Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

completely idle. But why are there two streampumper threads in > > the main process ? > > > > We'll continue in the jira. I'm definitely -1 on this release until we > > can sort this out. > > > > Kristian > > > > > > 2015-10-08 18:54 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenv

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

Hi, I am cancelling the first Vote. I will start another Vote. -- Cheers Tibor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils 3.0.0 (Take 2)

here's mine +1 non-binding On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > Note: This is a Maven 3.0 / JDK 6 release > > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12333677 > > There are several

Re: surefire 2.19 hangs

op.com/unlocker/ > > Maybe there are others tools nowadays … > > The most important is to see which process is locking the files you are > > trying to delete to understand why it didn’t unlock them > > > > > > > On 08 Oct 2015, at 16:53, Tibor Digana <[hidden e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

/usr/share/maven > Java version: 1.6.0_65, vendor: Apple Inc. > Java home: /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman > OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.8.5", arch: "x86_64", family:

Apache infrastructure and java6; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-85

a test -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Apache-infrastructure-and-java6-https-issues-apache-org-jira-browse-BUILDS-85-tp5839631p5839637.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

Nice project indeed. Maybe only JRE has the benefit from multi-version JAR, but I cannot imaging this feature in ordinal projects. Who has benefit from writing the code three times if API of module matters. Maybe performance will be different only. On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: Another JIRA cleanup

The link is not reachable. Can you fix it? The requested filter doesn't exist or is private. On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi folks, > > some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some time > ago. I'd like to reperform that

Re: HEADS-UP: maven.apache.org redirection oddity

What about to add slash '/' at the end of URL as we did in the enforcer plugin and surefire project? Should be applied to all plugins at once? On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5843405...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, that's a limitation I already

HEADS UP: SNAPSHOT Testing in pre-release

Hi All Maven Committers, I would like to make sure that our plugins are stable right before cutting release. Please check it out with these maven plugins in your projects. Try to test filters (-Dtest=%regex[], includes/excludes), JVM forks, test reports, compare build time, stability, total

Re: Full migration to Git

Jason, is it possible to have regular repo https://github.com/apache/maven-shared without mirroring from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/ ? If a contributor in GitHub creates a new PR, then I won't migrate it to SVN. Nevertheless I am still fine to have mirror in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

We can release Version 0.10 but the PMC has to then prepare a new milestone in Jira and migrate these three issues we solved in 0.9. @Kristian Shall we skip the tests on Windows? This would be the 4th issues to fix. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

s: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 > sec - > > in org.apache.maven.shared.utils.XmlStreamReaderTest > > > > Results : > > > > Failed tests: > > DirectoryScannerTest.followSymlinks:179 null > > FileUtilsTest.copyFileThatIsSymlink:433 null > >

build park slows down

Hello guys, Let's discuss build park issues. The build [1] permanently fails on performance tests because the JVM is blocked by something. After a segmentation fault, happened 3 days ago, on JVM Java 7 the machine Windows1 is already very slow [2]. It looks like something eats the CPU. Our

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12332813 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

er/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5845058=0>>: > > > Hi Tibor, > > > > On 9/16/15 9:40 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: > >> > >> We can release Version 0.10 but the PMC has to then prepare a new > >> milestone > >> in Jira and migrate these three issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

> > And drop the old release repository and create a new one..of course you > need to delete the old SVN Tag and create a new one...that's it... > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > On 9/17/15 10:07 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: > > > Kristian, thank you for yo

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Hi , A new Vote went out. Thx. Tibor On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > According to the -1 vote I am cancelling the first vote. > I will start another Vote in a while. > > Cheers > Tibor >

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Hi, According to the -1 vote I am cancelling the first vote. I will start another Vote in a while. Cheers Tibor

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9 - TAKE 2

Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12332813 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9 - TAKE 2

egards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 22:12:04 Tibor Digana a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 4 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922 > > rsion=12332813 > > > > There are sti

Re: [GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: [Surefire-1144] Time for testsuite on...

