: 2.0 M4 release?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'll think about other improvements and add here if I remember others.
Please just update the file directly.
...ant
I don't think we should put off M4 any longer so I'm going to start on
it tomorrow and try to get an RC out by the end of the week. Shout now
if you've any big changes that you'd like to get in before I do this.
...ant
You've done a bunch of changes to trunk overnight, do you want those
the decision to you if you want to merge or not.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:29 AM
To: Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com
Cc: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0 M4 release?
I don't think we
--
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:29 AM
To: Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com
Cc: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0 M4 release?
I don't think we should put off M4 any longer so I'm going to start on
it tomorrow and try to get an RC
If anyone has any changes or additions they would like included in the
CHANGES file for the M4 release please update it now (today). It
currently has for M4:
Highlights include:
- Passes the OASIS conformance test suite for the SCA-J CAA Specification!
- Almost passes the OASIS conformance test
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
If anyone has any changes or additions they would like included in the
CHANGES file for the M4 release please update it now (today). It
currently has for M4:
Highlights include:
- Passes the OASIS conformance test suite
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll think about other improvements and add here if I remember others.
Please just update the file directly.
...ant
--
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:08 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0 M4 release?
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'll think about other improvements and add
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:42 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a
bit of time for everyone to make a bit of progress on what they're
working
+1
Simon
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:19 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Its
+1
Simon
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
Ok, how I take an M4 branch towards the end of next week, that gives a
bit of time for everyone to make a bit of progress on what they're
working on and still gives enough time to make sure M4 gets out before
the end of the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:19 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be
thinking about
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be
thinking about another release? We probably have enough content now -
the Assembly
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be
thinking about another release? We probably have enough content now -
the Assembly otests are nearly all passing, the're a new JSONP
binding, and the dynamic
Its been nearly 6 weeks since the 2.0 M3 release so should we be
thinking about another release? We probably have enough content now -
the Assembly otests are nearly all passing, the're a new JSONP
binding, and the dynamic domain is starting to come together. So would
a M4 in a couple of weeks be
18 matches
Mail list logo
