Re: Modify JOSM download limit

2020-03-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:25 PM Yantisa Akhadi wrote: > The question is, does this limit can be modified from JOSM setting or is > it coming from the OSM server? > It's coming from the server. If you use the "Download from Overpass API" option, you'll see it'll be happy to spray as much data

Re: [josm-dev] Relation editor support for north/south and east/west similar to forward/backward

2019-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:00 PM Richard Welty wrote: > On 11/26/13 4:51 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Most streets are not strictly on the 90° raster and signposts are > > only rough directions. > > > > Addings this to OSM might make it much more difficult for Data Consumers > > to process and

Re: JOSM backports now available for Debian stable users

2016-06-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Earlier today the packages for the JOSM backport (openstreetmap-map-icons, > jmapviewer, josm & josm-plugins) were accepted into the archive, closing > the long standing bugreport. [0] > > [0]

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM wants to add a certificate?

2014-07-18 Thread Paul Johnson
Could it be a ca-cert.org so there's some kind of authority that people might have a root cert already installed for? On Jul 7, 2014 6:37 AM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote: On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Maarten Deen wrote: I opened JOSM (webstart) and it came with a question to install

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM wants to add a certificate?

2014-07-18 Thread Paul Johnson
My mistake; I wasn't thinking. Also...yeah, bad hack with no easy workaround. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Paul Hartmann phaau...@gmail.com wrote: On 18.07.2014 21:35, Paul Johnson wrote: Could it be a ca-cert.org so there's some kind of authority that people might have a root cert

[josm-dev] Color by speed or age on GPX traces

2014-01-22 Thread Paul Johnson
I was wondering if we could get the stylesheets changed so traces without timestamps could be changed to grey instead of purple by default? With them being purple, it's difficult to tell if the data point is going *really* fast or is the freshest available, or just time/speed unknown.

Re: [josm-dev] Relation editor support for north/south and east/west similar to forward/backward

2013-12-01 Thread Paul Johnson
Still feeling that cardinal directions only belong as roles in for child relations in super-relations. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi all, I'm new to this list so please bear with me. The relation editor currently only parses 'forward' and

[josm-dev] josm-latest debian package

2013-10-16 Thread Paul Johnson
Needs to allow oracle java 7 as a viable alternative dependency to the other JDKs. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] Maxspeed improvements

2012-10-01 Thread Paul Johnson
OK, here's an improved version that definitely works. I'll add the metric ones later. Haven't fixed the 25/30 mph problem yet, though. On Sunday, September 30, 2012, Paul Johnson wrote: On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:52 PM, zep...@cryptotrope.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'zep...@cryptotrope.com

[josm-dev] Maxspeed improvements

2012-09-30 Thread Paul Johnson
=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? rules xmlns=http://josm.openstreetmap.de/mappaint-style-1.0; author=Rubke, Dirk Stöcker, Vclaw, Paul Johnson shortdescription=Maxspeed de.shortdescription=Höchstgeschwindigkeit description=Show maxspeed settings in JOSM map display de.description=Anzeige der

Re: [josm-dev] Validator

2012-07-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jul 13, 2012 3:32 AM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote: Todays errors are usually hidden in the data and not clearly visible. And not everybody will add an OpenStreetBugs entry when something wrong happens on routing. I think the validator is an essential tool and I don't want

Re: [josm-dev] splitting ways and relation memberships

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder if this is a bug or intentional: when you split a way part of a turn_restriction josm only associates the relationship membership for the part of the way that touches the via point. There is not the

Re: [josm-dev] [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM

2010-12-01 Thread Paul Johnson
On 12/01/2010 05:30 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: A question, however: for WMS layers, would it be possible to automatically change the resolution of the loaded tiles, in a way similar to the slippymap tiles? Making this configurable rather than the only option would be a boon, since you

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/24/2010 04:44 AM, Frederick Rama wrote: For the end-user, there's no difference in WMS and slippy map anyway, it only confuses them. Well, Slippy Map supports tiles, wmsplugin doesn't. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/24/2010 04:44 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 11/24/2010 09:31 AM, Viesturs Zariņš wrote: Paris, Syndney seems more accurate but Moscow, Tallin has similar offset. Is there a way to improve the rectification? The JOSM slippy map plugin does not have a control for moving the layer

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/25/2010 01:23 AM, Viesturs Zariņš wrote: Otherwise we will end up with lots of data traced with incorrect offsets. You mean, like the TIGER import? *duck* signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ josm-dev mailing list

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/25/2010 12:27 PM, Ian Dees wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Paul Johnson baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org wrote: On 11/24/2010 04:44 AM, Frederick Rama wrote: For the end-user, there's no difference in WMS and slippy map anyway, it only confuses them. Well

