Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

he article has already been split and "Apache >>>> OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article ( >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big >>>> deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the PO

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

I would oppose the POV opinions about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence the corrections to the infobox information). I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not be precise, for example which release was the first release to have t

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

; deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions >> about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence >> the corrections to the infobox information). >> I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

ady been split and "Apache > OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article ( > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big > deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions > about Apache not having legal rights to

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

By golly you are right, I didn't notice that mr. David Gerard has really turned this into a personal crusade of his. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2015-09-15, 5:17 PM John D'Orazio wrote: > >> Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is different, because the >

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On 2015-09-15, 5:17 PM John D'Orazio wrote: Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is different, because the adjective that is used for the project whether "dormant" or "moribund" is not in fact actually being referred to the Apache project but to the pre-Apache project. No. It is Apa

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> > >> supportable rationale for removing anything that's there, > although > > > one > > > > > >> could question the motives of whoever made it a point to call > out > > > some > > > > > >> concerns

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

ck of activity in the first paragaph of the > > article. > > > > >> Nonetheless, I think any attempt to modify that will face > > opposition. > > > > >> > > > > >> In a related vein, The Guardian recently ran this article titled > > > &g

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

; > > > >> > > > > > > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2015/sep/03/switch-openoffice-libreoffice-or-microsoft-office > > > >> > > > >> I don't know if there's any easy way to counter this narrative > that'

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

ep/03/switch-openoffice-libreoffice-or-microsoft-office > > >> > > >> I don't know if there's any easy way to counter this narrative that's > > >> spreading through the press, about AOO being dead/dormant/whatever, or > > how > > >> LO is cl

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence the corrections to the infobox information). I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not be precise, for example which

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

"Apache >> OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article ( >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big >> deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions >> about Apache not having legal rights to th

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

y been split and "Apache > > OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article ( > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big > > deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions > > about Apache not h

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence the corrections to the infobox information). I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not be precise, for example which release was t

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence the corrections to the infobox information). I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edi

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Well this is interesting information. I was wondering if there might be editing wars forever! :) > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > >> https://twitter.com/davidgerard >> >> >> Am 14.09.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Max Merbald: >> >>

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

gt;>>> >>>>> "Should I >>>> >>>>> Switch From Apache OpenOffice to LibreOffice or Microsoft Office". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Hi Max, On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: Hi there, the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they have the information from. The source

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Hi Max, On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: Hi there, the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they have the information from. The sources they use don't say so. I think it's definitely bad for OpenOffi

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

the press, about AOO being dead/dormant/whatever, or > how > >> LO is clearly "the winner", but it's definitely unfortunate to see this > >> kind of stuff spread around so widely. :-( > >> > >> > >> Phil > >> > >> >

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

ASF Memorials page: http://www.apache.org/memorials/ >>> >>> Thanks a lot for this. I recommend that the entire past thread on this >>> dev list is scanned for information, since we already have some >>> material: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40openoff

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

entire past thread on this dev list is scanned for information, since we already have some material: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40openoffice.apache.org/msg24780.html As for me, I can only restate that I never had the occasion to be in personal contact with Ian, unfortunately. But I believe we

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

ad on this > dev list is scanned for information, since we already have some material: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40openoffice.apache.org/msg24780.html > > As for me, I can only restate that I never had the occasion to be in > personal contact with Ian, unfortunately. But I b

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

ate to see this >> kind of stuff spread around so widely. :-( >> >> >> Phil >> >> >> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts >> wrote: >> >> Hi Max, >>&

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On 10/09/2015 Max Merbald wrote: If people read on the Wikipedia that AOO is "dormant" OpenOffice is not dormant, as of today. A link that can dispel the myth is https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2 (and blog posts that will come, but this is enough for the time bein

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

Am 09/10/2015 11:24 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: As I never had the pleasure of working with him, I could only cull our mailing lists and other OpenOffice online information concerning his participation in OpenOffice. But, I would very much like to include more detailed information on his work with

