Hi,
This thread is already a 7 month "discussion", actually a vote. But I don't remember another about this point (not releasing the plugins). So I reuse
it, with a security perspective.
The last CVEs we had are possible because of ecommerce. A bunch of others were
related to Solr, etc.
I
Le 19/05/2024 à 10:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task?
TIA
Jacques
Forgot, I did not find any at
https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/ofbiz/html5/developer-manual.html#_apache_ofbiz_plugins_for_developer
Hi,
Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task?
TIA
Jacques
on this subject ?
Nicolas
Le 28/03/2024 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next
week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934)
Jacques
Le 09/05/2024 à 13:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
Inline again
Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry
unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after
4. 3. blocks 1. even
) takes care of
it. He is currently at University and returns end of June to finish his work.
Best regards,
Michael
Am 09.05.2024 um 10:48 schrieb Jacques Le Roux :
Hi,
The pages
https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/service-providers.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org
Hi Michael,
Inline again
Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry
unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after
4. 3. blocks 1. even further now because those changes are not complete
Hi,
The pages
https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/service-providers.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/about-ofbiz.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/blog/ (It's only a link)
exists but are not maintained. I propose to remove them from the repo.
The News menu also would
Ah, last but not least: I think we should at least wait for Freemarker 2.3.33 that we successfully tested on demo. The vote should be soon, hence the
release.
Le 08/05/2024 à 20:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks to clarify Michael,
Inline when needed...
Le 08/05/2024 à 13:59, Michael
he release-24.05 branch,
shall we leave that up to the committers at the time, but with a reminder
that adding new features on the release-24.05 branch will increase the test
burden before a public release can be made?
Thanks,
Dan.
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:20, Jacques Le Roux
What is the differen
Thanks for confirming
Le 08/05/2024 à 15:45, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Yeah, I wanted to say that. As long as we are sure of test coverage, all
the critical paths are working.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 22:11, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Ha sorry Pranay,
I
Severity: important
Affected versions:
- Apache OFBiz before 18.12.13
Description:
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.13.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version
at 4:07 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I see only KEYS
TIA
Jacqued
Le 07/05/2024 à 11:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no
negative votes.
I am going to publish and announce the release soon.
Jacopo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024
to the release-24.05 branch,
shall we leave that up to the committers at the time, but with a reminder
that adding new features on the release-24.05 branch will increase the test
burden before a public release can be made?
Thanks,
Dan.
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:20, Jacques Le Roux
What is the difference
a release.
Jacques
Le 07/05/2024 à 17:42, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Pranay,
OK, but then only that? So far we backported any bug. So we would release a
branch with bugs in?
Le 07/05/2024 à 16:42, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
what is a blocker bug, only security?
I think it should also
Jacques
Thanks,
Dan.
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 15:20, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where
the rule is no improvements but if a consensus agrees with? In other words,
apart exceptions only bugs and not only blockers,as we did so far
regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 19:48, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where
the rule is no improvements but if a consensus agrees with? In other words,
apart exceptions only bugs and not only blockers,as we did so far
ed, so now might
be a good time to go ahead and create the release-24.05 branch from trunk.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 18:01, Jacques Le Roux
Le 06/05/2024 à 18:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks
precisely? And that are their
Hi Jacopo,
I see only KEYS
TIA
Jacqued
Le 07/05/2024 à 11:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no
negative votes.
I am going to publish and announce the release soon.
Jacopo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:06 PM Jacopo Cappellato
Le 06/05/2024 à 18:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And that are their situations?
BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And
WHAT are their situations?
Sorry, typo
BTW, to avoid to speak in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely? And
that are their situations?
Le 06/05/2024 à 18:24, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Stephen,
As I can see it, because of the number of people really involved in such tasks.
Jacques
Le 06/05/2024 à 17:45, Stephen
rged to Trunk?
Regards,
Steve
On 5/6/24 04:07, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
We should 1st clearly identify WIPs in trunk and at which stage they are each.
We can't wait and complicate the situation before that.
Jacques
Le 06/05/2024 à 10:36, gil.portenseigne a écrit :
Hi,
I feel like Michael,
the partial improvements contained in the release.
i.e. creating release branch + roadmap :)
WDYT ?
Gil
On 22/04/24 04:12, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Guys,
Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions. I
can't see why we would change our very simple way of doing
Thanks Jacopo,
<<./verify-ofbiz-release.sh -a apache-ofbiz-18.12.13>> works perfectly on
Ubuntu 20.04
+1
Jacques
Le 30/04/2024 à 17:06, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.13", the thirteenth
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release
Le 22/04/2024 à 16:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions.