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/25/2010 01:02 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: I have gone on record in the past saying that JOSM is too bloated (and I'd *still* like to have a really lean version from time to time), but as background layers go, I am really tempted to suggest that we try to hijack one of the existing Open

Re: [josm-dev] Microsoft gains access to aerial imagery

2010-11-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/23/2010 01:35 PM, Tobias Wendorff wrote: Now it's up to us to make the WMS-/Yahoo-plugin read Bing-tiles :-) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb259689.aspx Eh, I'll be happy if I can mapproxy that. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [josm-dev] More wms at the same time

2010-10-07 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/06/2010 10:12 AM, Irene Pucci wrote: Hi! Do you know if there is the possibility to load more wms layers in one click and not to select all the wms that I need one by one from the list? If they're on the same server, sure. JOSM can now

Re: [josm-dev] Mailing list configuration - reply address

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 01:46:32 +0200, Sebastian Klein wrote: All of OSM's lists are also carried on gmane.org as gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.* Not the ones I would be interested in: HOT, legal-general, osmf-talk, potlatch-dev, ... Those are easily enough added; check the gmane faq.

Re: [josm-dev] Mailing list configuration - reply address

2010-08-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:52:38 +0200, Sebastian Klein wrote: Hi, who is managing the mailing list? I would appreciate, if mails sent to the list would have Reply-To: josm-dev@openstreetmap.org in the header. This way you can answer more easily to the list. Reply-To: is a human-only

Re: [josm-dev] Mailing list configuration - reply address

2010-08-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:57:04 +0200, Simone Cortesi wrote: a reply-to sent directly to the user is there just to prevent somebody sending a personal mail to the whole list. any sufficiently advanced mailer has a reply to all button. People who are reading the list don't need two copies of

Re: [OSM-dev] aviation maps?

2010-08-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:28:10 +0100, Chris Hill wrote: The general aviation charts I have are all copyright. The Jeppesen books of airport layouts, approaches, circuit patterns, radio frequencies etc are certainly copyright and not available for use in OSM without written permission. FAA

Re: [OSM-dev] aviation maps?

2010-08-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:28:10 +0100, Chris Hill wrote: The general aviation charts I have are all copyright. The Jeppesen books of airport layouts, approaches, circuit patterns, radio frequencies etc are certainly copyright and not available for use in OSM without written permission. FAA

Re: [OSM-dev] aviation maps?

2010-08-11 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:11:09 +0200, Ákos Maróy wrote: Hi, I'm new to OpenStreetMaps, and I'm not sure if this is the right forum to ask questions about this topic. I saw an initiative about airspace mapping here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Airspace I wonder

Re: [OSM-dev] Cartagen Knitter TMS, GeoTiff, can be used with JOSM

2010-08-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:14:50 +0400, Jeffrey Warren wrote: Therefore you can now use aerial images from balloons or kites (or whatever! slingshots!) to stitch a map, then export it for printing or import it into many other geospatial tools. All in the browser, no plugins. I'm wondering if we

Re: [josm-dev] Change to changeset comment handling, RfD

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:46:30 +0200, Sebastian Klein wrote: I would vote for keeping the changeset open by default. If the user changes the changeset comment or other tags on subsequent upload, it should ask if a new changeset should be started. I find this arrangement to be overly cumbersome

Re: [OSM-dev] USGS fork of OpenStreetMap

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:27:49 -0600, Eric Wolf wrote: An initial project has started at the USGS to explore using the OSM stack to facilitate our data integration and, eventually, involve more user generated content (i.e., give a home to The National Map Corps). The project is currently titled

Re: [josm-dev] Manual zoom JOSM

2010-07-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:18:20 +0200, André Riedel wrote: 2010/7/17 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org: On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:59:55 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote: Keypad+ and Keypad- zoom in and out.  Whether that's easy or not is another question. I'd love it if ctrl up/ctrl down worked outside

Re: [josm-dev] Manual zoom JOSM

2010-07-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:34:43 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/7/9 Shaun McDonald o...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk: Heh, this has just come up as a usability issue discussion at SOTM, as there is no way to be able to be able to easily zoom without a scroll wheel. a touchpad is also working

Re: [josm-dev] Manual zoom JOSM

2010-07-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:59:55 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote: Keypad+ and Keypad- zoom in and out. Whether that's easy or not is another question. I'd love it if ctrl up/ctrl down worked outside the Download dialogue. I'm on a laptop: No keypad, no wheel.