@lamyaa Try to print exec time in the XmlReporterRunTimeIT for Test1: System.out.println( report.getTimeElapsed() ) Because of two methods are concurrent and because of the runorder is not applicable in the first build run, Test1 runs all three methods within 0.8 sec. Each next run would complete

Re: maven-shared-utils

@Karl off-topic but still related to maven-shared-utils, please see my question https://github.com/apache/maven-shared/commit/29737d2cc1a168905705c81dcd3e213091efc551 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5846713...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > >

ready for cutting Surefire release version 2.19

Hello guys, This is just forwarded email from our private discussion. Herve remarked with good idea that this might be worth information for everyone in dev@. ... I have completed all issues in surefire 2.19. If you have any wishes in the release, I can postpone it. btw, in 2014 we planned an

ApacheCON

Geronimo container Hi Apache geeks, I hope you had good trip home. What would you say to an idea to summarize our visions with Maven? We had a good time to speak about it, and since the talk is always better than a slow chat we should maybe let the community be informed. Basically these were

ApacheCON

Hi Apache geeks, I hope you had good trip home. What would you say to an idea to summarize our visions with Maven? We had a good time to speak about it, and since the talk is always better than a slow chat we should maybe let the community be informed. Basically these were the topics: + Maven

Re: Releasing the assembly plugin

@Benson Maybe no objections if you mention details of moving repo from svn / to github, etc. Do you mean that assembly will be fully git based in [1] which means I will be able to directly push to GitHub and the pull-requests as well? [1]

Re: SLF4J related issues

How is the change working on CI? Is not there any escape codes around every line? I guess jansi has or needs JNI lib or should be added for Win. Working on all platforms? On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Hi all, > > After our exchanges this week

Re: maven-shared-utils

I do not have explanation for that. What SVN history says? Who committed the change in POM? On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > just a question on understanding... > > Can someone explain me why maven-shared-utils produces a shaded artifact >

Re: maven-shared-utils 3.0.0 preparation for Release

Yeah it's good to run straight ahead of 3.0 and jdk6. Although Robert will branch last tag, I hope he does not have bottleneck on it but anyway better to have 3.0 than nothing. I have only problem with the dependency maven-core which was tools having scope=provided. Very strict enforcer may fail

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Eclipse Plugin / Donation to Mojohaus

+1 I understand Rotert's problem with this plugin. I would personally move it away from Apache repo in GitHub because I think we should not dedicate our spare time to maintain it. The only problem is who will have rights to commit into it, or let the contributors to push pull requests like it is

Re: Can compiler-plugin skip sniffer--plugin if "Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date"

ant to have a look at > io.takari.incrementalbuild library that provides some/most of the common > resource modification tracking plumbing. > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015, at 03:01 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > > > Good point and how to restore the stat

Can compiler-plugin skip sniffer--plugin if "Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date"

I want to speed up the build and skip sniffer-plugin if "Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date". Do you think that maven-compiler-plugin can do it. For instance to set POM $property if incremental compiler says "Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date". Cheers Tibor

Re: maven-shared-utils

Dennis, is there any issue with incompatibility between versions of Apache Commons? If there is no such, then maybe normal dependency inheritance would be useful. On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > IIRC maven-shared-utils uses a bunch of Apache

Re: Can compiler-plugin skip sniffer--plugin if "Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date"

l-sniffer. If there are no classes to > > compile, but previous run had an issue found by animal sniffer, it must > still fail either by rerunning animal-sniffer or displaying previous > result. > > Robert > > Op Sun, 04 Oct 2015 20:43:37 +0200 schreef Tibor Digana > <[hidden email

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

Hi, We solved 50 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12331679 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Staging repo:

Does Maven kill itself after CRTL+C ?

Hi, After analysing Maven code I could find the place where the Maven kills itself after CTRL+C. Obviously my shutdown hook in surefire is called randomly, so I want to know if we call java.lang.Runtime#halt(). Do you know it how we exit Maven process? Cheers Tibor

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9 - TAKE 2

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Kristian Rosenvold I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Parent POM version 27

+1 (non binding) On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n584554...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 13 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250=12329010 > > Changes since the last release: > >

[ANN] Apache Maven Shared Utils 0.9 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Shared Utils, version 0.9. The release contains a number of bug fixes. https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-shared-utils/ You should specify the version in your project's dependencies configuration:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9 - TAKE 2

Hello guys, We are still missing one Vote. We are closing the Vote at 10:12 PM CET. -- Cheers Tibor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: ApacheCon EU 2015, Budapest

