DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36968] - jasper2 Ant task fails when executed more than once

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36968. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26979] - StandardServer don't save cluster config

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26979. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35916] - Session listeners not called on cluster server restart

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35916. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r326837 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2005-10-20 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Wed Oct 19 23:23:59 2005 New Revision: 326837 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326837view=rev Log: Now sessionCreated is send after node get sessions from backup. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27259] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.ReplicationListener tcpListenAddress

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34647] - Tomcat cluster - Unable to receive message through TCP Channel

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34647. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r326850 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session/DeltaSession.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2005-10-20 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Thu Oct 20 00:34:58 2005 New Revision: 326850 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326850view=rev Log: Fix bug 34984 HttpSessionBindingEvent.getValue() get now correct value Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34984] - HttpSessionBindingEvent.getName() returns null in cluster and distributal

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34984. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34984] - HttpSessionBindingEvent.getName() returns null in cluster and distributal

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34984. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-20 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Seems there is low interest on JK 1.2.15 although it resolves lots of issues compared with released 1.2.14.1 :( So far, seems only Henri voted +1 (I hope I read his vote properly). Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm missing? If not,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37164] - JkShmFile Directive and jk-runtime-status

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37164. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36681. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37054] - NoClassDefFoundError using ServletContextListener

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r326935 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml

2005-10-20 Thread yoavs
Author: yoavs Date: Thu Oct 20 09:28:06 2005 New Revision: 326935 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326935view=rev Log: A bit more marketing pizzazz. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html URL:

Re: Sandbox ?

2005-10-20 Thread Costin Manolache
Thanks ! I'll add few things I've worked on in the past - if people don't mind, I'll create a sandbox/java and put everything in one tree, ant and IDEs are smart enough to exclude/include different packages. Let me know if any of this seems wrong: - a smaller commons-logging impl, without any

Help: Off topic big picture Question (Xforms vs JFS) ??

2005-10-20 Thread Bovy, Stephen J
Can anyone out there give me some opinion or perspective or web links that explain how Xforms and JFS fit together in the big picture, (I.E.) yes, they are complementary and they do fit together no, they conflict and are separate competing technologies Thanks in advance for any

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm missing? I'll try to find cycles to test myself, next week. I know I'm having alot of trouble with the apache 1.3 build on odd architectures, probably because the clash of a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37186] New: - blank line at start at start of tomcat-users.xml file leads to failure of UserDatabase

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37186] - blank line at start at start of tomcat-users.xml file leads to failure of UserDatabase

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37100] - SEGV in mod_proxy_ajp

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37186] - blank line at start at start of tomcat-users.xml file leads to failure of UserDatabase

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Tomcat fails to service requests after period of time

2005-10-20 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev lists
try your same test case with mod_proxy, after that switch to the tomcat user list Steve Gaunt wrote: HI, Has anyone else had any issue using mod_jk under heavy load.. It seems after a period of time(or large no. opf requests) under heavy load AJP connetor just hangs. It's crazy. All

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-20 Thread David Rees
On 10/20/05, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems there is low interest on JK 1.2.15 although it resolves lots of issues compared with released 1.2.14.1 :( Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm missing? I found 1.2.15 to be stable under

Error

2005-10-20 Thread alex
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Error

2005-10-20 Thread alex
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37186] - blank line at start at start of tomcat-users.xml file leads to failure of UserDatabase

2005-10-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Tomcat 5.5.12 common/lib jars and classpath

2005-10-20 Thread Brad O'Hearne
I just configured a JAASRealm and a login module for it that authenticates users. I've gotten that to work just fine. But in the process I discovered something very strange. My loging module relies on mail.jar, the JavaMail API. I put my login module and its dependency jars into the common/lib

Bug in RealmBase, JAASRealm, and/or Requestt object preventing proper role authorization

2005-10-20 Thread Brad O'Hearne
All, I have discovered a bug in role authorization when using a JAASRealm and custom user / role principals. In a nutshell, successful authentication in the JAASRealm over a custom JAAS login module results in the JAASRealm pulling the user principal and role principals out of the