Hi,
right - there are no entries in the manifest. they will be generated for the
separated osgi bundle/s during the build (based on the build config).
Jep! That was the idea in the first place (look at the branch and
you'll see no bundle plugin in myfaces-api or myfaces-impl, but in
great! thx jakob mark!
+1!
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/7/11 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi,
right - there are no entries in the
+1
Am 11.07.11 11:39, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
great! thx jakob mark!
+1!
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/7/11 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi,
1. All classes in org.apache.myfaces.spi.
I did not change anything here, just internal imports (from *.spi.impl
to *.spi.util)!
2. All classes that has to be with LifecycleProvider (@PostConstruct
annotation). Such classes should be on spi package, but note spi work
started after 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063327#comment-13063327
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-1013:
---
Thanks, for the feedback. I expect the
Dialog duplicate id
---
Key: TRINIDAD-2113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2113
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Environment:
+1
I've deployed the demo to http://irian.biz/tobago-example-demo/
Regards
Udo
Am 10.07.11 15:42, schrieb Mark Struberg:
+1
Btw, you could upgrade to the newest myfaces-parent.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 7/9/11, Bernd Bohmannbernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
From: Bernd
+1
I've deployed the demo to http://irian.biz/tobago-example-demo-trunk/
Regards
Udo
Am 10.07.11 15:54, schrieb Mark Struberg:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 7/10/11, Bernd Bohmannbernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
From: Bernd Bohmannbernd.bohm...@atanion.com
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tobago
Summary of proposed changes for ErrorPage:
In header:
- viewId,
- location of facelet in filesystem
- PhaseId
In body:
- info about component (that triggered the problem)
- EL expression being evaluated, it's location, name of attribute/value
pair
- caused by: output first line of StackTrace
Hi,
in the last few weeks I've been working on the GSOC project for Apache
Myfaces (see http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/GSoC2011_AutomatedTests)
If you are curious you can check out the current source from
http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/manila/
What's working:
* starting tests in different
Hi
2011/7/11 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
1. All classes in org.apache.myfaces.spi.
I did not change anything here, just internal imports (from *.spi.impl
to *.spi.util)!
It is questionable to create .spi.util. After all, it is not supposed
that package be consumed by
hi jan,
sounds great - thx for the update!
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/7/11 Jan Zarnikov jan.zarni...@gmail.com
Hi,
in the last few weeks I've been
Hi,
No, sorry Leo, they are not enough. Frankly, I don't understand why
you are blocking this solution. It is easy, it does not break anything
(if we do not change the package names), it is a lot more clean and we
can get rid of the shaded-impl module. If we don't do this now, we
will maybe have
Hi Jan,
Yes, thanks a lot for the update on your project!
Regards,
Jakob
2011/7/11 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi jan,
sounds great - thx for the update!
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and
Hi
I'll be clear and direct. What makes statements true or false are the
reasons behind it. Until this moment, you are not question the reasons
behind the reasoning proposed.
To be short, my argumentation is we can't change for now:
1. Everything inside org.apache.myfaces.spi
2.
Hi
Please don't commit the changes until I do a final review. That will
take some time, so please be patient, there are other issues on core
right now that we need to solve too. Anyway we can't commit the code
without a release of javadoc plugin.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/7/11 Jakob Korherr
Hi,
+1
Regards,
Volker
2011/7/11 Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de:
+1
I've deployed the demo to http://irian.biz/tobago-example-demo/
Regards
Udo
Am 10.07.11 15:42, schrieb Mark Struberg:
+1
Btw, you could upgrade to the newest myfaces-parent.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On
Hi,
+1
Regards,
Volker
2011/7/11 Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de:
+1
I've deployed the demo to http://irian.biz/tobago-example-demo-trunk/
Regards
Udo
Am 10.07.11 15:54, schrieb Mark Struberg:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 7/10/11, Bernd
Hi
Thanks to all community members who vote.
Here are the results
1. No votes
2. 5 votes (Martin Marinschek, Jakob Korherr, Gerhard Petracek, Rudy
de Busscher, Jan Kees Van Andel)
3. 7 votes (Leonardo Uribe, Martin Marinschek, Jakob Korherr, Gerhard
Petracek, Rudy de Busscher, Jan Kees Van
hi leo,
right now i don't see a reason why it should take a lot of time. in the end
you just have to look at the resulting artifacts.
the javadoc plugin is no blocker (if there is no official release, we can do
an external release. as soon as there is an official release of it, we can
switch
check concurrency problems over static maps holding class metadata information
(_ComponentAttributesMap and MetaRulesetImpl)
Key: MYFACES-3216
Hi Gerhard
Does somebody reviewed if the site documentation is generated
correctly? Isn't any problem with @JSFWebConfigParam? has anybody
debugged something with the proposed code?. That's the unresolved
questions I want to solve before apply it (I already mention that
without response, right?),
Here is my opinion:
the purpose of AbortProcessingException is similar as
ValidatorException or ConverterException. These are thrown as a result
of normal lifecycle processing.
With AbortProcessingExpcetion it is (or should be) possible to achieve
this:
h:commandButton
f:actionListener
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3216.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
2.0.8
Hi,
I agree with Gerhard.
Unfortunately I did not try a whole release + site build with the new
configuration since you always do that, Leo. So please check on that
as soon as possible for you.
Regards,
Jakob
2011/7/11 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi leo,
actually we should
Hi,
Leo, I really get your point that we can't change this stuff. Changing
SPI stuff (even just renaming packages) will break application server
integation code, we all got it now..
That's why I suggested (a few mails ago, but unfortunately too vague)
keeping the package names *.spi, *.spi.impl
hi jakob,
i suggest the same approach like before. last time leo requested some
changes and had to start the vote (with a short description) and this time
it's your turn.
if you feel that we need a vote about it, please feel free to start one.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF
Hi Gerhard,
OK, thx. Will do so!
Regards,
Jakob
2011/7/11 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi jakob,
i suggest the same approach like before. last time leo requested some
changes and had to start the vote (with a short description) and this time
it's your turn.
if you feel that
Hi
2011/7/11 Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com:
Here is my opinion:
the purpose of AbortProcessingException is similar as
ValidatorException or ConverterException. These are thrown as a result
of normal lifecycle processing.
I agree with you.
With AbortProcessingExpcetion it is
Hi,
I am using trinidad components such as selectOneChoice with the attribute
autosubmit=true and then listening to the events triggered by these
components
in a panelGroupLayout.
Somehow, if I have them all in one form they get changed even if I didn't
change
them. I think would be able to
Hi
2011/7/11 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Leo, I really get your point that we can't change this stuff. Changing
SPI stuff (even just renaming packages) will break application server
integation code, we all got it now..
That's why I suggested (a few mails ago, but
Hi
2011/7/11 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi jakob,
i suggest the same approach like before. last time leo requested some
changes and had to start the vote (with a short description) and this time
it's your turn.
if you feel that we need a vote about it, please feel free to
hi leo,
if both of you agree on the rest, we won't need a vote - that's right.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/7/12 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-3209:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
2.0.8
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063581#comment-13063581
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3190:
-
That log is deliberately there,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-3194:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
2.0.8
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063636#comment-13063636
]
Leonardo Uribe edited comment on MYFACES-3207 at 7/12/11 1:09 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063639#comment-13063639
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3207:
-
The patch proposed is nice stuff. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13063643#comment-13063643
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3202:
-
I think in this case it could be
39 matches
Mail list logo
