Hi. Still i'm not convinced the problem is related to the pixel limit.
When the layer is back to in range i tend to think that this.left and
this.top should be reset to zero, which isn't the case today because
from the renderer perspective it's like resolution has never changed.
One way to solve
I have a patch that i'd like you to test. I cant post it right now but
will do as soon as i can. Cheers. Eric
2008/7/29, Eric Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just checked: zoomChanged is set to true in moveTo when coming from
setVisibility(true), so the fix describes in my previous email might
just
Thanks Eric,
I'll test your patch as soon as it's ready.
Alexandre
Eric Lemoine wrote:
I have a patch that i'd like you to test. I cant post it right now but
will do as soon as i can. Cheers. Eric
2008/7/29, Eric Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just checked: zoomChanged is set to true in
See below tyler's call out for project presentations at FOSS4G. I will be
there as well as chris schmidt and tim schaub...
Is anyone else interested in getting up on stage and saying something? In
the past, I think chris has done a good job of
this but certainly welcome to offers
e
--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Alexandre Dube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Eric,
I'll test your patch as soon as it's ready.
I attached it to http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1631. It is untested.
--
Eric
___
Dev mailing list
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:45:00PM -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
Hey-
Wondering if others think a move to subversion 1.5 would be good.
A few features would be nice for OL development. Particularly merge
tracking. From the release notes:
At the moment, moving to subversion 1.5 on the server
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:45:00PM -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
Hey-
Wondering if others think a move to subversion 1.5 would be good.
A few features would be nice for OL development. Particularly merge
tracking.
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 14:39 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:45:00PM -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
Wondering if others think a move to subversion 1.5 would be good.
It doesn't look like Subversion 1.5 has been backported to Debian Etch
(which is what the OL server
I have tested with IE8 beta 1 and it is horribly messed up. Google Maps
won't even render properly so its not limited to OpenLayers rendering
improperly. I wouldn'y plan on trying to make it work until its nearing
Release Candidate stages as it appears Microsoft will be doing some
significant work
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:08:29PM +0200, Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) wrote:
Hi list,
has anybody done some testing with IE8 beta already? Is the upcoming 2.7
release expected to be compatible with IE8 beta?
Bart,
There are no plans to test OL 2.7 with IE8.
At this point, the only
Hi Everybody,
Is it ok if the Scale control registers a moveend event instead of a
zoomend ? To recalculate the scale after panning doesn't look very useful to
me. What do you think ?
--
Alexandre Dubé
Mapgears
www.mapgears.com
___
Dev
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 03:37:05PM -0400, Alexandre Dube wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Is it ok if the Scale control registers a moveend event instead of a
zoomend ? To recalculate the scale after panning doesn't look very useful
to me. What do you think ?
At some point in the future, the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Christopher Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 03:37:05PM -0400, Alexandre Dube wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Is it ok if the Scale control registers a moveend event instead of a
zoomend ? To recalculate the scale after panning doesn't look
Hello
For the grid strategy I needed a specialized tile class. What
logically came to mind was create a child class of OpenLayers.Tile,
namely OpenLayers.Tile.Vector. Looking at OpenLayers.Tile I discovered
that OpenLayers.Tile includes back-buffer code that my class wouldn't
need. For that
14 matches
Mail list logo