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:09:43 -0400, Anthony wrote: When I lived in New Jersey it was the same way, and I'd imagine it's the same way in most of the United States. I'd say more research is needed before we call that conclusive. At least in Oregon and Washington, street boundaries often extend

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:23:54 +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Mapping also means generalizing. This means you do NOT map what is EXACTLY on the ground, but you map what it means and is sensible. Art generalizes. Cartography is a science. ___ josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-06 Thread Paul Johnson
Pieren wrote: On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Teemu Koskinen teemu.koski...@mbnet.fiwrote: Definitely not, IMO the warning should be elevated to an error, when dealing with wide linear features (roads, rivers, etc.). If you go that way, drawing a road or a river with a polyline should

Re: [josm-dev] self-intersecting ways

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Johnson
Alan Mintz wrote: A similar problem exists with some landuse=* ways that people have glued to roads. I'd call that a bit of an error: Clearly that landuse doesn't continue all the way out to the street centerline. ___ josm-dev mailing list

Re: [josm-dev] restart JOSM

2009-12-16 Thread Paul Johnson
Kirill Bestoujev wrote: Hi! How do you think a shell script will work in Windows??? Well, the windows world has their proprietary BAT files, so a shell script could be ported. Would be nice if Microsoft would join us in the third millennium and drop their VMS-based OS offerings in favor of

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention

2009-12-10 Thread Paul Johnson
Lennard wrote: Paul Johnson wrote: created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in favor of Potlatch. You would be correct

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM is the editor with the best user retention

2009-12-08 Thread Paul Johnson
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: interesting post by Matt on this blog: http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2009/12/editor-retention/ He arrives at the result that JOSM users are the ones most likely to stay with their editor. (Well... what else is

Re: [OSM-dev] webkit-image debian package

2009-09-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 10:51 +0200, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: I created a debian packageing for webkit-image qt for my ubuntu install http://filebin.ca/asrwtb/webkitimageqt-dev.tgz please tell me how to submit a patch or changes for inclusion upstream.

Re: [OSM-dev] A new way to split the planet

2009-08-15 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:07 +0200, Nic Roets wrote: 3. Use an OO spreadsheet to choose the rectangles (density4.ods). OO will makes it quite easy: As you drag to highlight a rectangle, it will display the sum (of nodes) in the status bar. This way you can see how much data will be in the

Re: [OSM-dev] finding OSM users by their home locations

2009-05-31 Thread Paul Johnson
Matt Amos wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote: On May 31, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Matt Amos wrote: if we want to keep the map on the users' pages showing the nearest other users to them, we might as well offer this data publicly. as russ said, it's one

Re: [OSM-dev] finding OSM users by their home locations

2009-05-31 Thread Paul Johnson
Tom Hughes wrote: Emilie Laffray wrote: I guess it all depends on whether the users have accepted to make public their location. I am not sure whether the site allows to decide whether to make public or not your location. Well first of all we don't require anybody to give their location

Re: [OSM-dev] finding OSM users by their home locations

2009-05-31 Thread Paul Johnson
Matt Amos wrote: in my opinion it's evil to contact users who haven't opted in to be contacted. it's a valid point of view that they implicitly opted in, but i don't think this is what most users intended when they added a home location - it's certainly not what i intended. I'm not sure it's

Re: [josm-dev] homepage down

2009-05-28 Thread Paul Johnson
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: looks as if there is some problem on the Josm-Startpage (online): http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ Why is it so darn hard to revert in Trac compared to Mediawiki, anyway? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [josm-dev] homepage down

2009-05-28 Thread Paul Johnson
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2009, Paul Johnson wrote: Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: looks as if there is some problem on the Josm-Startpage (online): http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ Why is it so darn hard to revert in Trac compared to Mediawiki, anyway? Well, it is not. You need

Re: [OSM-dev] Guys I trusted you, I removed my checks...

2009-05-18 Thread Paul Johnson
Stefan de Konink wrote: but again this trust was misplaced. No, it is not Potlatch 0.9a, it cannot be Potlatch is the perfect user tool and introduction to OSM. It must be API 0.6 that didn't solve all our problems, as was promised. Instead but it opened the gates of hell, a parallel

Re: [OSM-dev] Bittorrent

2009-04-18 Thread Paul Johnson
Max wrote: just a question of setting the standard. 1) I'm not sure one who doesn't follow the established standards set by English and common email convention of making the conversation flow in chronological order rather than random reverse order when quoting other people has much room to speak

Re: [OSM-dev] Bittorrent

2009-04-17 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan de Konink wrote: After a few upload problems, a new torrent is available. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Planet.osm#Bittorrent Not to nitpick, but in terms of PR, might it be better to use a tracker other than The Pirate Bay?