On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.orgwrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
documents. Might be nice to find and test their
On 13.02.2013 08:28, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
(OK, I guess it's better to re-subscribe to the list).
In reply to Norbert Thiebaud*:
In the Power rule, which
On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.orgwrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
documents.
On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
wrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving,
and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
On 2/13/13 12:12 PM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
wrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving,
and
On 13 February 2013 12:22, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13 12:12 PM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org
wrote:
Hi,
I reply to this mail, because I have some remarks to Andrea's statements
(see below). But please excuse, if I (as german) perhaps use not always
the right english words/expressions/definitions.)
But first:
Norbert Thibaud has cleared the mathematical questions and shown, that
On 2/8/13 11:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 06/02/2013 janI wrote:
I assume (without really knowing it) that there is an easy upgrade path
for extensions currently not being an oxt to become one. We need to
document (if not already done) this upgrade in a way, that motivates
the
extension
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
That's a big one: Release the Kraken!
The time to close the document (not saving) could be low-hanging
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.orgwrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
LO claims that much of their improvements are related
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 February 2013 23:19, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We had a thread before Christmas discussing code contributions and
best practices for how someone could contribute code to multiple
projects, e.g., AOO and LO.
I've
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
OK. I rewrote this section to be more positive:
http://openoffice.apache.org/contributing-code.html
For larges codebases - For large codebases
Don
+1 I like the page. Is it also worth publishing somehow as a blog so
outsiders notice it.
I think you have a typo near the end VCS revision.
Have a nice day.
rgds
Jan I.
On 13 February 2013 15:52, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
Da: Norbert Thiebaud
...
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
(OK, I guess it's better to re-subscribe to the list).
In reply to Norbert Thiebaud*:
In the Power rule, which *is*
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
+1 I like the page. Is it also worth publishing somehow as a blog so
outsiders notice it.
I think you have a typo near the end VCS revision.
Thanks, I fixed that, the typo Don noted and a few other spelling
errors I noticed.
I
hi all,
I love computers and since the first personal one came to brazil I've been
dealing with them.
I played with BASIC on the old times . . . saw some assembly but I'm not a
programmer - I don't like it. on the other hand I love to break the
computer and fix. I cannot count how many times I
Not answering any particular message, so top posting.
Two points:
a) Of course you can always redefine a function to fill holes on non
defined points: for example, redefining sinc(x) = sin(x)/x to be 1 on x=0
makes sense because you obtain a continuous function... but that's on 1
variable: when
FWIW;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Of course, had I implemented quaternion math using Boost, no one would be
complaining. :-P
Pedro.
[1] http://bikeshed.org
Do it, do it, do it; PLEESSEEE. :-)
Quaternions are cool.
Thank you Ricardo;
My suggestion would be to leave things as they are and give the matter a rest.
I personally prefer to focus on other (more necessary) developments like
updating python to version 2.7.4 which will be released this weekend.
We have ample time for testing and if there is new
Honestly I'd say that if anything is clear,
it's that changing away from the status quo
currently enjoys zero consensus.
As a Ph.D. mathematician who knows about Bourbaki,
all I can say is that line of argument is curious
here. There are no authorities other than the spec
to turn to about how
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Of course, had I implemented quaternion math using Boost, no one would be
complaining. :-P
Pedro.
[1] http://bikeshed.org
Do it, do it, do it;
On 11/02/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
http://openoffice.apache.org/students.html ...
Any other things that should be on the list?
Nothing to add, good text. But I would link Let us know (first bullet
point) and [have your professor] contact us (last one) to
OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
veto on this change, which is really what's
required before Pedro actually needs to revert
anything.
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Honestly I'd say that if anything is clear,
it's that changing away from the status quo
currently enjoys zero consensus.
As a Ph.D. mathematician who knows about Bourbaki,
all I can say is that line of argument is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, tony fre colapa...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
Hi Tony, thanks for writing and welcome to the Apache OpenOffice project!
I love computers and since the first personal one came to brazil I've been
dealing with them.
I played with BASIC on the old times . . .
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
it seems that nobody has stronger concerns against this proposal and I
think no vote is necessary. I will draft a blog and a mail to our
announce list that we will deprecate older package extensions with 4.0
and that we will support oxt packages only in the future.
You
Forwarding to Maarten who is not subscribed. Maarten: please go on and
feel free to ask for advice if you need help with your first build. Andrea
On 13/02/2013 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Welcome. have you tried to build the source code yet?
This may be a good starting place
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
veto on this change, which is really what's
required before Pedro actually needs to revert
anything.
I was waiting to see if there were any persuasive arguments in favor
This topic seems to be of more general interest, given the discussions
we've been having regarding the evaluation of 0^0.
