Thanks, Wendy. Seems to have worked like a charm.
Downloading the docs worked just great too. Thanks again.
-Ted.
On 1/17/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/16/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.0.3 build is uploading now, and I'll post the Maven stuff later tonight.
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/m2-staging-repository
The http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/ seems to be created
and populated, but is not accessible from the web.
- Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Try it now.
On 1/17/07, Erik Bertelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/ seems to be created
and populated, but is not accessible from the web.
- Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
2007/1/17, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try it now.
well, it gives:
wget http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/struts-2.0.3-lib.zip
--16:47:42-- http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.3/struts-2.0.3-lib.zip
= `struts-2.0.3-lib.zip'
Resolving people.apache.org...
For some reason, the permissions on the ZIP files were different than
the others, but they should all be world readable now.
On 1/17/07, Erik Bertelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/1/17, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try it now.
well, it gives:
wget
I've added a 'release' profile with maven-gpg-plugin configuration to
both the struts1 and struts2 parent poms.
When you're deploying to the m2-staging-repository directory, activate
the profile with
-P release
and supply your passphrase with
-Dpassphrase=My Pass Phrase
(This can also be
On 1/17/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Wendy. Seems to have worked like a charm.
Great!
Then it looks like the only thing missing is signatures for all the
jars and poms in the repository. Let me know if you need help
scripting that... or, I posted about gpg plugin config
I'm still not setup to sign the Maven artifiacts. I'm preparing for a
trip, and I can't be sure that I'll have time to look at it before I
leave. If someone else could take care of it, that would be great.
Otherwise I'll figure it out when I get back on the 28th.
The major problem is that my SSL
I didn't see a branch for 2.0.x Are we going to create it right before
we commit big 2.1.x features? I like not having the branch for now, as
I'm mostly working on bug fixes that should go into 2.0.4
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I'm still not setup to sign the Maven artifiacts. I'm preparing for
Someone wasn't paying attention. :)
If we need to do bug fixes on 2.0.3, we'll branch off the tag--otherwise
we won't create the branch. Trunk became 2.1.x after the 2.0.3 tag.
Tom
Don Brown wrote:
I didn't see a branch for 2.0.x Are we going to create it right
before we commit big 2.1.x
Well, considering most/all of the work in the next few weeks will be
going into bug fixes for 2.0.x, I'd really like to not have to remember
all of them and apply them to two places. Including the fact that many
fixes are applicable to WebWork 2.2.x, that would make it three places
the fix
We can always branch at 2.0.3 if we need a 2.0.4, or at whatever
revision if we haven't started on the 2.1.x features yet. I just
didn't see the point of creating the branch until we were sure we
needed it. If we want to constrain our efforts to the 2.0.x list, then
we could also swap the head
Is there a plan on when the performance issues with Struts 2.0 will be
resolved? In some thread I saw that struts community is trying to either
create a replaceable EL engine or improve OGNL performance. But nowhere,
I see a committed timeline on when this will be done or whether this is
being
The performance of OGNL is not nearly as bad as we had originally
thought. I've been doing some performance testing in Webwork (which S2
is based on) this week and most of the OGNL calls are not measurable.
(1ms) The biggest issue I've had is making sure freemarker templates
are getting
The test build of Struts 1.3.6 is now available.
No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
Struts 1.3.6 has been made, and at this time it is simply a test
build. We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
feedback into account if a quality vote is called for
15 matches
Mail list logo
