honestly, i have as little motivation to work
on that as i have had to work on/use event handlers (which isn't
much). really, without some refinement and championing, this is
unlikely to happen.
WILL
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is the list
ok folks, here's a build for Engine 1.6-beta.
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta1/
please kick the tires and report any nitpicks soon. assuming no one
sees any problems, i'll call for a release vote in a few days. with
luck, that vote will close early next week, and i
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: cbrisson
Date: Thu Sep 4 02:06:22 2008
New Revision: 691943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=691943view=rev
Log:
Some work for the #define directive:
- #defined references can now be used anywhere (as #set RHS or as
ok. after weeks of wrestling with gump to find out what the failures
are about, this last build gave some decent info.
See:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/velocity-engine/velocity-engine-test/gump_work/build_velocity-engine_velocity-engine-test.html
I think this section shows the main
the subset() method (and therefore, us) is entirely reliant
upon.
i'll ping the commons list
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok. after weeks of wrestling with gump to find out what the failures
are about, this last build gave some decent info.
See:
http
for the gump tips, though, they may come in handy in the
future. :)
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I kept both Velocity lists in CC, even though I'm not subscribed to
either, we'll see how moderator approval turn out 8-)9
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL
this to the mirrors and begin struggling to update the web site that
afternoon. Of course, recent history indicates that there's really no
telling when i'll actually succeed with that last part and be able to
announce the release.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok folks
but will poke and prod this
one.
July 3 is more than 72 hours away. Time to flip your calendar. :-)
WILL
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote
I suppose i should officially vote too... +1!
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote...
The test build is still available here:
http
expected. it's been there a long
time, i've never cared.
Ciao
Henning
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 10:24 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote...
The test build is still available here
The last test build for 1.6-beta1 failed due to some missing license headers.
It's been replaced by a new build for Engine 1.6-beta, this one based
on revision 693911.
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta1/
please kick the tires and report any other nitpicks soon. you don't
I don't know offhand of an easy way to make things more JSP/FM-ish,
and honestly, i don't love the tag-type syntax. So i'm pretty
unmotivated there. As for performance, i think they could clean that
up w/o requiring us to implement new features. They would just need
to give up the tag-ish
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Will Glass-Husain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to pass in a map of parameters?
heh. yeah, why don't they do that?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Christopher Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I was just reminded of the
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Will Glass-Husain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to pass in a map of parameters?
heh. yeah, why don't they do that?
I'm
this to the mirrors and perhaps begin struggling to update the web site that
afternoon. Of course, recent history indicates that there's really no
telling when i'll actually succeed with that last part and be able to
announce the release.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL
+1 from me
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no negative feedback on the 2nd test build (no feedback at all
actually), so i'm moving on to a vote again.
The test build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Christopher Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
#whatever({ 'foo' : 'bar', baz : bat })
I didn't realize that this syntax was possible. I'm still on Velocity
1.4 where, for instance, you can't do this:
#whatever($velocityCount + 1
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nbubna
Date: Wed Sep 17 23:24:13 2008
New Revision: 696572
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696572view=rev
Log:
refactor to bridge the gap between ToolManager and VelocityView with a new
ViewToolManager class for
that for the next release.
it's a bit late for this one; it'll have to be manually handled.
WILL
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 !
Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008 à 11:15 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
The last test build for 1.6-beta1 failed due to some missing
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Will Glass-Husain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Built with JDK 1.5 / ant 1.7 on WinXP.
A question though-- what happened to the Maven pom?
sitting in the source as pom.xml. the engine
The vote has passed and the test build will be released as Velocity
Engine 1.6-beta1.
+1 votes from:
Nathan Bubna
Henning Schmiedehausen
matthijs lambooy
Malcolm Edgar
Erron Austin
Claude Brisson
Will Glass-Husain
No other votes.
i'll push this to the mirrors promptly. announcement will come
, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, in a fit of procrastinating what i should really work on this
morning, i thought i'd try and do a quick update of the site to show
the Tools 2.0-beta1 release, and thus ensure i can update the site on
my new laptop, prior to finalizing (hopefully) the 2.0
errors exactly do you get? Maybe I have some env
variables set differently from you.