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

On 10/09/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: We would very much like to include a tribute page for Ian Lynch on the ASF Memorials page: http://www.apache.org/memorials/ Thanks a lot for this. I recommend that the entire past thread on this dev list is scanned for information, since we already have some

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

Beside what I already mention on my previous email. I would like to suggest, althought they are no longer in the community maybe Daniel Carrera and Manfred Reiter could share some of the information about Ian and the work he was involved with. I am cc them on this email. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at

Ian Lynch information needed

We would very much like to include a tribute page for Ian Lynch on the ASF Memorials page: http://www.apache.org/memorials/ As I never had the pleasure of working with him, I could only cull our mailing lists and other OpenOffice online information concerning his participation in OpenOffice. But

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

; >> Phil >> >> >> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts >> wrote: >> >> Hi Max, >>> >>> On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: >>>> >>

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Hi Max, On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: Hi there, the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they have the information from. The sources they use don't say so. I think it's definitely bad for O

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >> Hi Max, >> >>> On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> the Engish Wikipedia claims that

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> > > Hi there, > > > > the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they > have the information from. The sources they use don't say so. I think it's > definitely bad for OpenOffice when people think no more is done about it. > The pr

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Hi Max, > On 03 Sep 15, at 16:31, Max Merbald wrote: > > Hi there, > > the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they have > the information from. The sources they use don't say so. I think it's > definitely bad for OpenOffice whe

Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Hi there, the Engish Wikipedia claims that AOO is dormant. I can't see where they have the information from. The sources they use don't say so. I think it's definitely bad for OpenOffice when people think no more is done about it. The problem is also that LibreOffice has jus

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

AOO? > > Regards, > > -Rob I've filed this reply, Rob, and will ask these questions when the problem arises. Rory > > > Rory > > > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > >> wrote: > >> > These acc

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

blem with other applications and their documents, or only with AOO? Regards, -Rob > Rory > >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >> wrote: >> > These accounts don't provide enough information to nail anything down to >> > root causes

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

d problems about read-only files are due to faulty user interaction with Win10. It is most helpful to have confirmation of that point. Rory > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > These accounts don't provide enough information to nail anything

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

within the apps as well as double-clicking the documents from the File Explorer. I experienced no file permission issues. -Rob On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > These accounts don't provide enough information to nail anything down to root > causes, and

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

ial Solutions - IBM Connections Cloud, Architecture& Strategy From: Rob Weir To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org" Date: 08/04/2015 05:49 Subject:Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems I see this as well: http://www.cnet.com/forums/discussions/windows-10

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

ce.apache.org" Date: 08/04/2015 05:49 Subject:Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems I see this as well: http://www.cnet.com/forums/discussions/windows-10-changed-all-my-documents-to-read-only/ The test to do is check the file in Windows Explorer. Right c

RE: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

These accounts don't provide enough information to nail anything down to root causes, and some of the forum cases are not resolved one way or the other yet. My main desktop machine upgraded (with my permission) to Windows 10 Pro x64 on the evening of July 29. I already had AOO 4.1.

Re: For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

I see this as well: http://www.cnet.com/forums/discussions/windows-10-changed-all-my-documents-to-read-only/ The test to do is check the file in Windows Explorer. Right click and go to the Properties panel. If it is marked "read only" there, with AOO not even running, then it is an OS issue.

For Information: Reported Windows 10 problems

I should stat by saying that I do not now use Windows other than an old version for access to archived files in old formats, so what I write below is based on a quick analysis from memory of recent Forum postings. There are a number of reported Windows 10 problems, some of which are being laid

Re: Information

On 13/03/15 14:31, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Were you offered a clear opportunity to decline the additional content that > their DownloadAdmin included along with Apache OpenOffice? With my Linux box, using Firefox with Adblock on, and NoScript on, and something else that blocks things from we

RE: Information

Thanks for the information. It is not clear what can be done about this. There will be some investigation to determine what can be done. - Dennis I notice that Yahoo has already determined that they cannot recommend the site. It is interesting what http://us.com has as a business model