I have booked the room in conference's hotel, so anybody will find me there easily. I arrive to Budabest by train at 7pm so we can go to a pub and I am leaving on Saturday 12am. I will just send you my phone No. On 9/19/15, Robert Scholte wrote: > (I'll just copy the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

3.0.5 (JDK 6), unfortunately i have found an issue in > the > >>> integration test which has failedI have attached the failing > >>> integration-test-result output > >>> > >>> This is my environment: > >>> A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

af9602da; >> 2013-02-19 14:51:28+0100) >> Maven home: /usr/share/maven >> Java version: 1.6.0_65, vendor: Apple Inc. >> Java home: >> /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman >> O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19

ed. We sell the libs and not an internal environment. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > Now I remember the reason why 3.0.5. > We have different order of artifacts in main and test code. > This means we need to have 3.0.5 to resolve other

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Common Artifact Filters Version 3.0.0

+1: from me On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5853570...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The vote has passed with the following result: > > +1 : Karl Heinz Marbaise, Robert Scholte, Michael Osipov > > PMC quorum: reached > > I will promote the

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

JUnit 4 End Of Life I have a strong reason to use Java 8 in Surefire project. For more information read this https://github.com/junit-team/junit-lambda/issues/31 Cheers Tibor On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5854925...@n5.nabble.com> wrote

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1207

Hi, This email was sent to @juherr (developer at TestNG) and maven development group in ASF. Can we filter out Test class using excluded groups right without use of TestNG or JUnit instance? See the Jira [1]. For instance if we access annotations @Test(groups) in TestNG classes or @Category in

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

i agree with stephenc that major version change = API change. >> the longer we put off updating the baseline JDK *in core* the worse the pain will be in 2-3 years for us when developing and maintaining our plugins We can always open a Vote but then some users may loose a fix been important for

Re: to delete windows build ?

plugin was leaking like a sieve, and should now be fully > > >> > watertight. There seems to be a few bits of silly code that I'd > just > > >> > like > > >> > to remove, since the root cause in all likelyhood is fixed: > > >> > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.6

+1 On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317621=12332973 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: svn commit: r1719038 - /maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml

@Christian Schulte Welcome to ASF family. Enjoy it! On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Andreas Gudian [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5854370...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Welcome, Christian! Great to have you with us! > > > Am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise : > > > Hi

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

Do you want to use modulepath for dependencies -modulepath ../child2/target/classes, ../child3/target/classes instead of aggregating -classpath in javac? On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > I've been able to locally *package* a subset of the

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

n Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote: > Op Sun, 03 Jan 2016 22:55:48 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana < > tibor.dig...@googlemail.com>: > > Do you want to use modulepath for dependencies >> -modulepath ../child2/target/classes

Re: [Jigsaw] classpaths and modulepaths

atch the videos of the sessions of > JavaOne[1] > This gave me a good picture of what jigsaw is and what it is not. > > Robert > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/j1/ > > > Op Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:25:54 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana < > tibor.dig...@googlemail.co

Re: Log4j Warning

Hi Arnaud, Do you plan a Release Version to merge this branch o master in Maven? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Arnaud Héritier [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5857870...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Just because only 2.4 was available when I updated this feature branch few > months ago. > > Le mardi 5

End Of Life Apache Maven 2.x

Hi devs, Do we have CMS for this page? http://maven.apache.org/maven-2.x-eol.html I should update plugin version to the latest Maven 2 compatible. -- Cheers Tibor

Re: Log4j Warning

den email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5857980=0>> wrote: > > > -1 > > > > Do not merge this branch. > > > > > On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:05 AM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5857980=1>> wrote:

Re: to delete windows build ?

e no other > > leaks in the code that was being tested. > > > > K > > > > 2015-12-17 17:04 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org>: > > > Now the Windows build works [1] [2]. > > > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-suref

migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

I missing this import in MOJO after migrating plugin to 3.0 import org.apache.maven.shared.artifact.resolve.ArtifactResolver; The doc [1] says that maven-artifact-transfer should be used but it does not have yet a release version, or? org.apache.maven.shared maven-artifact-transfer

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

P=NP maven-compat made the trick org.apache.maven maven-compat On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5858124...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > I missing this import in MOJO after migrating plugin to 3.0 >

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

or reference, that's what I'm trying to do: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-203 > > Thanks for any pointers, > Andreas > > > 2016-01-07 20:33 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com>: > > > Now I removed maven-compat completely.

