Hi,
for questions about the windowing system layer you should ask on
dev@gsl.openoffice.org,
Martin
Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi,
still on the OS2 port, I have an open issue with native window sizing
and positioning.
When a window is moved using Os2SalFrame::SetPosSize, it seems to me
that new
participants: Ause, Kai Backmann, Michael Bemmer, Stephan Bergmann, Nils
Fuhrmann, Martin Hollmichel, Matthias Huetsch, Heiner Rechtien, Juergen
Schmidt.
Kai B. provided some information about his investigation in the OOo
build System. The main thesis he presented was that the overall build
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
participants: Ause, Kai Backmann, Michael Bemmer, Stephan Bergmann, Nils
Fuhrmann, Martin Hollmichel, Matthias Huetsch, Heiner Rechtien, Juergen
Schmidt.
Joerg Jahnke and Malte Timmermann also participated in that meeting,
...
sorry for that,
Martin
Hi,
I'm playing a similar game with a preconfigured environment
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/O3-build) and have the same
problem with g++-3.4.1 and binutils-2.17 and no problem with g++-4.1.1
and binutils-2.17.
Is there a recommended binutils version if I would like to have the
Is there a recommended binutils version if I would like to have the
option to choose between both compiler versions. Or might it be a better
idea to configure the compiler with a specific binutils version ?
It's always a good idea to configure gcc to the specific binutils you
plan to
Hi,
Vitor Domingos wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to build only on RPM for the Linux install, rather than the
multiple rpms and desktop-integration ? This has been a glitch on linux
installations.
I think you mean one rpm instead of having a whole bunch of them ?
AFAIK this is not possible,
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:27 PM
The next major steps for this project are:
* make it also possible for the Windows platform
That would be just great!!
This will be not so easy
Hi,
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Git page, mainly the
times of checkout/merge/etc.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Git#Comparison
Thank you for the comparision. I think some rows in the table need some
more explanation (e.g.
Hi,
I just stumbled about how to use git in our corporate network (tried
freecap on Windows) and failed.
I wondered then at all if a distributed SCM makes sense at all if many
developers are located in corporate networks, so access to distributed
repositories might be difficult or need extra
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 11:12, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I wondered then at all if a distributed SCM makes sense at all if many
developers are located in corporate networks, so access to distributed
repositories might be difficult or need extra infrastructure.
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Jan Holesovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I enable http:// access to go-oo.org/git?
Dunno what went wrong for Martin - I was able to clone your repo from
within Sun.
which platform did you use, I was trying on Windows,
Martin
Some of the clones might be public, eg. ooo-build.
if people agree on a push back, only some of the clones needs to be
public, if this should be a pull back public access gets a problem.
so right now it is no problem to access a cws which has not been
integrated yet and can e.g. do
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 15:48, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Some of the clones might be public, eg. ooo-build.
if people agree on a push back, only some of the clones needs to be
public, if this should be a pull back public access gets a problem.
so right now
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
As mentioned in an earlier post, I'm trying out o3-build within a
minimal chroot install.
That chroot has no X11 installed, so it relies on the stuff o3-build
provides.
The build breaks at bean module, because checkdll cannot find various
X-libraries.
When
Hi Kay,
just found as information in other patch issue a reference to project
which also is doing source code analysis: http://oopp.multiracio.com/
I think we probably should also list them in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Other_Tools
Martin
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi Kay
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Eg. the spellchecker (hunspell) itself is in the lingucomponent which I
propose to put to ooo-apps-extensions (and thus to ship it together with the
application). The dictionaries for it are in ooo-libs-3rdparty/dictionaries
- the distros have their own packages, but it
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Friday 12 October 2007 20:18, Mathias Bauer wrote:
just stumbled about that the report design extension is built during the
regular build process, wouldn't it be better at all to create a source
tarball include jfreereport and reportdesign modules. Where
are welcome.
Vladimir
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
I just found at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOo30_release_engineering_planned_changes
that we plan to change the export by ordinal for windows. What is
planned for OOo 3.0 ? Export by name or by alias ? Can you elaborate
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
There are also the Windows (Platform SDK's, also available as free
download)
* v5.0 ( just SDK header and Libraries)
* v6.0 comes additionally with the C/C++ Compiler 14.00.50727 for x86
* v6.1 comes addtionally with the C/C++ Compiler 15.00.20706 for x86
please see issue 87925 for this,
Martin
Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build dev300_m6 on Linux Debian lenny.
It stops while building the module filter with:
Building packages others
../../../unxlngi6.pro/misc/filters/fcfg_drawgraphics.others_flag
Guido Ostkamp wrote:
Hello,
State of the OOo SCM project
We plan to switch over to Subversion in the second half of July.
the second half of July is nearly over and I haven't heard any news
regarding the final switch to SVN since that discussion in early June.
Heiner,
will there be any additional tools or documentation necessary of will
our cws tools will wrap this completly ?
