Am 02.03.21 um 20:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Am 02.03.21 um 19:39 schr
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 02.03.21 um 19:39 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> I responded
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 02.03.21 um 19:39 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi -
>>
>> I responded. The way the mirror system works is that there is a blanket
>> exclusion of the OpenOffice release di
Hi Dave,
Am 02.03.21 um 19:39 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi -
>
> I responded. The way the mirror system works is that there is a blanket
> exclusion of the OpenOffice release directory from mirroring.
Yes, but if I remember the discussion right, Infra could now offer AOO
at least
Hi -
I responded. The way the mirror system works is that there is a blanket
exclusion of the OpenOffice release directory from mirroring.
Regards,
Dave
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:35 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> What do you think about it?
>
> h
Hi all.
What do you think about it?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128428
Although it seems that only the source archives need to be served from
the mirrors I would not be unhappy if the ASF would serve AOO from their
mirror system as well.
Regards,
Matthias
smime.p7s
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:12 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Mirror OpenOffice
> You have asked for an alternate DL Link. This is the
> alternate DL link.
Just rea
Am 09.10.20 um 11:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:36 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: New Mirror OpenOffice
Check this link:
https://dist.Apache.Org/repos/dist/release/openoffice
2020 09:48:39 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt"
> :
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 8:12 PM
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: Re: New Mirro
Am 09.10.20 um 13:12 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 12:36 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Mirror OpenOffice
Am 09.10.20 um 11:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 12:36 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
> Am 09.10.20 um 11:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> -Original Messag
Am 09.10.20 um 11:54 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:36 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: New Mirror OpenOffice
Check this link:
https://dist.Apache.Org/repos/dist/release/openoffice
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:36 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
> Check this link:
> https://dist.Apache.Org/repos/dist/release/openoffice
yes, a
8:12 PM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
>> 9 years ago when the project joined it was decided that
>> OpenOffice was too heavy for the mirror system. Until
>> recently we had to let Infra know before we made a release in
>> order to m
Hello Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 8:12 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: New Mirror OpenOffice
> 9 years ago when the project joined it was decided that
> OpenOffice was too heavy for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 8:12 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
> Am 08.10.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> -Original
Hi Jörg,
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 7:28 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mir
Am 08.10.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 7:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
Am 07.10.20 um 10:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message
örg Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 7:28 PM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
>>>
>>> Am 0
noffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
> >
> > Am 07.10.20 um 10:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 12:31
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 7:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
> Am 07.10.20 um 10:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> -Original
Am 07.10.20 um 10:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 12:31 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Moderator
Cc: Desmond van der Winden - Serverion
Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
Hi Desmond
Hello Marcus,
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 12:31 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Moderator
> Cc: Desmond van der Winden - Serverion
> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
>
> Hi
Hi Desmond,
thank you very much for your interest in Apache OpenOffice.
Please note that the Apache OpenOffice project do not have an own mirror
system anymore as it was as OpenOffice belonged to Sun and Oracle.
But Apache has an own mirror system you can participate in.
Especially
*From:* Desmond van der Winden - Serverion [mailto:desm...@serverion.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 4, 2020, 17:54 UTC
*To:* dev-ow...@openoffice.apache.org
*Subject:* New Mirror OpenOffice
Hi,
We have set up a new mirror
Should such information not come from Apache OpenOffice.
> How can I trust this?
>
> On 09/07/2020 11:24, Get Hosted Online - Accounts, Billing and Technical
> Support wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This is to notify you of our intention to mirror your infrastructure
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 10:07 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: download from a mirror?
> The scripts for dist.apache.org/release that sync up Apache
> releases to the mirrors fully exclude the OpenO
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> But I was surprised that apparently not even a single mirror mirrors the
>> üpenoffice/ directory. In the past there were many mirors offering OOo, I
>> guess at least 20.
>
&
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
But I was surprised that apparently not even a single mirror mirrors the
üpenoffice/ directory. In the past there were many mirors offering OOo, I guess
at least 20.
In theory we have a mechanism for it:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi
but I don't think
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2018 4:47 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: download from a mirror?
> many mirrors do not replicate the OpenOffice tree due to its
> very large
> size.
Yes, that's quite u
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2018 4:47 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: download from a mirror?
>
> On 21/07/2018 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > Is there currently any
On 21/07/2018 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Is there currently any alternative to Sourceforge for downloading?
(Because: The Apache mirror should not be used.)