NoSuchMethodError maven-plugin-testing-harness:3.0.0

I am migrating plugin to 3.0.0 and I have a problem with a test because it fails due to maven-plugin-testing-harness:3.0.0 cannot call a method: setClassPathScanning(Ljava/lang/String;)Lorg/codehaus/plexus/ContainerConfiguration; In maven-plugin-testing-harness' code the method

Re: NoSuchMethodError maven-plugin-testing-harness:3.0.0

thing is a mess would be an > understatement ;-) > > On 7 January 2016 at 12:40, Tibor Digana <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node=5858236=0>> > wrote: > > > I am migrating plugin to 3.0.0 and I have a problem with a test > > because it fa

Re: NoSuchMethodError maven-plugin-testing-harness:3.0.0

of the new ones. > > That said I would have assumed the maven-plugin-testing-harness would > fully isolate the runtime being tested from the harness so you wouldn’t > need to do this. > > PS. which plugin are you migrating? > > On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 12:40, Tibor Digana

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1

Hi, I am cancelling the first vote due to prolonged execution time of Maven build 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT from 1:17 to 1:27 s. I will start another Vote in a while. On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > /jira-report.html is empty

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1

Hi, I am cancelling the first vote due to prolonged execution time of Maven build 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT from 1:17 to 1:27 s. I will start another Vote in a while. Cheers Tibor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

ire-shadefire:jar:2.19.1 > 2) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-booter:jar:2.12.4 > > >org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.19.1 > > from the specified remote repositories: >nexus (http://localhost:8081/nexus/content/groups/public, > releases

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

Hi, We solved 17 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12333959 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Staging repo:

Re: [Jigsaw] Apache Maven status update

Is't strange that Sun/Oracle decided now to change to New Version String-Scheme however Java SE 1.5 was called Java SE 5 already 11 years ago. http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223 I think maven-invoker-plugin or users may have the same problem like pluxus-archiver. invoker.properties

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

Maven build is pretty fast and stable, so +1: from me On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 17 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12333959 > > There a

Re: [Jigsaw] Fwd: Specifying module paths

a. Regarding execution of forked JVM in Surefire it has nothing to do with javac, nothing but java. Regarding building forked jar, then yes this may have an impact because we create jar file which contains manifetst having Class-Path. b. Is the classpath in manifest going to be deprecated or

Re: [Jigsaw] Fwd: Specifying module paths

> path" would need to support this." I assumed this also means java.exe. The > ticket also states they want to get away from "long command lines". Based > on these remarks, it should be affecting forking too. > On Jan 9, 2016 10:57 AM, "Tibor Digana"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digana, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé BOUTEMY 0 : none -1 : none. PMC quorum: accomplished. On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 17 issues: > > http

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1 - TAKE 2

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Tibor Digana, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé BOUTEMY The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digana, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Hervé BOUTEMY 0 : none -1 : none. PMC quorum: accomplished. I will promote the artifacts

[ANN] Apache Maven Surefire Plugin 2.19.1 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.19.1 The release contains 17 bug fixes. Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports and bug fixes. Thank you and keep them coming!

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Tibor, >>> >>> so this is not how it should be done. >>> Compat contains classes which Maven2 classes which have been replaced by >>> Maven3 or are not used anymore. >>> Only plugins which need to stay c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

`+1 On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5858080...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12333879 > > There are still a couple of iss

Re: migrating Surefire to 3.0-RC1

4858e5e#diff-384c9234a411cc2c48bfb9c8731993b7 > > For reference, that's what I'm trying to do: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-203 > > Thanks for any pointers, > Andreas > > > 2016-01-07 20:33 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana <[hidden email] > <http:///user

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.3

Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12333879 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+MSHADE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Staging repo:

Re: Another yearly bug squash

In Surefire I already made a cleanup. Those open ones are still valid. Thx. On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to do another bug squash like a did last year. > We currently have 132 unresolved bugs which haven't been updated for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: File Management Version 3.0.0

+1 On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5856227...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 9 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20file-management-3.0.0 > > There are still a