I start writing that. Maybe I should rather have started by saying that I don't
understand why we should change our (simple) way of doing.
Hi Guys,
Without getting into details, I tend to disagree with your propositions. I
can't see why we would change our very simple way of doing.
When we freeze a branch, the activity can continue on trunk. It does not
interfere with the new release branch.
The only variable is the period we
Hi,
Just FYI: I inadvertently pushed /webapp/common-theme/js/package-lock.json
which was part of Pierre's PR. It uses lockfileVersion 3.
So it was build with npm 9* which is "Backwards compatible to npm v7." Actually it's also "Backwards compatible to v1 lockfiles as I experienced
(using Win7
I no longer maintain the 22.01 branch, but use "git push all" when backporting to 18.12 Not sure what happened there, we can neglect it anyway : "No
new revisions were added by this update."
Jacques
Le 11/04/2024 à 11:14, jler...@apache.org a écrit :
This is an automated email from the ASF
Hi,
There is yet no specified EOL for Tomcat 9. We can expect 2027:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/qlzpscgoqct9wspkj5qjkm34s66jswj0
I guess Daniel thought about freezed (for 24.xx) rather than released. I guess
we all agree on that.
Gaetan can of course start to work on the Tomcat 10
Le 10/04/2024 à 09:45, Florian Motteau a écrit :
Sure, I just question the fact that this important discussion (updating tomcat, which leads to a lot of work/implications) occurs via a remote task.
It may need its own thread (updating tomcat : yes ? no ? why ? how ? people insights about this
Hi Daniel, Team,
For 3 days now I have collected trunk demo errors in error.log.
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13005 for that
Jacques
Le 29/02/2024 à 16:15, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hello,
I was just checking the demo-stable logs - accessible on ofbiz-vm1 at
Hi Gil, Nicolas,
I agree it was a good thing to do. We just missed some information and
documentation.
I have added some at OFBIZ-12320
I have also replaced all groovy-test-suite by junit-test-suite in OOTB code.
I still wonder why Eclipse proposes but does not accept groovy-test-suite as a
WIP with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12995
Le 04/04/2024 à 19:13, build...@apache.org a écrit :
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed './gradlew --no-daemon ...' (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/49/builds/843
Blamelist: Jacques Le Roux
Sorry for the buzz (and multiple description editions), it seems easier than I
thought...
Le 01/04/2024 à 12:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12985
TIA
Jacques
Hi,
Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12985
TIA
Jacques
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on trunk next
week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your tests see also the patch in OFBIZ-12934)
Jacques
unexpectedly.
On Mar 24, 2024, at 11:32 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Thanks Lenny,
Oops, indeed it should be 2.0.0 everywhere. Else nothing would work ;)
I did not want to repeat all what's in links, that why I just put links.
Anyway, I'll have a look at Crypto classes’ package names, easier than
the
correct version?
Crypto classes’ package names have changed. All you would need to do is change
Java source to reflect this.
On Mar 24, 2024, at 3:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi,
We (the Apache OFBiz project) use Shiro mostly for ciphering.
We use Gradle and refer to Maven
Hi,
We (the Apache OFBiz project) use Shiro mostly for ciphering.
We use Gradle and refer to Maven for dependencies.
We recently upgraded from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12961
As we we had only this dependency, I started by replacing shiro-core:1.13.0 by
Fixed
Le 23/03/2024 à 07:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25642
'
+ implementation 'org.apereo.cas:cas-server-core-util:5.0.10'
+ implementation 'org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-ldap-core:5.0.10'
Still not sure what to do yet anyway
Jacques
Le 23/03/2024 à 12:11, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Daniel for the quick answer :)
Maybe in the meantime we could
s,
Dan.
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 at 10:28, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi,
I'd appreciate confirmations about local build.
And, before reverting, if you have an idea don't hesitate :)
TIA
Jacques
Le 23/03/2024 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux (Jira) a écrit :
[
https://issues.apache.org/
Hi,
I'd appreciate confirmations about local build.