ASF mirrors, with their current capabilities, should not be used for
downloads of the latest release due to disk space and bandwidth issues
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2018 4:45 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: download from a mirror?
>
> Am 21.07.2018 um 11:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > Is there a reason tha
the move from Oracle to the ASF,
Apache and we have decided not to use the ASP mirror system as the size
of a single OpenOffice release is really big - and all releases together
are just insane big. We just don't wanted to risk complaints from the
sysadmins of the mirrors.
This is years ago
Hello,
Is there a reason that I can't find AOO anywhere on the mirrors?
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi
Maybe it is just a technical problem that the directory openoffice/ is not
synchronized on the mirrors?
greetings,
Jörg
On 31/12/2016 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
The github mirror stopped updating the source tree over 10 months ago.
This was a known issue, reported months ago, but (unexpectedly) Infra
found the time to fix it earlier this week, so the broken Github
non-mirror is now a mirror again; see
https
FWIW,
The github mirror stopped updating the source tree over 10 months ago.
Cheers,
Pedro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Gavin McDonald wrote:
From: Andrea Pescetti
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11601
How long has it been broken?
I opened the above issue in April 2016.
Has infra been asked to fix it?
In the issue I say that the Github mirror is broken and I ask if there
is a way to fix it. I
*Browser variables* *Values*navigator.appCodeName Mozillanavigator.appName
Netscapenavigator.appVersion 5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36 navigator.platformLinux
x86_64 navigator.oscpuundefined navigator.cpuClassundefined
Hi,
Can you be more specific saying what you attempted to download, and what
issue you encountered? Also could be useful to know which mirror.
Thanks in advance.
Roberto
2014-08-19 11:57 GMT+02:00 Ray Dobie tvvoc...@gmail.com:
*Browser variables* *Values*navigator.appCodeName
On 08/19/2014 02:57 AM, Ray Dobie wrote:
*Browser variables* *Values*navigator.appCodeName Mozillanavigator.appName
Netscapenavigator.appVersion 5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36
(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36 navigator.platformLinux
x86_64
to it from the main download pages anyway.
And of course the question is for what we do need the binaries on this
mirrors if they are not found or used by the majority of our users.
It's a secondary mirror system. Although due to the usual size/bandwidth
considerations the OpenOffice project
on this
mirrors if they are not found or used by the majority of our users.
It's a secondary mirror system. Although due to the usual size/bandwidth
considerations the OpenOffice project uses SourceForge, Infra did
significant work to be able to offer OpenOffice on the Apache mirrors.
We can do
.
And of course the question is for what we do need the binaries on this
mirrors if they are not found or used by the majority of our users.
It's a secondary mirror system. Although due to the usual size/bandwidth
considerations the OpenOffice project uses SourceForge, Infra did
significant
decide that, then I am sure infra wont have a problem.
Actually, it was Infra who pushed for having the Apache mirrors as a
secondary mirror network, after we followed their advice not to offer
binaries from the Apache mirrors as a primary channel due to
size/bandwidth
constraints. I
infra wont have a problem.
Actually, it was Infra who pushed for having the Apache mirrors as a
secondary mirror network, after we followed their advice not to offer
binaries from the Apache mirrors as a primary channel due to
size/bandwidth constraints. I like the idea to have a secondary
, it was Infra who pushed for having the Apache mirrors as a
secondary mirror network, after we followed their advice not to offer
binaries from the Apache mirrors as a primary channel due to size/bandwidth
constraints. I like the idea to have a secondary mirror network at Apache,
while I find it too
Am 11/22/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Andrew Rist:
On 11/22/2013 1:52 AM, jan i wrote:
On 22 November 2013 10:34, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/22/13 9:52 AM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
We have been discussion to reduce our footprint on the mirrors, see:
Hi.
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which
On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can
(the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against).
can you share your thoughts against a complete switch with us. I am
On 12 November 2013 16:57, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy
can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against).
can you share your thoughts against a complete switch with us. I am at
least interested to learn more about
On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
based on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read
have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against).
I recommend to reopen ticket 5590 with a comment asking for a read/only
mirror. Jfarrell is right now
Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against).
can you share your thoughts against a complete switch with us. I am at
least interested to learn more about others opinion
(the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against).