Martin
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
an updated repository acording to
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Scm_migration_scope) is
avaiable via:
svn checkout
I also already wondered about xsltfilter10, Kurt wanted to do some
investigation on how this could happen,
Martin
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
several cws have been resynced to an invalid master milestone, namely
OOO300 line with m23, m28, m29 for example.
Those masters don't exist yet
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
Hi,
due to the trunk-only migration mentioned below, we do no longer have
a dependency on the first release candidate of OOo 3.0, which is done
on the OOO300 branch. At the same time, Heiner is ready to start the
migration. So do we want to start the migration now i.e.
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Email notifications can be implemented with the post-commit hook. We'll
implement that.
Is there any help needed with this ? Since life is now in the svn
repository we need this,
Heiner
Martin
Stefan Taxhet wrote:
Hi,
will we see email
Hi *,
The ESC meeting agreed more than a year ago to migrate OpenOffice.org's
version control from CVS via subversion towards an distributed source
code managment (DSCM) system. The ESC is also in agreement that right
now git and mercurial are both systems which are able to fulfil the
Alan,
for this question I would ask Ingo on the d...@installation list.
may I ask for the motivation to include the pdf import extension by
default ?
Martin
Alan Yaniger wrote:
Hi list-members,
I'm trying to add the PDF import extension to my Windows build of OOo
3.1. It's causing the
Per Eriksson wrote:
Hello,
Maybe we should change the Source code link in EIS2 to point here
instead?
http://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/
I would like to remove this links in EIS in general, looks like another
redundant entry point,
Martin
This page (as far as I know) provides more
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Martin Hollmichel mh at openoffice.org writes:
I would like to remove this links in EIS in general, looks like another
redundant entry point,
While we at that, could we also remove the Administration section? It only
contains broken links.
at least for me
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
time to start the OOo Mercurial pilot. Please find the details here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Mercurial_Pilot
unfortunately I didn't find any time yet to join the pilot, do I have
still have some time to participate ?
But anyhow, I have read
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Heiner,
On Friday 28 August 2009, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Please contact me if you have problems, suggestions etc.
Actually, I have a suggestion ;-)
Do you think - with the switch to Mercurial - would it be possible to stop
using the 'CWS' and 'MWS'
Hi,
obviously OOo doesn't compile any longer with gcc3, see
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95511, should we now
officially drop gcc3 ?
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
All,
I got a request to do some funding for a Windows build bot (to be funded
be the OOo project, not by Sun as my mail adress suggest). build bots
are now integrated in the EIS and are of invaluable help for development
and QA.
I can think of several scenarios:
minimal buildbot: a virtual
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:19:55 +0200
Martin Hollmichel martin.hollmic...@sun.com wrote:
All,
I got a request to do some funding for a Windows build bot (to be
funded be the OOo project, not by Sun as my mail adress suggest).
build
Herter, S. wrote:
If you are going to do the build bot as a virtual machine, would it be possible
to make the VM image(s) available to third parties?
In theory this should be possible if you have the required licenses for
those images. But I personally have not enough knowledge about the MS
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
finally I come to the following proposal:
1 virtual machine running a Windows7 64bit instance with Visual Studio
Standard installed for the Windows tinderbox.
2 additional virtual windows machines available for Developers, with
the Express Version installed
Hi,
I think it's cleaner, and there's definitely not much (should I say
any?) redundancy left. Additionally, one can enhance the script to
generate makefiles for pretty much every make tool of this world,
including eclipse/netbeans/visual studio project files.
I would like to point out
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org wrote:
functionality? Even if CMake eventually turns out to be too slow,
would it not make more sense to write your own custom CMake back
end rather than the
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@sun.com wrote:
I started some time ago a cmake prototype for OOo in my spare time
(http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/mh6bc/) for the latest status
please see the latest ReadMe.txt in the Source
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@sun.com wrote:
yes, thank you, I used and modified some of your work (add_idl_db and
build_rdb_from db functions) and added a more modules (up to rsc now).
A word of warning: the functions I
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
There's also the dmake
- cmake converter script so you don't have to keep writing the files
by hand.
from what I've learned from cmake so far, it seems the best idea to do
an 1:1 conversion since this might lead to too much targets (and thus
dependencies
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@sun.com wrote:
one problem right now is that the usage of linker mapfiles (e.g.
sal/util/sal.map) are not straight supported by cmake, unfortunately all
the
creation of several win32 import libraries
Jussi Pakkanen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@sun.com wrote:
usually I analyse the build logs for understanding these kind of mechanisms,
here's my extract for sal module on Linux:
...
tr -d \015 sal.map | awk -f ./solenv/bin/addsym.awk
On 22.06.2010 16:52, Philipp Lohmann wrote:
Hi,
On 6/22/10 2:49 PM, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
That's exactly what Stephan said: bureaucratic humbug.
Well I know we do have some members in an
On 23.06.2010 00:13, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 22.06.2010 14:49, Bernd Eilers wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
the right solution would be to remove the check. A target milestone
is a hint when a particular should be fixed or is planned to be fixed.
The same is true for a CWS. If a
45 matches
Mail list logo