I could sudo to your account if you don't mind.
Ciao
Henning
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:26 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote:
this still sucks... henning, do you have any time to help me
The Velocity developers are very pleased to make the first beta
release of Velocity Engine 1.6-beta1 available for download.
This release contains many bugfixes, new features and drastic
performance improvements. Please see the change log
Below is the list of outstanding issues targeted for Velocity 1.6 and
my take on their priority. As you'll notice, i think there are only a
few more that really ought to have some attention before we do a final
1. 6 release. Most of these are things that i'm currently clueless
about or are in
update the state of things. note that the only open bug (excluding
improvements and new features) against the code itself (excluding docs
and build stuff) is VELOCITY-615, which has not yet been confirmed to
still exist in 1.6. not too shabby.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Nathan Bubna
We actually won't even get your patch otherwise. The mailing list
strips most attachments off. Please attach this to a JIRA issue. :)
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but you should create an entry in JIRA:
Oops, just saw that you did. Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We actually won't even get your patch otherwise. The mailing list
strips most attachments off. Please attach this to a JIRA issue. :)
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Claude Brisson
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Byron Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was considering the possibility that references within macros could be
optimized. Given the following:
#macro(foo $a $b)
$a $b
#end
#foo($c $d.e)
Currently both $a $b within the macro are referenced by AST.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Byron Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a sanity check. I tested this with an unmodified checkout from svn:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/engine/trunk
Last Changed Author: nbubna
Last Changed Rev: 700847
Last Changed Date: 2008-10-01
i'll cast my vote for a third party... :)
3) /foo.vm[line aa, column bb]
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Byron Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to submit a patch that changes all the file names and line number
reported in exception to a consistent format. Currently its difficult to
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Byron Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my perusal the way the macro implementation works is that all
parameters passed to a macros are AST, even if they are in quotes. This is
consistent with pass by name. And anyway, if the string was evaluated
before
hmm. i suppose that makes sense... of course, i'm too tired to think
straight right now. let me re-examine this tomorrow.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Byron Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I looked into this some more and here is the deal. This bug was
introduced with VELOCITY-285.
);
+put(context, elementKey, value);
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm. i suppose that makes sense... of course, i'm too tired to think
straight right now. let me re-examine this tomorrow.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Byron Foster [EMAIL
with local scope, which is
currently not the case. I think all of this would lead to more intuitive
behavior that could be clearly described in the Velocity docs, and that users
would not find surprising.
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:01 , Nathan Bubna wrote:
ok, so here's my current thought
ok folks, here's a build for Engine 1.6-beta2.
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta2/
Since 1.6-beta1 there have been many small bugfixes and improvements
and one notable new feature: the runtime.references.strict mode.
Most of these things were contributed by Byron Foster.
this to the mirrors and perhaps begin struggling to update the web site.
With luck i'll announce it on Monday.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok folks, here's a build for Engine 1.6-beta2.
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6-beta2/
Since 1.6-beta1
The Velocity developers are very pleased to make the first beta
release of Velocity Engine 1.6-beta2 available for download.
Since 1.6-beta1 there have been numerous small bugfixes and
improvements, and a new strict reference mode feature. See the
change log
ok folks, i think the time has come; here's a build for Engine 1.6:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6/
please kick the tires and report any and all nitpicks soon. PLEASE
try it out and look for problems. (yes, i am begging!) assuming no
one sees any problems, i'll call for
and here is a test build for Tools 2.0-beta3:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
this should be the last Tools 2.0 beta release, barring any major bugs
appearing. with another push on the documentation front, we should
be able to get 2.0 to final by Christmas.
anyway,
Hmm. It's doesn't seem quite that straightforward to me. Caching
isn't always a parse-all-up-front situation, there are modification
check intervals, and most of all, there are things that can heavily
use evaluate(...) (RenderTool, #evaluate, etc) instead of
getTemplate(...).