Re: Retiring Maven Skins

+1 no objections to: Retire: Maven Application Skin, Maven Classic Skin, Maven Stylus Skin Active: Maven Default Skin, Maven Fluido Skin On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen-2 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5856095...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > +1 > > Regards > Mirko > -- > Sent from

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Application Skin, Maven Classic Skin, Maven Stylus Skin

Oliver, it's not a pressure. Such activities have already started, like retiring Maven 2, old parallel Maven 3 codelines, Eclipse plugin. I guess this is very important because we would only concentrate on one goal, for instance plugins @Java 1.6 and Maven 4. Makes sense? Of course we are

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1

Hi, We solved 16 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12333959 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC Staging repo:

Re: Question...concerning classifier

Hm, classifiers in plugins, not really used at all. Dependencies yes. I guess classifier is more overhead and evil than benefit. I remember Maven docu talked about classifier jdk1.5 as an example and maybe environment specifics, but I guess it was the only examples in the tutorial. Regarding valid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1

not understand the influence of [1] so anybody can have a look too and help me with investigating this issue. Maybe it's a kind of JDK issue but I am not totally sure. [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/2338a582cb47931b0ee544d32add3a27ce1b971c On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Tibor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Shared IO Version 3.0.0

+1 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5855847...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > here is my +1 > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 12/20/15 2:05 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 5 issues: > > >

Re: .jar is installed as .war

@Oliver What is your use case? I want to know why you want to split classes/resources and web content. Is not it more clean solution to have multi-module project where jar module would contain Java files+resources and war module dependent on jar artifact? On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Oliver

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.19.1

ids and names as in Codehaus where yet the reporting was working fine. Herve, do you have any idea why this has happened? Thx Tibor On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote: > I think I will postpone the Vote. This Version is about removing

Re: Maven Source Plugin 3.0.0 Question

..but I don't understand why you want to have the descriptor in sources jar? Is the plugin buggy or something or it is just arbitrary some reason found for a release? On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > at the moment the maven-source-plugin

Re: Maven Source Plugin 3.0.0 Question

<micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2015-11-28 um 21:36 schrieb Tibor Digana: > >> ..but I don't understand why you want to have the descriptor in sources >> jar? >> Is the plugin buggy or something or it is just arbitrary some reason found >> for a release? >> >

Re: Why can't dependency plugin "see" statics /and staticimports

AFAIK javac must keeps calling static field Test2.AZAZ. But the runtime compiler (JustInTime compiler JIT) may or may not compile the field to constant and inline private methods. That's the reason why Java Reflection won't see any changes on the field if you call setAccessible(true) and rewrite

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

As I spoke with Andreas and Kristian about my ideas now I am going to forward this email to Maven mailinglist. I can see the opportunity of Java 8 but I don't say that all artifacts must be necessarily compiled with Java8. I can imaging few of them which make sense. This is the email and you can

Re: Switching Maven HEAD to 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT

7" line... > oh well... we might have to argue this one out > > On 29 November 2015 at 23:14, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > w00t new minor and we get to drop Java 7 > > > > > > On Sunday 29 November 2015, Tibor Di

Re: Switching Maven HEAD to 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT

+1: go for it On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Now that Maven 3.3.9 is out and seems pretty stable, any objection to > switch > to 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT? > > I want to merge MNG-5878 new feature... > > Regards, > > Hervé > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Component: Maven Mapping Version 3.0.0

+1 sha1 checksum ok; MSHARED-449 LGTM On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5852361...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le dimanche 15 novembre 2015 13:10:40 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Note: This is a Maven 3.0 / JDK

Re: Java 9 - Java Modules aka Jigsaw

l APIs[1] > > thanks, > Robert > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/260 > > Op Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:48:42 +0100 schreef Tibor Digana < > tibordig...@apache.org>: > > > Our plugins are dependent on internal Sun JDK packages. >> This is the list of plugins:Java

Re: Java 9 - Java Modules aka Jigsaw

ava 8 has a java.util.Base64 class so that one is easy. > > Gary > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Our plugins are dependent on internal Sun JDK packages. > > This is the list of plugins:Java classes and JDK c

Re: to delete windows build ?

ade plugin was leaking like a sieve, and should now be fully > >> > watertight. There seems to be a few bits of silly code that I'd just > like > >> > to remove, since the root cause in all likelyhood is fixed: > >> > > >> > For insta

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >