Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Claus Ibsen
Bob this is really a great list for doing some house cleaning. - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26278messageID=52211#52211

RE: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Lee Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:56 PM To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0 On 4/18/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would tend to

RE: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Pilgrim, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a new user of WebWork 2.2 I dont see much of XWork except for the xwork.xml file. So I agree totally. This is not to say that as an advanced user, one day I might decide to exploit an XWork feature. Actions itself, parameter setting /

svn commit: r395261 - in /struts/site/src/site: fml/roadmap.fml site.xml xdoc/index.xml

2006-04-19 Thread husted
Author: husted Date: Wed Apr 19 08:10:52 2006 New Revision: 395261 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395261view=rev Log: Update roadmap FAQ to mention new plans for Action 1.3.x. Add obsolete Q/A. Add links to Strecks and Stripes. Modified: struts/site/src/site/fml/roadmap.fml

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by JasonCarreira

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by JasonCarreira: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- 1. We

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by JasonCarreira

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by JasonCarreira: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots --

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Jason Carreira
I've added my comments inline... As an aside, any chance of us getting Confluence set up? It's painful going back to a regular wiki :-) On 4/18/06, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll set up the rough spots page. http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show Bob

Rough Spots (was: XWork and Struts Action 2.0)

2006-04-19 Thread Gabe
Also, should we seperate these issues as XWork and SAF issues? The XWork issues can just be entered into XWork JIRA and linked to from this page. (Some are already there). Then, this page can serve as a list of the critical issues before release. - Original Message From: Jason

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of RoughSpots by Bob Lee

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: fixed comment formatting so numbers stay intact.

svn commit: r395332 - in /incubator/webwork2: action/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/action2/components/ action/src/main/resources/org/apache/struts/action2/static/richtexteditor/ action/src/main/reso

2006-04-19 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Wed Apr 19 11:10:17 2006 New Revision: 395332 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395332view=rev Log: Switching to dojo's rich text editor, removing old directories Removed: incubator/webwork2/action/src/main/resources/org/apache/struts/action2/static/richtexteditor/

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Patrick Lightbody
OK, I read this whole thread and will provide my general comments here and my specific comments about Bob's wiki entry on the wiki itself. First, we need to recognize there are a few different proposals here: 1) Drop XW directly in to WW (ie: fork). This is Bob's proposal. 2) Move XW over to

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by Bob Lee

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: Responses to Jason's comments.

svn commit: r395338 - /incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt

2006-04-19 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Wed Apr 19 11:23:27 2006 New Revision: 395338 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395338view=rev Log: Updating status Modified: incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt Modified: incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt URL:

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by GabrielZimmerman

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by GabrielZimmerman: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots --

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by MichaelJouravlev

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: XML-free configuration if JDK 1.5 is the target

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Don Brown
Patrick Lightbody wrote: We can definitely start by reading struts.xml rather than xwork.xml. +1, works great with struts-default.xml Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Ted Husted
We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where OpenSymphony - Apache Struts WebWork - Action A good reason to prefer action-default.xml to struts-default.xml is that we want people to be able to use Struts Action 1 and Struts Action 2 in the same application

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Bob Lee
I vote for struts-action.xml. Bob On 4/19/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where OpenSymphony - Apache Struts WebWork - Action A good reason to prefer action-default.xml to struts-default.xml is that we want

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Don Brown
Bob Lee wrote: I vote for struts-action.xml. +1 Don Bob On 4/19/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where OpenSymphony - Apache Struts WebWork - Action A good reason to prefer action-default.xml to

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread James Mitchell
+1 to your +1 -- James Mitchell On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Don Brown wrote: Bob Lee wrote: I vote for struts-action.xml. +1 Don Bob On 4/19/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where OpenSymphony -

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Ian Roughley
+1 for struts-action.xml Bob Lee wrote: I vote for struts-action.xml. Bob On 4/19/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where OpenSymphony - Apache Struts WebWork - Action A good reason to prefer

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by plightbo

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by plightbo: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- } }}} +

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by DonBrown

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- *

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by Bob Lee

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- *

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Ricardo Lecheta
+1 for struts-action.xml - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26278messageID=52352#52352 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Claus Ibsen
+1 struts-action.xml - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26278messageID=52373#52373 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[Struts Wiki] Update of RoughSpots by GabrielZimmerman

2006-04-19 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by GabrielZimmerman: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- *

svn commit: r395420 - /incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt

2006-04-19 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Wed Apr 19 15:51:33 2006 New Revision: 395420 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395420view=rev Log: Updating and removing resolved issues Modified: incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt Modified: incubator/webwork2/STATUS.txt URL:

Re: XWork and Struts Action 2.0

2006-04-19 Thread Bob Lee
On 4/19/06, Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Drop XW directly in to WW (ie: fork). This is Bob's proposal. Just to clarify what I already said on the wiki page, I propose that we make XWork an implementation detail, not part of our API. This means creating a thin abstraction layer

Re: [shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?)

2006-04-19 Thread Sean Schofield
I'd love to see Shale move to M2. I'll try to help with the limited Maven knowledge that I have gleaned from the MyFaces experience. I'd recommend starting out with a proposed hierarchy and set of artifiacts as a starting point. See if we can get the basics squared away first before sweating