This is something
21, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok folks, i think the time has come; here's a build for Engine 1.6:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6/
please kick the tires and report any and all nitpicks soon. PLEASE
try it out and look for problems. (yes, i
Ok, updated again with fix for VELOCITY-649. Same address, same plan.
If Byron (or anyone else) finds more bugs tomorrow, then i'll start
pushing the schedule back. :)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An updated test build including the fix for VELOCITY
n
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An updated test build including the fix for VELOCITY-644 and a couple
minor test/build tweaks is now up at:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6/http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/engine/1.6
on Monday, Dec 1st. If the vote passes, I'll push
this to the mirrors and change the web site and get Henning to deploy it.
With luck i'll be able to announce it by Wed.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok folks, i think the time has come; here's a build for Engine
the web site and get Henning to deploy it.
With luck i'll be able to announce it by Wed.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and here is a test build for Tools 2.0-beta3:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
this should be the last Tools 2.0
+1 from me
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available
+1 from me
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build, so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
Please vote regarding
irrors/maven2/commons-collections/jars/commons-collections-3.2.jar to
C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\Desktop\velocity-tools-2.0-
beta3-src\lib\commons-collections-3.2.jar
Total time: 1 second
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, there were
Ok, i've accepted Will's veto and am changing my vote to -1, so here's
the result for the record:
-1
Nathan Bubna
Will Glass-Husain
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Will. I actually feel like Adrian (or someone) reported this
too, but i forgot
. And please do so before Wednesday morning, as i currently
plan to call for a new vote then. Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and here is a test build for Tools 2.0-beta3:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
this should
, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, i've accepted Will's veto and am changing my vote to -1, so here's
the result for the record:
-1
Nathan Bubna
Will Glass-Husain
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Will. I
Drawing the [VOTE] thread to Henning's attention... :)
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, Will said the new test build works for him; it is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
Please vote regarding your
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron Austin
Will Glass-Husain
Henning Schmiedehausen
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RAT looks good, builds for me with JDK 1.6.0_10 on i386 Linux (Fedora).
+1
Ciao
Shoot. Meant to save that as a draft and send it first thing
tomorrow. Just consider this to have been sent about 12 hours from
now. :) Thanks.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron
are giving essentially a -1 to this procedural
change, i'd appreciate a good reason at the least.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
(And don't end it early even w/ 3 +1s :)
geir
On Nov 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, Will said
Ok, here's the corrected tally, sent at the proper time. :)
+1
Nathan Bubna
matthijs lambooy
Ilkha Priha
Erron Austin
Will Glass-Husain
Henning Schmiedehausen
Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here's the tally:
+1
Nathan Bubna
, at 10:21 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
why not end early? :( i did the initial CFV 72+ hrs ago and only
changed one source file between the initial and secondary votes, and
we have a quorum and clear majority in favor of this beta release. in
fact, there's only one active PMC member who hasn't yet
Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how does letting the vote run the full 3 days vs cutting it off early affect
the site?
geir
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
I fully agree, but we've already had more time than usual for
participation and testing already. The first test
and Henning for that matter, since lately i have had to resort to
asking him to do it after several fruitless attempts.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have to get the velocity-site stuff (home page, download page, etc)
updated for every release i do
thing?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we all know why
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
and Henning for that matter, since lately i have had to resort to
asking him to do it after several fruitless attempts.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008
if anyone else is planning to vote, they've made no indication of it.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone left to vote?
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
ok, we've had this conversation, but until someone takes the time to
remedy
(Ok, Geir, you've stretched me out another day, but i think 4 days for
voting is quite sufficient. :) If someone really has a convincing -1
for this beta in the next 24 hours, i'll buy you lunch next time
you're in Portland.)
So here's the tally for this one...
+1
Nathan Bubna
Will Glass
The Velocity developers are pleased to make the third (and probably
final) beta release of
VelocityTools 2.0 available for download.