Re: Information

Hi Dewey, thank you for pointing us to that site. Dewey Monroe schrieb: I just wanted to let you know that I made the mistake of attempting to download OO 4.1.1 from the following site *openoffice*.com

Information

I just wanted to let you know that I made the mistake of attempting to download OO 4.1.1 from the following site *openoffice*.com

Re: Missing dependency information

n October 2015 and now > http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 has ceased to be > available. Can anyone please point me to the new location for this > or its replacement? > Rory -- I don't see that particular area for "extensions" even back 2 years. Most of

Missing dependency information

I'm trying to compile some existing java code (which I did not write) for OO 4.1.1. It compiled and installed correctly for me about October 2014, but although it now compiles, it does not install. I find that between October 2015 and now http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 has c

Re: New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Lynn wrote: > Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who > is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have > familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is > any

Re: New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

gt; is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have > familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is > any information on the folder layout of AOO. As it stands whenever we find > a bug that seems reasonably easy to fix we don't have the f

New Contributor Looking for Directory Information

Hi, my name is Patrick Lynn and I am a student at College of Charleston who is working on bug fixes for AOO this semester with my team. We have familiarized ourselves with the bug system but I was wondering if their is any information on the folder layout of AOO. As it stands whenever we find a

Re: Fwd: Practical information regarding FOSDEM stands

01/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: Forwarded Message Subject: Practical information regarding FOSDEM stands Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:09:29 +0100 (CET) From: FOSDEM Stands Team To: Michael Dear Michael, This email contains a lot of practical information. Please read it

Re: Need more information

Dear Mr Kawthekar, > On 05 Dec2014, at 22:07, Pramod Kawthekar wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > > > We are planning to implement Op[en office in our Office. I( have some issues > / point , please send me the solution. > > > > 1. Can we use open office on think client Ubentu server ( Linex)

Need more information

Dear Sir, We are planning to implement Op[en office in our Office. I( have some issues / point , please send me the solution. 1. Can we use open office on think client Ubentu server ( Linex) ? So single EXE can be share by how many users ? 2. Can we open latest version MS offic

Re: crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

ases the crashdump feature AFAIK never was enabled. > > It was enabled when I did the Linux builds, though it was obscure to > activate it, see http://markmail.org/message/nhnagqfq7vba57hi > > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina > Thanks for

Re: crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 23.10.2014 01:08, Kay Schenk wrote: > >I know the crash reporter was disabled sometime before March, 2012. > > > >But can someone provide the commit message on this? > > As far as I know there was no explicit commit for this. Enab

Re: crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

this removal to the release notes as we continue to get questions >> about it. > > It wasn't even enabled in our first published artifact (AOO 3.4.0-Beta). > >> Unfortunately, information about this wa

Re: crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

enabled in our first published artifact (AOO 3.4.0-Beta). Unfortunately, information about this was just recently removed from the Help files, so miscommunication *for a while*. Thanks to all who fixed this problem in the help files! Herbert

crash reporter -- can someone supply commit information on this?

, information about this was just recently removed from the Help files, so miscommunication *for a while*. -- - MzK "Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure. Only the paranoid su

Re: information needed on translation of helpcontent2?

e/aoo40help/ > > > > > Can someone fill us in on what the process is for translation of > > helpcontent2, internal help. > > > Your comment implies that links to all translation "projects" in Pootle >

Re: information needed on translation of helpcontent2?

On 19 July 2014 10:50, Tal Daniel wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > We've had a number of volunteers lately helping with translating of AOO > > to new languages and dialects and that's great! In attempting to find > > out more about the procedures necessary for f

Re: information needed on translation of helpcontent2?

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > We've had a number of volunteers lately helping with translating of AOO > to new languages and dialects and that's great! In attempting to find > out more about the procedures necessary for full incorporation into the > product, I found our Po

information needed on translation of helpcontent2?