And, before reverting, if you have an idea don't hesitate :)
TIA
Jacques
Le 23/03/2024 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux (Jira) a écrit :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12961?page
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25642
Happens:
https://www.google.com/search?q=GitHub+Actions+has+encountered+an+internal+error
Le 18/03/2024 à 07:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
[apache/ofbiz-framework] Run failed: Scorecard supply-chain security - trunk
(a9a3d13)
GitHub
[apache/ofbiz-framework] Scorecard supply-chain
Le Roux (Jira)
Répondre à :dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Pour : notificati...@ofbiz.apache.org
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-12934:
---
Summary: Test next FreeMarker release Key: OFBIZ-12934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12934
Project: OFBiz
Hi,
Forgot to say that this has been done as suggested below and can be easily seen
on site
Jacques
Le 21/02/2024 à 09:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 19/02/2024 à 09:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 18/02/2024 à 20:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 13/02/2024 à 09:35, Jacques Le Roux
Pierre's help was successful:
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/8122898106
Le 02/03/2024 à 08:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
I don't know what to do with that. I locally tried "gradlew --console plain
distTar" and it works. But when I rebuild on
Hi Dan,
About the logs in Webtools it's also limited to "OFBiz logs".
I mean you can't see the access_logs. They are sometime very useful too.
So yes I agree this would be something we could do.
Jacques
Le 29/02/2024 à 16:15, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hello,
I was just checking the
Hi Daniel,
I don't know what to do with that. I locally tried "gradlew --console plain
distTar" and it works. But when I rebuild on GH it does not.
Jacques
Le 01/03/2024 à 21:24, GitBox a écrit :
The GitHub Actions job "Build and push docker images" on ofbiz-framework.git
has failed.
Run
Hi,
@committers: I don't remember if I already told you so: in case BB fails and it works locally, you can rebuild in BB by login with you complete a.o
email address (eg: jler...@apache.org) and your ASF password
Jacques
Le 29/02/2024 à 20:09, build...@apache.org a écrit :
Build status:
Severity: critical
Affected versions:
- Apache OFBiz before 18.12.12
Description:
Possible path traversal in Apache OFBiz allowing authentication bypass.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.12, that fixes the issue.
Credit:
YunPeng - 郭 运鹏 (finder)
References:
Thanks Michael,
I agree, I see this error message for long in Git Bash (WIn7). When you compare
it's OK.
I thought got a real compare Issue in WIn7. I did not reproduce in Ubuntu 20.04. I also get there the checksum error message with the script where the
values compare well.
Another issue
Le 19/02/2024 à 09:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 18/02/2024 à 20:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 13/02/2024 à 09:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Now that it's soon 3 years that we did not Tweet anything, I think we should
follow this advice
https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/ofbiz
Hi Vivek,
Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing
List.
Please subscribe to the *user ML* for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on
Le 18/02/2024 à 20:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 13/02/2024 à 09:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Now that it's soon 3 years that we did not Tweet anything, I think we should
follow this advice
https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/ofbiz
Jacques
Actually there is more than
Le 13/02/2024 à 09:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Now that it's soon 3 years that we did not Tweet anything, I think we should
follow this advice
https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/ofbiz
Jacques
Actually there is more than that: Linkedin and Facebook.
Both need you to sign in, hence
24 à 18:19, michael.br...@ecomify.de a écrit :
Hi Jaques,
I‘ll check when I‘m back,
Regards,
Michael
Am 17.02.2024 um 06:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi,
I think we can't generate correct PDF files with AsciiDoc even on *nix OSs.
When you compare the contents of the AsciiDoc generated HTML and PDF fi
Hi,
I think we can't generate correct PDF files with AsciiDoc even on *nix OSs.
When you compare the contents of the AsciiDoc generated HTML and PDF files,
it's clear that some parts are missing in PDF.
And I don't speak only about issues with some images files like SVG.
I suggest to stop
Le 15/02/2024 à 10:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
After installing Scorecard as a GH actions (OFBIZ-12899), we got a suggestion
to upgrade node.js from 16 to 20 version.
Do we want to do that?
TIA
Jacques
node.js 16 is EOL: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/#end-of-life-releases
Hi,
After installing Scorecard as a GH actions (OFBIZ-12899), we got a suggestion
to upgrade node.js from 16 to 20 version.
Do we want to do that?
TIA
Jacques
tand what's going on with GPG since I have both KEYS and
apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip.asc
Do I miss something?