When we were writing up the specification of ODF 1.2's OpenFormula we
had the goal to describe how real-world spreadsheet applications
worked today. Where they worked the
I think the days of fruitful debate
about this topic are well past us now.
What this issue needs at this point
is a decision one way or the other.
There are several ways of doing that
according to the general voting policies
at Apache: exercising those procedures
should not be viewed as blunt
Relying on jars, IMHO, is not bad, but it depends on your goals.
The point of compiling from source is that it's a first step to
actually being a developer which is why I do it. Compiling problems
aren't problems for us new developers they are puzzles to solve to
help people out.
If there are
I've been busy with building lately, especially with building on Fedora
18 with the --with-system-libs switch, which should be used for
packaging in Fedora. This is preparation work for the Fedora 19 packaging.
To isolate the problematic dependencies, I configure with something like
Hi BZ admins,
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
May I suggest some little string changes on the BZ startpage:
HTML title
--
Currently:
Apache OOo Bugzilla Main Page
New:
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla Main Page
Headline
Currently:
Welcome to Apache OOo Bugzilla
New:
Welcome
My build just crashed on the build.xml under
./main/l10ntools/java/jpropex/ at line 122 :
122classpathref=classpath
So I guess I need to set a CLASSPATH, right?
To which directory should it be set?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Maarten
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Hi BZ admins,
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
May I suggest some little string changes on the BZ startpage:
HTML title
--
Currently:
Apache OOo Bugzilla Main Page
New:
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla
On 13 February 2013 22:06, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:42:42AM +0100, janI wrote:
If performance and memory footprint is a concern, we loose a lot in our
international version,
An average set of language text takes up 1.3Mb in the code
FWIW I refreshed my memory about how
to compute polynomials numerically by
looking back at my old copy of Numerical
Recipes in C and it's always considered
bad form to evaluate the terms individually,
especially not by using the POWER function to
do it. Most of the time you want to
compute p =
On 02/13/2013 11:14 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Of course, had I implemented quaternion math using Boost, no one would be
complaining. :-P
Pedro.
[1]
On 02/13/2013 08:15 AM, tony fre wrote:
hi all,
I love computers and since the first personal one came to brazil I've been
dealing with them.
I played with BASIC on the old times . . . saw some assembly but I'm not a
programmer - I don't like it. on the other hand I love to break the
computer
Awesome!
On 02/13/2013 12:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
This topic seems to be of more general interest, given the discussions
we've been having regarding the evaluation of 0^0.
When we were writing up the specification of ODF 1.2's OpenFormula we
had the goal to describe how real-world spreadsheet
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:38:57AM +0100, janI wrote:
I don't understand what you are talking about, it looks like you are
mixing what happens during building the product, with the final product.
The final product, as can be downloaded from the final, in his language,
contain only
On 02/13/2013 02:46 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Independently of the vote result I will be effectively stopping the
development work I intended to do on Calc as I have lost all
interest on improving it given the current situation.
I totally understand.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Joe Schaefer
FWIW I refreshed my memory about how
to compute polynomials numerically by
looking back at my old copy of Numerical
Recipes in C and it's always considered
bad form to evaluate the terms individually,
especially not by using the POWER
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
...
On 02/13/2013 02:46 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Independently of the vote result I will be effectively stopping the
development work I intended to do on Calc as I have lost all
interest on improving it given the current
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:27:05PM -0600, jorge ivan poot diaz wrote:
Hello Ariel,
I did the steps you said, the compilation was successful, I made two copies
too. Now when I click the button about not the message.
And another point the basis that I have is the basis3.4.
Are
Prior to working with AOO, I thought that there was a widely-known and
generally accepted methodology for releasing incompatible changes.
However, the problem has surfaced here three times: once last spring
(encryption default), and twice currently (0⁰, and extensions with
toolbars). I want to
On 02/13/2013 12:48 PM, Fred Ollinger wrote:
Relying on jars, IMHO, is not bad, but it depends on your goals.
The point of compiling from source is that it's a first step to
actually being a developer which is why I do it. Compiling problems
aren't problems for us new developers they are
can I append a missing commit log?
I committed r1446039 on command line okay,
but r1446040and r1446041 using netbeans I missed the message:
Added IT localization files
Patch by: Fabrizio Marchesano fmarches...@gmail.com
Review by: GianAngelo Cencio gacen...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Carl
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:38:44PM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
can I append a missing commit log?
I don't use subversion, but IIRC I've seen a commit from someone
changing a log; if true, this might work:
Yes editing svn:log revprops
is admissible and done routinely.
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: missing commit log
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at
50 matches
Mail list logo