We've had a number of volunteers lately helping with translating of AOO to new languages and dialects and that's great! In attempting to find out more about the procedures necessary for full incorporation into the product, I found our Pootle User Guide: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User

For Information: Print comments in margin

Apparently the ability to print comments in the margin will be in a future LibO (4.3?) http://caolanm.blogspot.ie/2014/04/printing-comments-in-margins.html triggered by an additional option in the print dialog, the page being printed at 75% to permit space for the comments. -- Rory O'Farrell

Re: New Volunteer Information

Jake Thomas wrote: > Good afternoon, > > My names Jake Thomas, from Victoria Australia, and well I guess I am looking > to help out. > > I have completed introductions lvls 1 & 2, and am in the process of reading > over lvl 3. > > The main area i would probably be able to assist in will be d

Re: New Volunteer Information

Excellent make sure you are fully subscribe to this list and continue reading the levels. If there is anything that you think you didn't understand or need more information, dont hesitate to ask. Welcome to the community and make sure to be vocal on the list so we know more about

New Volunteer Information

Good afternoon, My names Jake Thomas, from Victoria Australia, and well I guess I am looking to help out. I have completed introductions lvls 1 & 2, and am in the process of reading over lvl 3. The main area i would probably be able to assist in will be documentation, although testing diffe

4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Bug 124311] adapt product meta information (version number, ...)

j...@apache.org has granted 4.1.0_release_blocker: Bug 124311: adapt product meta information (version number, ...) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124311 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org For identifying a Beta in all relevant places we have to extend/change

Re: Submit information for OpenOffice consultants.

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Misha Konoplitskiy wrote: > Hi! > I'd like to submit information for OpenOffice consultants: > Hello Misha, I confirm receipt of this request. Our process is to wait three days to see if anyone in the project has comments or objections. I

Submit information for OpenOffice consultants.

Hi! I'd like to submit information for OpenOffice consultants: Name: 4K-Soft Country: UA, Zhitomyr Practice: Development, Support Description: We can help software developers to automate OpenOffice. We developed a library for OpenOffice automation. Library provides stable API for cre

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

; http://markmail.org/message/rn2uentbgqipx2a5 > > >> > > > >> > The exact format is not critical, but that is one way a committer > can > > >> > make it crystal clear. > > >> > > >> I understand conventions, I would like to see more conve

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

e conventions myself, > >> I dont understand however when proposal is not a proposal because it > >> didnt say [PROPOSAL]. We have a similar conversation on using dev@ for > >> support etc. > >> > > > > In my opinion, to a great

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

r can >> > make it crystal clear. >> >> I understand conventions, I would like to see more conventions myself, >> I dont understand however when proposal is not a proposal because it >> didnt say [PROPOSAL]. We have a similar conversation on using dev@ for >

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

have a similar conversation on using dev@ for > support etc. > In my opinion, to a great extent, it depends on the message content. We don't' always adhere to the [PROPOSAL]/[LAZY PROPOSAL] tag, though that would certainly make things more clear. When I see a statement posted on th

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

uld anyone discuss anything for >> just >> the fun of discussing it? >> > > Something we do see: Someone talk about an idea, but it is not > something that they are wiling/able to do. They just think it is a > good idea. But unless someone volunteers it is just talk. &

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

r actually intend to do something. >> > > Not sure I understand you here. Why would anyone discuss anything for just > the fun of discussing it? > Something we do see: Someone talk about an idea, but it is not something that they are wiling/able to do. They just think it is a good

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

e explicitly stated -- or else other participants don't have any idea if you're just discussing something or actually intend to do something. > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

ty 'you didnt use blue ink to fill out your form' kind of situation.​ > or else other participants don't have any idea if you're just discussing > something or actually intend to do something. > ​Not sure I understand you here. Why would anyone discuss an

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

n power negotiations (HBR article on the topic: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4354.html). On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > The information we cur

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > The information we currently have on Decision Making can be found in our > > Orientation section: > > > > http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/decision-makin

Re: Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > The information we currently have on Decision Making can be found in our > Orientation section: > > http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/decision-making.html > > On that page, there are explanations for types of decis

Does our "Decision Making" information need additional instructions?

