DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26979.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35916.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: pero
Date: Wed Oct 19 23:23:59 2005
New Revision: 326837
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326837view=rev
Log:
Now sessionCreated is send after node get sessions from backup.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: pero
Date: Thu Oct 20 00:34:58 2005
New Revision: 326850
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326850view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 34984
HttpSessionBindingEvent.getValue() get now correct value
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34984.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Seems there is low interest on JK 1.2.15 although it resolves
lots of issues compared with released 1.2.14.1 :(
So far, seems only Henri voted +1 (I hope I read his vote
properly).
Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to
be declared as stable that I'm missing?
If not,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37164.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36681.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: yoavs
Date: Thu Oct 20 09:28:06 2005
New Revision: 326935
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326935view=rev
Log:
A bit more marketing pizzazz.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
URL:
Thanks !
I'll add few things I've worked on in the past - if people don't mind,
I'll create a sandbox/java and put everything in one tree, ant and
IDEs are smart enough to exclude/include different packages.
Let me know if any of this seems wrong:
- a smaller commons-logging impl, without any
Can anyone out there give me some opinion or perspective or web links
that explain how Xforms and JFS fit together in the big picture,
(I.E.) yes, they are complementary and they do fit together
no, they conflict and are separate competing technologies
Thanks in advance for any
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to
be declared as stable that I'm missing?
I'll try to find cycles to test myself, next week. I know I'm having
alot of trouble with the apache 1.3 build on odd architectures, probably
because the clash of a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
try your same test case with mod_proxy, after that switch to the tomcat
user list
Steve Gaunt wrote:
HI,
Has anyone else had any issue using mod_jk under heavy load..
It seems after a period of time(or large no. opf requests) under heavy load AJP connetor just hangs. It's crazy.
All
On 10/20/05, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems there is low interest on JK 1.2.15 although it resolves
lots of issues compared with released 1.2.14.1 :(
Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to
be declared as stable that I'm missing?
I found 1.2.15 to be stable under
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
attachment.
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
attachment.
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37186.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I just configured a JAASRealm and a login module for it that authenticates
users. I've gotten that to work just fine. But in the process I discovered
something very strange. My loging module relies on mail.jar, the JavaMail
API. I put my login module and its dependency jars into the common/lib
All,
I have discovered a bug in role authorization when using a JAASRealm and
custom user / role principals. In a nutshell, successful authentication in
the JAASRealm over a custom JAAS login module results in the JAASRealm
pulling the user principal and role principals out of the
28 matches
Mail list logo