Jacques
Le 13/02/2024 à 14:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Since I'm on win7 using PowerShell:
PS C:\projectsASF\Git\ofbiz-framework\tools> Get-Filehash
apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip -a SHA5
\ofbiz-framework\tools\apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip.sha512
Not sure why it's different from verify-ofbiz-release.sh result :/
Le 13/02/2024 à 13:51, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Jacopo,
It seems there is at least a hash issue:
sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip
Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-18
Hi Jacopo,
It seems there is at least a hash issue:
sha check of file: apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip
Using sha file: apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip.sha512
apache-ofbiz-18.12.12.zip: D6CC3596 9BD53A4C 34E267A9 221AE76A F416E2A0 D442A219 5B16227F 2A431B2C BDCB0E05 87C334C6 19DB5EE4 ED0D1F21 5EC90253
Hi,
Now that it's soon 3 years that we did not Tweet anything, I think we should
follow this advice
https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/ofbiz
Jacques
? Does it worth it ?
Jacques
Le 17/01/2022 à 13:38, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Done
Le 14/01/2022 à 18:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
If nobody is against I'll remove this file Monday. Note that it will still be
available in Git history/log...
Jacques
Le 09/01/2022 à 09:17, Jacques
Hi,
In several msg for "[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 18.12.12 - second attempt", I
see that JDK 11 is used.
I still use JDK 8 but I wonder if we should not recommend JDK 11 in the README ?
Jacques
Thanks Jacopo,
All works as expected Win7
+1
Jacques
Le 08/02/2024 à 14:29, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread, second attempt, to publish "Apache OFBiz
18.12.12", twelfth
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
remove this deprecated file:
https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/groovyScripts.html
Jacques
Le 05/02/2024 à 15:18, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I pushed a fix but BB is still blocked
Le 05/02/2024 à 15:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
I see the problem: I have not had the plugins embedded during th
Hi Michael,
Don't worry, this is me mucking around with BB. It's OK now.
Jacques
Le 06/02/2024 à 17:13, build...@apache.org a écrit :
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Codenarc copied. (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/46/builds/647
Blamelist:
I pushed a fix but BB is still blocked
Le 05/02/2024 à 15:02, Michael Brohl a écrit :
I see the problem: I have not had the plugins embedded during the test so the
setMaxPriority3Violations were not exceeded.
Thanks,
Michael
Am 05.02.24 um 12:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
If you compare
If you compare the last in nightlies:
https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/codenarc.html
with the last locally, it's 3 priorities 3 (SpaceAfterOpeningBrace) in
fixedasset package at line 144 of FixedAssetServices.groovy
So we pass from setMaxPriority3Violations(3979) in Gradle to 3982 with
Thanks Daniel!
Le 05/02/2024 à 09:07, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Jacques - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12889 created for
this
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 10:51, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I know how to use docker compose logs --tail="1000" on demos
But how t
Hi Daniel,
Any idea?
TIA
Jacques
Le 02/02/2024 à 11:50, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
I know how to use docker compose logs --tail="1000" on demos
But how to see logs contents like
access_log
ofbiz.log
error.log
etc.
in Docker ?
TIA
Jacques
is accoring to the pre-push hook definition in .git/hooks/pre-push)
everything seems to work fine, tests are working and the codenarc Main and Test
reports are build.
I provide a PR for it.
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 04.02.24 um 08:25 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi Michael
Cool, thanks!
Le 04/02/2024 à 11:26, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
I'm currently working on a solution.
Michael
Am 04.02.24 um 08:25 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi Michael,
OK thanks, I'll have a look when I'll get a chance.
It's also weird that it works locally on both Ubuntu 20.04
r the change. It looks like it has something to do with the codenarc tasks.
I am not familiar enough with the codenarc task to help with that, any help
from others to have both issues fixed is appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 03.02.24 um 11:01 schrieb Jacq
/2024 à 17:57, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25456 for that
Jacques
Le 02/02/2024 à 14:14, build...@apache.org a écrit :
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Codenarc copied. (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2
Hi,
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25456 for that
Jacques
Le 02/02/2024 à 14:14, build...@apache.org a écrit :
Build status: BUILD FAILED: failed Codenarc copied. (failure)
Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/46/builds/635
Hi Daniel,
I know how to use docker compose logs --tail="1000" on demos
But how to see logs contents like
access_log
ofbiz.log
error.log
etc.
in Docker ?
TIA
Jacques
+1
All works as expected on Win7
Jacques
Le 13/01/2024 à 20:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.12", twelfth
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
Le 05/01/2024 à 09:25, Daniel Watford a écrit :
git clone --depth 1 --branch $branch
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins.git plugins
Hi Daniel,
It needs also --single-branch:
git clone --depth 1 --single-branch --branch $branch
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins.git plugins
one step:
git clone --depth 1 --branch $branch
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins.git plugins
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 07:21, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I understand that it easier to be alerted when you receive an email
directly to your email address (inbox).
