Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2007-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, On Jan 7, 4:00 pm, Michael Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7 Jan 2007 05:17:41 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If old GtkMozEmbed used to be supported on MS Windows than new GtkMozEmbed MUST support it too.That's the problem, GtkMozEmbed was not officially

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2007-01-10 Thread Oleg Romashin
However, if you wish to contribute to GtkMozEmbed WIN32 platform you can do it now: I agree 1. Make a patch containing your WIN32 related modifications against the latest GtkMozEmbed branched named 'MICROB_XXX_BRANCH' (where 'XXX' is a date). Currently the latest one is:

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2007-01-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 5, 6:18 pm, Michael Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27 Nov 2006 06:36:23 -0800, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope to kill anything resembling such plans. It's an awful idea. Please don't try building anything on windows based on gtkmozembed. Thanks. I disagree with

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2007-01-05 Thread Michael Hutchinson
On 27 Nov 2006 06:36:23 -0800, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vin wrote: can gtkmozembed in used on windows? there's a Gecko# project which theoretically would work on windows. Gecko# only wraps GtkMozEmbed. There's a version of GtkMozEmbed that works on Windows, which is why Gecko# is

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2007-01-03 Thread leoz . 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could not see any updates to the wiki and am interested in following your progress with this. I've updated the wiki with the current status of the new GtkMozEmbed development. Enjoy. LeoZ. ___ dev-embedding mailing list

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2006-12-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I made a branch today for the first pass of post landing work, but I think I'm going to close it tomorrow and replace it with a new branch where additional work will go for the next month or so, and maybe next time it'll land with fewer bumps. I'll update the wiki with their names tomorrow.

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2006-12-07 Thread timeless
we have a dist/sdk directory. They really should only expose that. But of course, if they did that, nothing would build. So obviously they don't. Keep the sdk directory in mind, it's where frozen stuff goes. ___ dev-embedding mailing list

GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2006-11-27 Thread timeless
hello as some of you may now, I'm timeless. i've been involved w/ the mozilla.org projects for a number of years now, and i've always had an interest in embeddings (and ports, and portability, and just about everything else...). as it happens, I recently became the owner of GtkMozEmbed. I also

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2006-11-27 Thread Vin
can gtkmozembed in used on windows? any development happening on that side? ___ dev-embedding mailing list dev-embedding@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding

Re: GtkMozEmbed for 1.9

2006-11-27 Thread timeless
Vin wrote: can gtkmozembed in used on windows? there's a Gecko# project which theoretically would work on windows. any development happening on that side? I hope to kill anything resembling such plans. It's an awful idea. Please don't try building anything on windows based on gtkmozembed.