I recommend to reopen ticket 5590 with a comment asking for a read/only
mirror
XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I for one would be against
on the discussion in thread XML files are binary and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (which I
Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only GIT mirror
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would
the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only
GIT mirror? The complaints I've seen so far are mostly in the other
direction (i.e., committing or applying patches). I'm not talking about
generic
, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only
GIT mirror? The complaints I've seen so far are mostly in the other
direction (i.e., committing or applying patches). I'm not talking
reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only
GIT mirror? The complaints I've seen so far are mostly in the other
direction (i.e., committing or applying
:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for
now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only
GIT mirror
:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read-only
GIT mirror? The complaints I've seen so far are mostly in the other
...@apache.org
wrote:
Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I
?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for
now.
And what would be the advantage for real contributors in having a
read
On 12.11.2013 20:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
@herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket, or should I ?
I have reopened the JIRA issue and requested a read-only mirror for now.
And what would be the advantage for real
Dear all,
We create a linux distro mirrors - CentOS , Debian, FreeBSD, Ubuntu and
few other open source projects.
We want to mirror OpenOffice Project. We use this documentation but we
mirror only old version. New release are on sourceforge, not openoffice.org.
Can you tell me how can We
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Yovcho Yovchev yyovc...@neterra.net wrote:
Dear all,
We create a linux distro mirrors - CentOS , Debian, FreeBSD, Ubuntu and few
other open source projects.
We want to mirror OpenOffice Project. We use this documentation but we
mirror only old version. New
On 2013/05/28 2:50 PM, janI wrote:
We have INFRA 5590 pending. When I (and infra) reads it, its only a request
for a RO mirror.
Yes, it was assumed that a read-only mirror of our codebase would be an
essential step regardless on how we want to proceed.
A read-only mirror would have
tarballs via the Apache mirror network. The things that must be
distributed from the Apache dist server are the hash files and
detached signature files.
You are right, I've checked this with the current downloads. So, it can
stay as it is now.
New naming structure:
- A new structure could look
On 31/03/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
- A new structure could look like the following:
path_on_the_mirror/release_version/file_type/language_code/install_file
Some examples to make it more realistic:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
by mirrors,
but have to be offered from Apache servers only.
Is that actually true? I thought it was fine to distribute our source
tarballs via the Apache mirror network. The things that must be
distributed from the Apache dist server are the hash files and
detached signature files.
You
the source files must not be distributed by mirrors,
but have to be offered from Apache servers only.
Is that actually true? I thought it was fine to distribute our source
tarballs via the Apache mirror network. The things that must be
distributed from the Apache dist server are the hash files
-US
files only and localized for all other languages.
- Due to Apache policy the source files must not be distributed by
mirrors,
but have to be offered from Apache servers only.
Is that actually true? I thought it was fine to distribute our source
tarballs via the Apache mirror network
Many months ago we agreed to create a new file structure for the mirrors
to get rid of some historical grown limitations and complexity.
I want to continue this and come to a final result.
Current situation:
- Mostly it's about to differenciate the files between stable for
en-US files only
On 31 March 2013 18:07, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Many months ago we agreed to create a new file structure for the mirrors
to get rid of some historical grown limitations and complexity.
I want to continue this and come to a final result.
Current situation:
- Mostly it's
On Mar 31, 2013 6:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/31/2013 06:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 31 March 2013 18:07, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Many months ago we agreed to create a new file structure for the mirrors
to get rid of some historical grown limitations
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 02/04/2013 09:53 PM, schrieb Simon Schubert:
Hello,
you still looking for mirror servers? I work at the University of
Mannheim and I'm the administrator of mirror.informatik.uni-mannheim.de
http
Am 02/04/2013 09:53 PM, schrieb Simon Schubert:
Hello,
you still looking for mirror servers? I work at the University of
Mannheim and I'm the administrator of mirror.informatik.uni-mannheim.de
http://mirror.informatik.uni-mannheim.de.
The server has a 2Gbps Uplink.
Best regards
Simon Schubert
Hello,
you still looking for mirror servers? I work at the University of Mannheim and
I'm the administrator of mirror.informatik.uni-mannheim.de.
The server has a 2Gbps Uplink.
Best regards
Simon Schubert
--
Simon Schubert
-
Rechenzentrum Universitaet
On 30/11/2012 Herbert Duerr wrote:
It would all be much simpler if we had an official git-mirror [1] of our
svn-repository.
OK, this will also make contributing easier for the new developers who
know only git, since they will be able to checkout (clone) only trunk,
branches and tags
directly.
It would all be much simpler if we had an official git-mirror [1] of our
svn-repository. Before filing an issue for this I'd like to get
consensus on that, even if only lazy consensus.
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/git
For the requested infos I suggest:
- Name of the codebase: Apache
86 matches
Mail list logo
