On 1/18/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the possibilities I was discussing with Phil yesterday was to
implement freemarker caching on the WW side of things--just like we do
with OGNL. In WW if we're not in devMode, then I think its safe to say
that we can read the template
Do you do anything special, like extract the templates?
Are these public applications? Can we name names?
-Ted.
On 1/18/07, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been running WebWork 2 in quite a few production applications for a
couple years and have seen no related performance problems.
Obviously you picked up on my probing questions on the chat. :) Yes--we
use JSP's with FTL templates for the tags. It only recently occurred to
me that the caching would need to be different for the FTL tag templates
vs. FTL results. I like this proposal--it would keep the user from
having
On 1/19/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously you picked up on my probing questions on the chat. :) Yes--we
use JSP's with FTL templates for the tags. It only recently occurred to
me that the caching would need to be different for the FTL tag templates
vs. FTL results. I like
Well, I went ahead and implemented this tonight:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1661
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1417
It turns out that FreemarkerTemplateEngine.java is only used by the UI
tags. The freemarker result hooks into freemarker via the
FreemarkerManager. I
Even though this is for WW, almost all of it is applicable to Struts 2.
This is a key phrase. There are a lot of very successful WW
deployments out there, with the same performance levels.
We really need to setup our own benchmarks, so that we can run them
with the templates deployed. I'd love
One of the possibilities I was discussing with Phil yesterday was to
implement freemarker caching on the WW side of things--just like we do
with OGNL. In WW if we're not in devMode, then I think its safe to say
that we can read the template once and never reread it. This would
eliminate the
We've been running WebWork 2 in quite a few production applications for a
couple years and have seen no related performance problems. And we're very
particular about performance. I wouldn't worry about it.
Bob
On 1/17/07, Shekhar Yadav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a plan on when the
On 1/18/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(And hopefully some of those will
lend us a hand. Even with the merge, we still don't have more active
committers than we had a year ago.)
Sorry, Ted--I really should contribute more. I've been investing a lot of
time in Guice.
Bob
Is there a plan on when the performance issues with Struts 2.0 will be
resolved? In some thread I saw that struts community is trying to either
create a replaceable EL engine or improve OGNL performance. But nowhere,
I see a committed timeline on when this will be done or whether this is
being
The performance of OGNL is not nearly as bad as we had originally
thought. I've been doing some performance testing in Webwork (which S2
is based on) this week and most of the OGNL calls are not measurable.
(1ms) The biggest issue I've had is making sure freemarker templates
are getting
11 matches
Mail list logo