Downloads are available here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
This should be useable as a drop in replacement for Tools 1.4 or Tools
2.0-beta2, with a few
://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.6/
The change log is here:
http://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.6/changes-report.html
Apache Velocity 1.6 can be downloaded here:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
For the Apache Velocity Team
Nathan Bubna
if you didn't notice, a vararg method reflection bug (VELOCITY-651)
was found shortly after we got 1.6 released. it is now fixed, and i
think we need to do a bug fix release for it. it's not the sort of
thing that should wait around for a 1.7 release. so, here's a test
build for 1.6.1.
Tomas,
This would be great. Can you create a JIRA issue for this so we don't
lose track of it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY
thanks,
nathan
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Tomas Styblo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the patch that is attached makes it possible to use
Hi Josh,
Yeah, that shouldn't be an NPE. To open a bug report, go to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY and click the Create
New Issue link in the menu bar along the top of that page.
Also, do you still get an NPE if you try it with Velocity 1.6?
thanks,
nathan
On Thu, Dec 4,
perhaps?
no, but that's an interesting idea. if you think that would be more
useful, let me know and perhaps you can help me figure out how that
might/should work. :)
Cheers,
Steve
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Bubna
:58 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
if you didn't notice, a vararg method reflection bug (VELOCITY-651)
was found shortly after we got 1.6 released. it is now fixed, and i
think we need to do a bug fix release for it. it's not the sort of
thing that should wait around for a 1.7 release
+1 (for the record)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the latest 1.6.1 test build, so it
is time to vote:
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine
into the
maven-1 repo. Perhaps some Maven maven has been doing this?
Claude
On mar, 2008-12-02 at 22:01 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
The Velocity developers are pleased to make the third (and probably
final) beta release of
VelocityTools 2.0 available for download.
Downloads are available here:
http
Yeah, if they can set their own uberspect, they should be able to read
the release notes and adapt their uberspect setting if they want to
use this feature.
The more important question to me is whether we want to require Engine
1.6+ for Tools 2.0. This would be the first dependency on Engine
; is this really worth the veto?
from the rat report. Please fix the license and prepare a new build.
Ciao
Henning
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 07:38 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the latest 1.6.1 test build, so it
is time to vote:
The test
The vote has passed:
+1 from
Ilkka Priha
Nathan Bubna
Claude Brisson
Will Glass-Husain
0 from
Henning Schmiedehausen (due to missing license header on one test case file)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the latest 1.6.1
This is NOT a question for the developer's list. Please ask your
questions on u...@velocity.apache.org
p.s. just do $bracketedSumString.replace('','')
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Pavan pavan.as...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to learn velocity. Your manual is very useful and i
given the $velocityHasNext issues, i think we should do another bugfix
release. i'm willing, but if someone else is interested/willing then
i'd be happy to let them drive the process. any takers?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
None that i know of. Sounds like an odd bug. I would recommend
upgrading to Velocity 1.6.1. A great many bugs and performance
issues in 1.5 were fixed for 1.6. There is no benefit to remaining
with 1.5.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:21 AM, JBTechSoft jbsoftt...@gmail.com wrote:
We upgraded
Well, that didn't take long; the Gump complaints about the change to
LogSystem/LogChute have begun!! Only two ways to properly shut them
up...
- back that last change out of the trunk (perhaps making a 2.x branch
from the trunk first)
- go around updating the LogSystem/LogChute implementations
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Byron Foster by...@base2.cc wrote:
Here are some more performance numbers after Addressing the issues from the
last performance post (VELOCITY-662, VELOCITY-663), which reduced the
benchmark run time by about 20%.
9.8 ProxyVMContext get(String)
6.7
Yeah, that should be removed.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Byron Foster by...@base2.cc wrote:
The users-guide states the following which I don't think is true anymore..
should we remove this?
Velocimacro Trivia
Currently, Velocimacros must be defined before they are first used in a
Yeah, i glanced at it yesterday. It's a bit perplexing. Maybe some
change in Ant's trunk that didn't like our build.xml or
build.properties?
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Byron Foster by...@base2.cc wrote:
What's the deal with these build errors? Looking at the output it seems
cryptic. It
I build locally on 1.6 w/o any problems.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
Gump recently switched to using JDK 1.6 (from 1.5) - could that be the cause?