The information we currently have on Decision Making can be found in our Orientation section: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/decision-making.html On that page, there are explanations for types of decision making used in this project specifically and within the Apache Software

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

@dave: Now I am back on duty :-) The footer info you need are in https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/machines/vms/ooo-wiki2-vm.apache.org/x1/wiki/skins/Aoo.php around line 107 and https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/machines/vms/ooo-wiki2-vm.apache.org

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On 21 July 2013 21:48, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2013, at 7:28 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 21 July 2013 16:25, janI wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On 21 July 2013 16:03, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:07 AM, janI wrote: > >>> > On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave F

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On Jul 21, 2013, at 7:28 AM, janI wrote: > On 21 July 2013 16:25, janI wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 21 July 2013 16:03, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:07 AM, janI wrote: >>> On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, R

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On 21 July 2013 16:25, janI wrote: > > > > On 21 July 2013 16:03, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:07 AM, janI wrote: >> >> > On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave Fisher wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Da

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On 21 July 2013 16:03, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:07 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dave Fisher > >> wrote: > Hi MWiki, > > T

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On Jul 21, 2013, at 12:07 AM, janI wrote: > On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dave Fisher >> wrote: Hi MWiki, The MWiki is missing a few key items: See: http://www.

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On 21 July 2013 03:34, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > >> Hi MWiki, > >> > >> The MWiki is missing a few key items: > >> > >> See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation > >> > > > >

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi MWiki, >> >> The MWiki is missing a few key items: >> >> See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation >> > > That is guidance for the "project website". That website is >

Re: MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi MWiki, > > The MWiki is missing a few key items: > > See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation > That is guidance for the "project website". That website is http://openoffice.apache.org, yes? Of course, the project also

MWiki is Missing Key Navigation and Apache Trademark information.

Hi MWiki, The MWiki is missing a few key items: See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation Left Navigation: (1) A link back to the main openoffice.apache.org. (2) A link back to the main www.openoffice.org. (3) "Main Page" is misleading and should be something like "Wiki Home Pa

Re: some information...bulk checksum verification for downloads

e downloaded md5 hash from Mac 3.4.1 en-GB and, ta da, it > popped up with the correct "dist" file, and other useful information. > > -- > > - > MzK > > Succes

some information...bulk has verification for downloads

, I came across a neat little cgi on the Apache server that our users might be able to use: http://people.apache.org/~henkp/cgi-bin/md5.cgi I put in the downloaded md5 hash from Mac 3.4.1 en-GB and, ta da, it popped up with the correct "dist" file, and

Re: [WWW]There is no "contact information" on the wiki

assisting users with registration difficulties. The best place to find out information and to ask Questions is on our forums. We therefore only respond by email to those questions that cannot be resolved through using our forums. http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t

Re: [WWW]There is no "contact information" on the wiki

Am Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 um 22:09 schrieb Rob Weir: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, RGB ES wrote: > > 2013/6/28 Rob Weir > > > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:29 AM, RGB ES wrote: > > > > One user on the forums report problems registering on the wiki(1), but > > > > > > did > > > > not find h

Re: [WWW]There is no "contact information" on the wiki

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, RGB ES wrote: > 2013/6/28 Rob Weir > >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:29 AM, RGB ES wrote: >> > One user on the forums report problems registering on the wiki(1), but >> did >> > not find how to report those problems or just ask for help. A "contact >> > info" page is

Re: [WWW]There is no "contact information" on the wiki

2013/6/28 Rob Weir > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:29 AM, RGB ES wrote: > > One user on the forums report problems registering on the wiki(1), but > did > > not find how to report those problems or just ask for help. A "contact > > info" page is missing from the wiki. Which is the best way to impleme

<    1   2   3   >