available
In addition, Java 1.4+ support some NTLM servers OOTB by setting the
correct system properties. This was one of the main reasons we never
bothered requiring httpclient to support NTLM though we could
optionally reintroduce it if there were demand. This is the first
time I recall hearing
or use --settings to provide alternate configuration.
We've been over the gentoo discussion before - you might like to
search the archives, or get in touch with the java gentoo folks that
brought it up. As a non-user, I'm basically in the same boat as with
Fedora (though I'm a little more
On 12/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, Java 1.4+ support some NTLM servers OOTB by setting the
correct system properties. This was one of the main reasons we never
bothered requiring httpclient to support NTLM though we could
optionally reintroduce it if there were
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html
Barrie Treloar a écrit :
On 12/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, Java 1.4+ support some NTLM servers OOTB by setting the
correct system properties. This was one of the main reasons we never
bothered requiring
google says...
http.auth.ntlm.domain
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/net/properties.html
Could be worth exposing this via the settings into the lightweight
wagon, and passing the equivalent to the httpclient wagon via it's
authenticators.
- Brett
On 13/12/2006, at 9:56 PM,
Barrie Treloar [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006 01:47:02:
Running mvn in debug mode so I can attach eclipse to the running
instance.
How do you do that?
Regards,
--
Aaron Digulla
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
I don't see that there is a consistent view yet on this. It would be
nice to get to a conclusion on whether the Maven community would like to
work with the downstream distros teams so that we can provide a
consistent and good experience. Is there any more information that is
needed to get to
Carl Trieloff wrote:
I don't see that there is a consistent view yet on this. It would be
nice to get to a conclusion on whether the Maven community would like
to work with the downstream distros teams so that we can provide a
consistent and good experience. Is there any more information
On 13 Dec 06, at 10:26 AM 13 Dec 06, Carl Trieloff wrote:
I don't see that there is a consistent view yet on this. It would
be nice to get to a conclusion on whether the Maven community would
like to work with the downstream distros teams so that we can
provide a consistent and good
oh, yeah. Sorry about that, wasn't intentional... i'll edit my comment
in there, thanks
Brett Porter wrote:
Edwin,
You should list who submitted the fix in the comment.
- Brett
On 11/12/2006, at 7:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: epunzalan
Date: Mon Dec 11 00:30:32 2006
New
Current releases performed...
maven-javadoc-plugin - 2.2
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/2.2/
maven-source-plugin - 2.0.2
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:16 pm, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On 12/13/06, Alistair Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a ebuild is executed in a sandbox all attempts to access directories
like ~/.mvn will result in the build failing majorly. There is therefore
no practicial way that we
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mykel Alvis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 12, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: Issue with lightweight http plugin (1.0-alpha-6 and 1.0-beta-1)
To: MavenWagonUsers wagon-users@maven.apache.org
On a windows machine, authenticated on an NT domain, the proxy username
I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for
preparing views for the webapp?
Cheers,
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
anyone?
On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be
partially used. Does anyone know
On 12/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
google says...
http.auth.ntlm.domain
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/net/properties.html
Could be worth exposing this via the settings into the lightweight
wagon, and passing the equivalent to the httpclient wagon via it's
Oops. Let me clarify. I did NOT ask about the 1.5 ntlm properties. I asked
about NTLM authentication. Sorry.
On 12/13/06, Mykel Alvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/13/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
google says...
http.auth.ntlm.domain
I just noticed this guy:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/archetypes/maven-
archetype-plugin/
I don't recall this archetype being added (and since they weren't
listed out in the vote never noticed). Isn't this name a bit
confusing in relation to the actual archetype plugin?
On 14/12/2006, at 2:57 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
- Using an installation layout that is consistent with our current
setup
I think what you are actually asking for is one that is consistent
with our documented setup. I think it's still possible to relocate
the binaries since the only
Announcements?
Given the site plugin hasn't been released, let's reset on that and
do it properly. ie:
- finish code first
- vote on svn revision
- vote must be at least 72 hours, so I get to both a) sleep and b)
vote, not just one :)
- release and announce
Brett
On 14/12/2006, at 4:54
On 13 Dec 06, at 4:38 PM 13 Dec 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Announcements?
Given the site plugin hasn't been released, let's reset on that and
do it properly. ie:
- finish code first
- vote on svn revision
We can provide the provision but the process will be voting on the
staged release.
On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barrie Treloar [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 13.12.2006 01:47:02:
Running mvn in debug mode so I can attach eclipse to the running
instance.
How do you do that?