For Thunderbird msg filteri
Le 05/01/2024 à 08:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
* If you are interested about a previous (long and argumented) discussion here
you go: https://s.apache.org/556a0
TL;DR, in that email are my principal reasons:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/o73vxotkd2qgvmctoz6wxn1y05zdb1c5
TIA
log/2020-12-21-get-up-to-speed-with-partial-clone-and-shallow-clone/
Thanks for initiating this thread (to Eugen in Jira too)
Jacques
Le 04/01/2024 à 19:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Yes you are right Daniel, I remember having seen 7.62 Mb for trunk. I'll change
that tmrw :)
Le 04/01/2024 à 18:57
can't check right now, but from memory I think with depth=1, around 7MB of
data was retrieved, compared to around 160MB without depth=1.
We should try and only retrieve needed data if doing so does not introduce too
much complexity.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 09:43, Jacques Le Roux
Also inline:
La 24.12.2023 13:05, Jacques Le Roux a scris:
Hi Eugen,
I tend to agree with your vision that sounds quite promising. I'm sorry I got
no time to review your PR yet. I hope to do so during next year...
It's good that it gets some attention.
Even if the PR does not get merged
3 Jan 2024 at 18:11, Eugen Stan wrote:
Hi Jacques,
I missed this thread for some reason (was collapsed in TB) and only saw
it now.
I read the thread.
Glad to see progress on fixing the SVN issue.
Also inline:
La 24.12.2023 13:05, Jacques Le Roux a scris:
31/12/2023 à 11:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
There is a huge performance difference in favour of scripts and I found
difficult to use the scripts from Gradle.
As you may have seen, I already crossed an issue (access denied) with BB I
reported to Infra with https://issues.apache.org
owse/OFBIZ-12876 and have the docker image
builds continue to leverage gradle.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 at 09:49, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi,
Though I believe we should get rid of the Gradle pullPluginSource and
pullAllPluginsSource tasks, this morning I tried to implement the
: Jacques Le Roux
Build Text: failed 'bash -c ...' (failure)
Status Detected: new failure
Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] fd52ae3fe0bcc5edebff6f3fba939475f83c4a41
Steps:
worker_preparation: 0
git: 0
pullAllPluginsSource: 2
clean things: 0
-- ASF Buildbot
know...
Jacques
Le 23/12/2023 à 12:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
OK, we need more effort here because GH and BB will break at January 8, 2024 and we need to test the changes before... In other words we have at
most 2 weeks available...
I have one question. It seems to me that the Gradle
Hi Eugen,
Inline...
Le 24/12/2023 à 12:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Eugen,
This said I was reading
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
and stumbled upon
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/blob/master/demo-backup/README.md
Obviously
will apply to the trunk, release18.12 and release22.01 branches.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 at 08:34, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Eugen, Daniel,
Le 24/12/2023 à 12:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Last but not least, I guess we will need very soon to change something
in Docker config for demos
Hi Eugen, Daniel,
Le 24/12/2023 à 12:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Last but not least, I guess we will need very soon to change something in Docker config for demos ; since pullAllPluginsSource relies on soon not
usable SvnCheckout plugin?
Actually this last sentence was more directed
{
implementation 'org.apache.ofbiz:entity-engine:24.0'
implementation 'org.apache.ofbiz:service:24.0'
implementation 'org.apache.ofbiz:accounting:24.0'
implementation 'com.example:my-plugin:1.2.3'
}
On 23.12.2023 17:06, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
It's ready for review before pushing and testing with GH
It's ready for review before pushing and testing with GH and BB
TIA
Jacques
Le 01/12/2023 à 11:18, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868 for that...
WIP...
HTH
Jacques
Le 27/11/2023 à 13:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
As you
Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868 for that...
WIP...
HTH
Jacques
Le 27/11/2023 à 13:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
As you may have noticed*, the SvnCheckout Gradle plugin will not be usable
after January 8, 2024.
So we need a r
Hi,
As you may know this is definitely replaced by a solution in the BB UI (I sent
a message about that somewhere else)
Jacques
Le 10/07/2022 à 10:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Le 11/01/2022 à 17:54, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Also are missing, faculty to start a build from IRC and, more
Hi Ken,
Sorry I missed your message. Did you since find a way by yourself?
Jacques
Le 16/10/2023 à 16:15, Ken Mantle a écrit :
I see that in the widget-form.xsd file under there are
9 options for searching, but when I use a in my forms I only have access to the
following 4:
Begins With
1 - 100 of 24446 matches
Mail list logo