Niall
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, i
#set( $Integer = 0 )
#set( $total = $Integer.parseInt($string1) + $Integer.parseInt($string2) )
or put an instance of MathTool (from VelocityTools) in your context and do:
#set( $total = $math.add($string1, $string2) )
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Jesus Barbero jesus.barb...@opodo.com
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Byron Foster by...@base2.cc wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:22 , Claude Brisson wrote:
Rather confusing vote indeed... half of the votes ended up on the
private list, and there was a conditional vote.
I think we should just cc the votes to the private list so
Thanks for the detailed analysis. Would you open an issue for this in
our JIRA issue tracker?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Leon sdh5724 sdh5...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
when we upgrade to velocity1.6.1. But the process failed. we found a
critical bug for me.Would Dev Team patch the bug to version 1.6.1
soon?
Leon
2009/2/5 Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com
Thanks for the detailed analysis. Would you open an issue for this in
our JIRA issue tracker?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:32
Leon, i just went ahead and fixed it myself. Thanks for offering to
do the patch for it, though. This is now fixed in the trunk and all
active branches.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
That's alright. I opened one for you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira
Considering the arrival of VELOCITY-689 this morning, i figured i may
as well fix that and VELOCITY-681 and push for both to be in 1.6.2.
Claude, thanks for your patience and restraint! Had i been running
this vote, we'd be looking at doing a 1.6.3 now...
So, i'd like to formally change my vote
You could use the MathTool to round your result:
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/javadoc/org/apache/velocity/tools/generic/MathTool.html
You might also try consider using Float or BigDecimal types instead of Double.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:28 AM, BOUTERFASS Mostapha
Pretty much the same as any other release. You just put the links for
the download page in the alpha/beta section when publishing. Run the
ant release.howto and publish.howto targets for instructions.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Byron Foster by...@base2.cc wrote:
Hey, what's the process of
comments in line...
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, serg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to share with you a few ideas I have about new simple
improvements for DisplayTools. I should be able to make patches for
them if you are interested.
1. Add new method
isEmpty(object)
that will
Uh... are you sure you merged the right change? This commit doesn't
look anything like the message that describes it. And for that
matter, what is 0 syntax?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:05 PM, by...@apache.org wrote:
Author: byron
Date: Tue Feb 10 05:05:11 2009
New Revision: 742852
URL:
dependency on
* the view package of Velocity Tools in {...@link VelocityView} itself.
* This class requires Velocity Tools 2.0 or higher.
*
* @author Juergen Hoeller
* @author Nathan Bubna
* @see #setFactoryConfiguration
* @see #initTool
* @see org.apache.velocity.tools.view.context.ViewContext
and maintain it, then go for it.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Will Glass-Husain
wglasshus...@gmail.com wrote:
Why maintain two build systems? Why not just switch to maven?
WILL
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote:
No. We only use Maven for the website
Well, since the vote hadn't occured, i figured i may as well try and
slip two more fixes in there. Though really, neither are important.
701 is an old regression has a simple workaround and 702 is in a
pluggable class. If we wanna just run with this build, it works great
for me. We can't wait
PM, Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
dev@velocity.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Nathan Bubna closed VELOCITY-708.
-
The Method map does not get created
Hmm. There were a number of concurrency bugs cleaned up between 1.4
and 1.6.x. (like VELOCITY-383, VELOCITY-610, VELOCITY-24 and a few
others). If you are able to move to 1.6, you may well find this has
already been fixed.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Jessica Mong
jessica.m...@googlemail.com
,
Jessisa
Nathan Bubna wrote:
Hmm. There were a number of concurrency bugs cleaned up between 1.4
and 1.6.x. (like VELOCITY-383, VELOCITY-610, VELOCITY-24 and a few
others). If you are able to move to 1.6, you may well find this has
already been fixed.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Jessica
In 1.x we have:
directive.set.null.allowed = false
I think that we should flip that to true and perhaps even remove the
option in 2.0.
Does anyone out there rely on not being able to change variables to null?
Does anyone out there even remember why it wasn't allowed in the first place?
201 - 300 of 1183 matches
Mail list logo