Copy your mvn script to something like mvn-debug.{bat|.sh}
Then find the
If you haven't already filed a JIRA, I suggest doing that.
Thanks,
Brett
On 14/12/2006, at 6:41 AM, Mykel Alvis wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mykel Alvis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 12, 2006 4:06 PM
Subject: Issue with lightweight http plugin (1.0-alpha-6 and 1.0-
yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and
project group and projects bits like name, group, etc..
so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume
jesse
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 13:18 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
On 11/12/2006, at 11:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have no problems with an RPM provided it was contained in one
directory like we have now our documentation being applicable.
Something that split up all over the place, or
On 14/12/2006, at 9:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can provide the provision but the process will be voting on the
staged release. By the time Kenney fixes the site plugin this will
be done.
Yep, well the staged release comes from a particular svn rev, so even
better.
John T is
Hi,
I have read Brett's reply to this message. Just to add some more info to
the points:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:57 -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Dec 06, at 10:26 AM 13 Dec 06, Carl Trieloff wrote:
I don't see that there is a consistent view yet on this. It would
be nice to get
Hi Jesse,
Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
domain entities directly in the view?
I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only
exposes that required stuff for view
On 13 Dec 06, at 5:57 PM 13 Dec 06, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Hi,
I have read Brett's reply to this message. Just to add some more
info to
the points:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:57 -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Dec 06, at 10:26 AM 13 Dec 06, Carl Trieloff wrote:
I don't see that there is
On 13 Dec 06, at 5:56 PM 13 Dec 06, Brett Porter wrote:
On 14/12/2006, at 9:26 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can provide the provision but the process will be voting on the
staged release. By the time Kenney fixes the site plugin this will
be done.
Yep, well the staged release comes
no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
domain entities
did you find what was causing it? :-)
Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i remember correct from what I saw in the m-e-p sources last week,
maven-eclipse-plugin-test is created by the Plugin unit tests and then
installed to a *test* repo local to the
This is just a synopsis email about the future of the release process.
Disclaimer: I am not attempting to set policy, just to get discussion
going,
document it, and work towards the ideal toolchain that
make the
future of apache releases smooth, consistent, and
6) All source files in the sources.jar files will contain the following
header.
---(snip)---
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
distributed with this work for additional
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 18:30 -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Dec 06, at 5:57 PM 13 Dec 06, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Hi,
I have read Brett's reply to this message. Just to add some more
info to
the points:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:57 -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Dec 06, at
On 12/14/06, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did you find what was causing it? :-)
Not yet.
I think the problem is in ProjectTool.manglePomForTesting
but I need to do more investigating.
I am looking into why internal_plugins dont work and this is higher
priority for me at the
On 13 Dec 06, at 7:15 PM 13 Dec 06, Deepak Bhole wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 18:30 -0500, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Dec 06, at 5:57 PM 13 Dec 06, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Hi,
I have read Brett's reply to this message. Just to add some more
info to
the points:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:57
Hi,
The Geronimo folks need a release of the XMLBeans plugins, could
someone help me look at the issues and see if the issues for 2.0.1
can be pushed off to a 2.0.2 or if the can be cleared up quickly.
Thanks,
Jason.
-
wrong list?
On 14/12/2006, at 12:26 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The Geronimo folks need a release of the XMLBeans plugins, could
someone help me look at the issues and see if the issues for 2.0.1
can be pushed off to a 2.0.2 or if the can be cleared up quickly.
Thanks,
Jason.
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
This is just a synopsis email about the future of the release process.
Disclaimer: I am not attempting to set policy, just to get discussion
going,
document it, and work towards the ideal toolchain that
make the
future of apache releases
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (38 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MEV-474 Hibernate Annotations 3.2.1ga is not deployed, though it was
released, and hibernate core 3.2.1ga is released
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (16 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MAVENUPLOAD-1242JFreeChart 1.0.3
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1242
MAVENUPLOAD-1264UrlRewriteFilter 2.6
It looks like the -Preporting flag wasn't used when deploying the sites.
Some of the reports might not be missed, but apparently this also
precludes the goal pages (ex:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/bundle-moj
o.html). I redeployed all the sites listed below so they
Thanks for a great e-mail Joakim. I wanted to chime in with my two
cents...
(I've been off the radar for a couple of months while waiting for
permission to sign my ICLA; it's in now, and I'm now back to paying more
careful attention to this process... forgive me if some of this has
already
Hi Dan,
I think what you are describing is what you do at your work place,
and I think it might be good if you could give us a full description
of your system for folks here to help them understand exactly what it
is you're talking about. I probably know a little more about it then
most
50 matches
Mail list logo
